Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.180136
The correlation between Ki-67 with other prognostic factors in breast cancer: A study in Iranian patients
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00050348/201602/lookinside/thumbnails/10_4103_0971-5851_180136_95-1.jpg)
Abstract
Context: Despite the fact that breast cancer (BC) is a major health issue, very few studies describe its characteristics in the Middle East. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use and value of Ki-67 as a prognostic marker in BC and associations between Ki-67, clinical, and histopathological parameters were evaluated. Subjects and Methods: In a retrospective study, 260 BC women and invasive ductal carcinoma were included to our study in Kermanshah city, Iran. Age, tumor size, lymph node involvement, histological grade, nuclear grade, and vascular invasion were other factors that determined in a lot of patients. Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 47.6 years (range, 24-84 years) with 100% female. Of 243 patients that tumor size was determined for them, 207 patients (85.2%) had tumor size ≥ 2 cm, and 36 patients (14.8%) had size <2 cm and also of 237 patients, 47 patients (19.8%), 140 (59.1%), and 50 (21.1%) had histological grades I, II, and III, respectively. There is significant correlation between Ki-67 with nuclear grade, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and p53 (P < 0.05). Based on this result, more patients with Ki-67 ≥ 20% have higher nuclear grade, p53-positive, and HER2-positive. There was correlation between Ki-67 with type of tumor (P = 0.009). Conclusions: The higher Ki-67 has a direct significant correlation with higher nuclear grade, p53-positive, and HER2-positive. Furthermore, triple negative patients have higher Ki-67 compared to other subtypes.
Publication History
Article published online:
12 July 2021
© 2016. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Ahmadi AS, Mahdipour L, Payandeh M, Sadeghi M. Epidemiology, pathology and histochemistry features in women with breast cancer. Am J Cancer Prev 2015;3:54-7.
- 2 Kobayashi T, Iwaya K, Moriya T, Yamasaki T, Tsuda H, Yamamoto J, et al. A simple immunohistochemical panel comprising 2 conventional markers, Ki67 and p53, is a powerful tool for predicting patient outcome in luminal-type breast cancer. BMC Clin Pathol 2013;13:5.
- 3 Payandeh M, Sadeghi M, Sadeghi E, Aeinfar M. Clinicopathology figures and long-term effects of tamoxifen plus radiation on survival of women with invasive ductal carcinoma and triple negative breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:4863-7.
- 4 Masuda H, Masuda N, Kodama Y, Ogawa M, Karita M, Yamamura J, et al. Predictive factors for the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2011;67:911-7.
- 5 de Azambuja E, Cardoso F, de Castro G Jr., Colozza M, Mano MS, Durbecq V, et al. Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: A meta-analysis of published studies involving 12,155 patients. Br J Cancer 2007;96:1504-13.
- 6 Colozza M, Azambuja E, Cardoso F, Sotiriou C, Larsimont D, Piccart MJ. Proliferative markers as prognostic and predictive tools in early breast cancer: Where are we now? Ann Oncol 2005;16:1723-39.
- 7 Stuart-Harris R, Caldas C, Pinder SE, Pharoah P. Proliferation markers and survival in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies in 32,825 patients. Breast 2008;17:323-34.
- 8 Nishimura R, Osako T, Okumura Y, Hayashi M, Toyozumi Y, Arima N. Ki-67 as a prognostic marker according to breast cancer subtype and a predictor of recurrence time in primary breast cancer. Exp Ther Med 2010;1:747-54.
- 9 Kontzoglou K, Palla V, Karaolanis G, Karaiskos I, Alexiou I, Pateras I, et al. Correlation between Ki67 and breast cancer prognosis. Oncology 2013;84:219-25.
- 10 Inwald EC, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Hofstädter F, Zeman F, Koller M, Gerstenhauer M, et al. Ki-67 is a prognostic parameter in breast cancer patients: Results of a large population-based cohort of a cancer registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;139:539-52.
- 11 Haroon S, Hashmi AA, Khurshid A, Kanpurwala MA, Mujtuba S, Malik B, et al. Ki67 index in breast cancer: Correlation with other prognostic markers and potential in pakistani patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:4353-8.
- 12 Nishimura R, Osako T, Nishiyama Y, Tashima R, Nakano M, Fujisue M, et al. Prognostic significance of Ki-67 index value at the primary breast tumor in recurrent breast cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 2014;2:1062-8.
- 13 Sahin AA, Ro J, Ro JY, Blick MB, el-Naggar AK, Ordonez NG, et al. Ki-67 immunostaining in node-negative stage I/II breast carcinoma. Significant correlation with prognosis. Cancer 1991;68:549-57.
- 14 Keshgegian AA, Cnaan A. Proliferation markers in breast carcinoma. Mitotic figure count, S-phase fraction, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Ki-67 and MIB-1. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;104:42-9.
- 15 Payandeh M, Malayeri R, Sadeghi M, Sadeghi E, Gholami F. Expression of p53 and Ki67 in the patients with triple negative breast cancer and invasive ductal carcinoma. Am J Cancer Prev 2015;3:58-61.
- 16 Sirvent JJ, Salvadó MT, Santafé M, Martínez S, Brunet J, Alvaro T, et al. p53 in breast cancer. Its relation to histological grade, lymph-node status, hormone receptors, cell-proliferation fraction (ki-67) and c-erbB-2. Immunohistochemical study of 153 cases. Histol Histopathol 1995;10:531-9.
- 17 González-Sistal A, Sánchez AB, Del Rio MC, Arias JI, Herranz M, Ruibal A. Association between tumor size and immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67, p53 and BCL2 in a node-negative breast cancer population selected from a breast cancer screening program. Anticancer Res 2014;34:269-73.
- 18 Li FY, Wu SG, Zhou J, Sun JY, Lin Q, Lin HX, et al. Prognostic value of Ki-67 in breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph nodes: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2014;9:e87264.
- 19 Park D, Kåresen R, Noren T, Sauer T. Ki-67 expression in primary breast carcinomas and their axillary lymph node metastases: Clinical implications. Virchows Arch 2007;451:11-8.
- 20 Dikicioglu E, Barutca S, Meydan N, Meteoglu I. Biological characteristics of breast cancer at the primary tumour and the involved lymph nodes. Int J Clin Pract 2005;59: 1039-44.
- 21 Spyratos F, Ferrero-Poüs M, Trassard M, Hacène K, Phillips E, Tubiana-Hulin M, et al. Correlation between MIB-1 and other proliferation markers: Clinical implications of the MIB-1 cutoff value. Cancer 2002;94:2151-9.
- 22 Trihia H, Murray S, Price K, Gelber RD, Golouh R, Goldhirsch A, et al. Ki-67 expression in breast carcinoma: Its association with grading systems, clinical parameters, and other prognostic factors — A surrogate marker? Cancer 2003;97:1321-31.
- 23 Jacquemier J, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Esterni B, Extra JM, Houvenaeghel G, et al. Association of GATA3, P53, Ki67 status and vascular peritumoral invasion are strongly prognostic in luminal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2009;11:R23.
- 24 Stathopoulos GP, Malamos NA, Markopoulos C, Polychronis A, Armakolas A, Rigatos S, et al. The role of Ki-67 in the proliferation and prognosis of breast cancer molecular classification subtypes. Anticancer Drugs 2014;25:950-7.