Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2014; 35(01): 71-74
DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.133725
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A prospective study on the attitude of post graduates in general pediatrics toward pediatric oncology subspeciality as a career

Ram Prakash Thirugnanasambandam
Department of Pediatrics, Sri Ramachandra Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Magatha Sneha Latha
Division of Pediatric Hemato Oncology, Sri Ramachandra Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Aravind Moorthy
Division of Pediatric Hemato Oncology, Sri Ramachandra Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Lakshminarayanan Kannan
Department of Community Medicine, Pediatric Hemato Oncology Consultant, Sri Ramachandra Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Venkataraman Paramasivam
Department of Pediatrics, Sri Ramachandra Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Julius Xavier Scott
Department of Pediatrics, Sri Ramachandra Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives: The health care scenario in India is experiencing an increase in the number of children affected with cancer and the number of pediatric oncologists available to treat these children are few and the awareness of childhood cancer is decimally low. Hence, the purpose of this study was to determine the attitude of post-graduate students of general pediatrics towards childhood cancer and to assess their interest in pursuing pediatric oncology as a specialty in their carrier. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted among 188 post-graduates hailing from various Medical colleges all over South India who were attending a 2 day workshop at Chennai. The survey was a 10 point questionnaire pertaining to their previous training, competence, interest toward the field of hematooncology. The data were analyzed by SPSS 18.V software. Results: Among the post-graduates, 74.7% of them reported that they did not have a pediatric oncology unit in their institution. 63.3% reported that they never been posted in pediatric oncology clinical postings before. 62% were not interested in pursuing pediatric oncology as a sub-specialty at all. 45.3% felt that pediatric oncology was too depressing to take as a specialty. 46.7% felt that late diagnosis and referral was the main factor which contributed to the failure of effective treatment of childhood cancers. 52.7% had never attended a class on pediatric oncology. 61.3% felt that they did not have sufficient knowledge to suspect and refer a child with cancer. 92% felt that there was a need to improve pediatric oncology teaching in their curriculum. 56.7% felt that the best way to imprint awareness on childhood malignancies was to improve pediatric oncology teaching in their medical curriculum. Conclusion: The results show that majority of post-graduates in pediatrics were not interested in pursuing pediatric oncology as a sub-specialty. The main reasons may be lack of specialized Pediatric oncology units in the majority of the medical institutions, lack of opportunity of these post-graduates to attend clinical postings and theory classes. They thus lack sufficient information in this field and hence do not want to take up a career in pediatric oncology.

Keywords

Knowledge - pediatric oncology - teaching


Publication History

Article published online:
19 July 2021

© 2014. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Arora B, Banvali SD. Pediatric oncology in India: Past, present and future. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2009;30:121-3.
  • 2 Advani SH, Agarwal R, Venugopal P, Saikia TK. Pediatric oncology in India.Indian J Pediatr 1987;54:843-5.
  • 3 Raghunadharao D. Developing Infrastructure for pediatric Oncology in. India: India Pediatric Oncology Initiative Experience. Mar 23, 2009 none available.
  • 4 Cull WL, Yudkowsky BK, Schonfeld DJ, Berkowitz CD, Pan RJ. Research exposure during pediatric residency: Influence on career expectations. J Pediatr 2003;143:564-9.
  • 5 Harris MC, Marx J, Gallagher PR, Ludwig S. General vs subspecialty pediatrics: Factors leading to residents′ career decisions over a 12-year period. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:212-6.
  • 6 Szymczak JE, Bosk CL. Training for efficiency: Work, time, and systems-based practice in medical residency. J Health Soc Behav 2012;53:344-58.
  • 7 McGregor LM, Metzger ML, Sanders R, Santana VM. Pediatric cancers in the new millennium: Dramatic progress, new challenges. Oncology (Williston Park) 2007;21:809-20.
  • 8 Stefan DC, Siemonsma F. Delay and causes of delay in the diagnosis of childhoodcancer in Africa. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011;56:80-5.
  • 9 Hahn T, McCarthy PL Jr, Hassebroek A, Bredeson C, Gajewski JL, et al. Significant Improvement in Survival After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation During a Period of Significantly Increased Use, Older Recipient Age, and Use of Unrelated Donors. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2437-9.
  • 10 Armenian SH, Bhatia S. Chronic health conditions in childhood cancer survivors: Is it all treatment-related - or do genetics play a role? J Gen Intern Med 2009;24 Suppl 2:S395-400.