CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2012; 22(04): 325-333
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.111487
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Pictorial essay: Salivary gland imaging

Rajul Rastogi
Yash Diagnostic Center, Yash Hospital and Research Center, Moradabad
,
Sumeet Bhargava
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Subharti Medical College, Meerut
,
Govindarajan Janardan Mallarajapatna
Department of Imaging and Interventions, Health Care Global Bangalore Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka
,
Sudhir Kumar Singh
Department of ENT, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Center, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh
› Author Affiliations
Source of Support: Nill.

Abstract

Salivary glands are the first organs of digestion secreting their digestive juices into the oral cavity. Parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands are the major paired salivary glands in the decreasing order of their size. In addition, multiple small minor salivary glands are noted randomly distributed in the upper aerodigestive tract, including paranasal sinuses and parapharyngeal spaces. The imaging is directed to the major salivary glands. Commonly used imaging methods include plain radiography and conventional sialography. Recently, high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) is being increasingly used for targeted salivary gland imaging. However, the advent of cross-sectional imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have revolutionized the imaging of salivary glands. This article illustrates the role of imaging in evaluating the variegated disease pattern of the major salivary glands.



Publication History

Article published online:
04 October 2021

© 2012. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 La′Porte SJ, Juttla JK, Lingam RK. Imaging the floor of the mouth and the sublingual space. Radio Graphics 2011;31:1215-30.
  • 2 Yousem DM, Kraut MA, Chalian AA. Major salivary gland imaging. Radiology 2000;216:19-29.
  • 3 Liyanage SH, Spencer SP, Hogarth KM, Makdissi J. Imaging of salivary glands. Imaging 2007;19:14-27.
  • 4 Drage NA, Brown JE. Cone beam computed sialography of sialoliths. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2009;38:301-5.
  • 5 Hugill J, Sala E, Hollingsworth KG, Lomas DJ. MR sialography: The effect of a sialogogue and ductal occlusion in volunteers. Br J Radiol 2008;967:583-6.
  • 6 Kalinowski M, Heverhagen JT, Rehberg E, Klose KJ, Wagner HJ. Comparative Study of MR Sialography and Digital Subtraction Sialography for Benign Salivary Gland Disorders. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23:1485-92.
  • 7 Cho HW, Kim J, Choi J, Choi HS, Kim ES, Kim SH, et al. Sonographically Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Major Salivary Gland Masses: A Review of 245 Cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1160-63.
  • 8 El-Khateeb SM, Abou-Khalaf AE, Farid MM, Nassef MA. A prospective study of three diagnostic sonographic methods in differentiation between benign and malignant salivary gland tumours. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 2011;40:476-85.
  • 9 Bialek EJ, Jakubowski W, Zajkowski P, Szopinski KT, Osmolski A. US of the Major Salivary Glands: Anatomy and Spatial Relationships, Pathologic Conditions, and Pitfalls. Radiographics 2006;26:745-63.
  • 10 Yabuuchi H, Fukuya T, Tajima T, Hachitanda Y, Tomita K, Koga M. Salivary Gland Tumors: Diagnostic Value of Gadolinium-enhanced Dynamic MR Imaging with Histopathologic Correlation. Radiology 2003;226:345-54.
  • 11 Yerli H, Aydin E, Habera N, Harman A, Kaskati T, Alibek S. Diagnosing common parotid tumours with magnetic resonance imaging including diffusion-weighted imaging versus fine-needle aspiration cytology: A comparative study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39:349-55.
  • 12 King AD, Yeung DK, Ahuja AT, Tse GM, Yuen HY, Wong KT, et al. Salivary gland tumors at in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2005;237:563-9.
  • 13 Shah VN, Branstetter BF 4th . Oncocytoma of the parotid gland: A potential false-positive finding on 18F-FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgeol 2007;189:W212-4.
  • 14 Marchal F, Dulguerov P. Sialolithiasis management: The state of the art. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:951-6.
  • 15 Christea A, Waldherrc C, Hallettd R, Zbaernb P, Thoenya H. MR imaging of parotid tumors: Typical lesion characteristics in MR imaging improve discrimination between benign and malignant disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1202-7.
  • 16 Patel ND, van Zante A, Eisele DW, Harnsberger HR, Glastonbury CM. Oncocytoma: The Vanishing Parotid Mass. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1703-6.
  • 17 Takagi Y, Sumi M, Sumi T, Ichikawa Y, Nakamura T. MR Microscopy of the parotid glands in patients with Sjögren′s syndrome: Quantitative MR diagnostic criteria. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1207-14.
  • 18 Gododia A, Bhalla AS, Sharma R, Thakar A, Parshad R. Bilateral parotid swelling: A radiological review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:403-14.
  • 19 Sato K, Gotoh C, Uchida H, Kawashima H, Yoshida M, Kitano Y, et al. Sialolipoma of the submandibular gland in a child. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:408-10.