PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2013; 23(03): 247-252
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.120257
Genitourinary and Obstetric Radiology

MR imaging of carcinoma cervix

Mangal Mahajan
Department of Radiology, Apurva MRI, Inlaks and Budharani Hospital Complex, Koregaon Park, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
Rajesh Kuber
Department of Radiology, Apurva MRI, Inlaks and Budharani Hospital Complex, Koregaon Park, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
K Chaudhari
Department of Radiology, Apurva MRI, Inlaks and Budharani Hospital Complex, Koregaon Park, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
Prashant Chaudhari
Department of Radiology, Apurva MRI, Inlaks and Budharani Hospital Complex, Koregaon Park, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
Pravin Ghadage
Department of Radiology, Apurva MRI, Inlaks and Budharani Hospital Complex, Koregaon Park, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
Rushikesh Naik
Department of Radiology, Apurva MRI, Inlaks and Budharani Hospital Complex, Koregaon Park, Pune, Maharashtra, India
› Institutsangaben Financial support and sponsorship Nil.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
  als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a common gynecological malignancy and a frequent cause of death. Patient outcome depends on tumor stage, size, nodal status, and histological grade. Correct tumor staging is important to decide the the treatment strategy. Magnetic Resonance Imaging is accepted as a preferred imaging modality to assess the prognostic factors.

Keywords

Carcinoma - cervix - MRI - staging


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
30. Juli 2021

© 2013. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Nicolate V, Carignan L, Bourdon F, Prosmanne O. MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: A practical staging approach. RadioGraphics 2000;20:1539-49.
  • 2 Szklaruk F, Tamm E, Choi H, Varavithya V. MR Imaging of common and uncommon pelvic masses. RadioGraphics 2003;23:403-24.
  • 3 FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009;105:103-4.
  • 4 Okamoto Y, Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, Yoshikawa H, Itai Y. MR Imaging of the uterine cervix: Imaging-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2003;23:425-45.
  • 5 Lax S. Histopathology of cervical precursor lesions and cancers. Acta Dermatoven APA 2011;20:125-33.
  • 6 Kaur H, Silverman PM, Iyer RB, Verschraegen CF, Eifel PJ, Charnsangavej C. Diagnosis, staging and surveillance of cervical carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1621-32.
  • 7 Kinkel K, Brown M, Sirlin C. Malignant disorders of the female pelvis. In: Edelman RR, Hesselink JR, Zlatkin MB, Crues JV, editors. Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 3 rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2005. p. 5580-7.
  • 8 Engin G, Kucucuk S, Olmez H, Hasiloglu ZI, Disci R, Aslay I. Correlation of clinical and MRI staging in cervical carcinoma treated with radiation therapy: A single cancer experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 2011;17:44-51.
  • 9 Charles-Edwards EM, Messiou C, Morgan V, De Silva SS, McWhinney NA, Katesmark M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in cervical cancer with an endovaginal technique: Potential value for improving tumor detection in stage Ia and Ib1 disease. Radiology 2008;249:541-50.
  • 10 Follen M, Levenback CF, Iyer RB, Grigsby PW, Boss EA, Delpassand ES ES, et al. Imaging in cervical cancer. Cancer Suppl Suppl 2003;98:2028-38.
  • 11 Sala E, Wakely S, Senior E, Lomas D. MRI of malignant neoplasm of the uterine corpus and cervix. Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1577-87 1577-87.
  • 12 Pannu HK, Corl FM, Fishman EK. CT evaluation of cervical cancer: Spectrum of disease. RadioGraphics 2001;21:1155-68.
  • 13 Son H, Kositwattanarerk A, Hayes MP, Chuang L, Rahaman F, Heiba S, et al. PET/CT evaluation of cervical cancer: Spectrum of disease. Radio Graphics 2010;30:1251-68.
  • 14 Feong YY, Kang HK, Chung TW, Seo FF, Park FG. Uterine cervical carcinoma after therapy: CT and MRI imaging findings. Radio Graphics 2003;23:969-81.
  • 15 De Bondt RB, Nelemans PJ, Bakers F, Casselman JW, Peutz-Kootstra C, Kremer B, et al. Morphological MRI criteria improve the detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Multivariate logistic regression analysis of MRI features of cervical lymph nodes. Eur Radiol 2009;19:626-33.
  • 16 Eifel PJ, Berek JS, Markman MA. Cervical cancer. In: DeVita VT, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA, editors. Cancer Principles and Practice of Oncology. 9 th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011 p. 1311-35.
  • 17 Mayr NA, William S Jr, Gaffney DK DK. Cervical Cancer. In: Lu JJ, Brady LW, editors. Decision Making in Radiation Oncology. New York: Springer; 2011;2 p. 661-701.