CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016; 26(01): 52-62
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.178326
Obs/Gynec

Fetal MRI: A pictorial essay

Sapna Rathee
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Bharati Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
Priscilla Joshi
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Bharati Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
Abhimanyu Kelkar
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Bharati Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
,
Nagesh Seth
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Bharati Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Ultrasonography (USG) is the primary method for antenatal fetal evaluation. However, fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has now become a valuable adjunct to USG in confirming/excluding suspected abnormalities and in the detection of additional abnormalities, thus changing the outcome of pregnancy and optimizing perinatal management. With the development of ultrafast sequences, fetal MRI has made remarkable progress in recent times. In this pictorial essay, we illustrate a spectrum of structural abnormalities affecting the central nervous system, thorax, genitourinary and gastrointestinal tract, as well as miscellaneous anomalies. Anomalies in twin gestations and placental abnormalities have also been included.



Publication History

Article published online:
30 July 2021

© 2016. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Smith FW, Adam AH, Phillips WD. NMR imaging in pregnancy. Lancet 1983;1:61-2.
  • 2 Levine D, Barnes PD, Sher S, Semelka RC, Li W, McArdle CR, et al. Fetal fast MR imaging: Reproducibility, technical quality, and conspicuity of anatomy. Radiology 1998;206:549-54.
  • 3 Canto-Moreira N. MRI Studies of the Fetal Brain and Cranium. Uppsala; 2012. p. 53.
  • 4 Shellock FG, Kanal E. Policies, guidelines, and recommendations for MR imaging safety and patient management.SMRIsafety committee. J MagnReson Imaging 1991;1:97-101.
  • 5 Prayer D, Kasprian G, Krampl E, Ulm B, Witzani L, Prayer L, et al. MRI of normal fetal brain development. Eur J Radiol 2006;57:199-216.
  • 6 Kazi AZ, Joshi PC, Kelkar AB, Mahajan MS, Ghawate AS. MRI evaluation of pathologies affecting the corpus callosum: A pictorial essay.Indian J Radiol Imaging 2013;23:321-32.
  • 7 Sawhney S, Machado L, Jain R.Prenatal MRI image of a fetus with semilobarholoprosencephaly.Sultan QaboosUniv Med J 2008;8:93-4.
  • 8 Pungavkar SA, Sainani NI, Karnik AS, Mohanty PH, Lawande MA, Patkar DP, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of iniencephaly: Sonographic and MR correlation: A case report.Korean J Radiol 2007;8:351-5.
  • 9 Sahid S, Sepulveda W, Dezerega V, Gutierrez J, Rodriguez L, Corral E. Iniencephaly: Prenatal diagnosis and management. PrenatDiagn 2000;20:202-5.
  • 10 Milhorat TH, Chou MW, Trinidad EM, Kula RW, MandellM, Wolpert C, et al.Chiari I malformation redefined: Clinical and radiographic findings for 364 symptomatic patients.Neurosurgery1999;44:1005-17.
  • 11 Kennedy WA. Assessment and management of fetal hydronephrosis. Urology 2002;10:214-9.
  • 12 Young HH, Frontz WA, Baldwin JC. Congenital obstruction of the posterior urethra. J Urol1919;3:289-365.
  • 13 Berrocal T, López-Pereira P, Arjonilla A, Gutiérrez J. Anomalies of the distal ureter, bladder, and urethra in children: Embryologic, radiologic, and pathologic features.Radiographics 2002;22:1139-64.
  • 14 Aslam M, Watson AR; Trent and Anglia MCDK Study Group.Unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney: Long term outcomes. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:820-3.
  • 15 Lee SY, Chari RS, Bhargava R. Fetal MRI in the evaluation of chest anomalies: A pictorial essay. UAHSJ 2006;3:27-30.
  • 16 Cannie MM, Jani JC, Van Kerkhove F, Meerschaert J, De Keyzer F, Lewi L, et al. Fetal body volume at MR imaging to quantify total fetal lung volume: Normal ranges. Radiology 2008;247:197-203.
  • 17 Stocker JT, Madewell JE, Drake RM. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Classification and morphologic spectrum. Hum Pathol 1977;8:155-71.
  • 18 Yoon YC, Lee KS, Kim TS, Kim J, Shim YM, Han J. Intrapulmonary bronchogenic cyst: CT and pathologic findings in five adult patients.AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:167-70.
  • 19 Makariou E, Pikis A, Harley EH. Cystic hygroma of the neck: Association with a growing venous aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:2102-4.
  • 20 Lockwood C, Ghidini A, Romero R.Amniotic band syndrome in monozygotic twins: Prenatal diagnosis and pathogenesis.ObstetGynecol 1988;71:1012-6.
  • 21 Phillips GN, Gordon DH, Martin EC, Haller JO, Casarella W. The Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome: Clinical and radiological aspects. Radiology 1978;128:429-34.
  • 22 Guimaraes CV, Kline-Fath BM, Linam LE, Garcia MA, Rubio EI, Lim FY. MRI findings in multifetal pregnancies complicated by twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAP). Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:694-701.
  • 23 Sebire NJ, Wong AE, Sepulveda W.Minimally invasive management of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAP). Fetal Matern Med Rev 2006;17:1-22.
  • 24 Glenn OA, Coakley FV. MRI of the fetal central nervous system and body. Clin Perinatol 2009;36:273-300.