CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2013; 5(02): 083-089
DOI: 10.4103/0974-2727.119847
Original Article

Role of GenoType® Mycobacterium Common Mycobacteria/Additional Species Assay for Rapid Differentiation between Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex and Different Species of Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria

Amresh Kumar Singh
Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Anand Kumar Maurya
Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Jyoti Umrao
Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Surya Kant
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Ram Awadh Singh Kushwaha
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Vijaya Laskshmi Nag
Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Tapan N Dhole
Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations
Source of Support: Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

ABSTRACT

Background: Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) may or may not have same clinical presentations, but the treatment regimens are always different. Laboratory differentiation between MTBC and NTM by routine methods are time consuming and cumbersome to perform. We have evaluated the role of GenoType® Mycobacterium common mycobacteria/additional species (CM/AS) assay for differentiation between MTBC and different species of NTM in clinical isolates from tuberculosis (TB) cases.

Materials and Methods: A total of 1080 clinical specimens were collected from January 2010 to June 2012. Diagnosis was performed by Ziehl-Neelsen staining followed by culture in BacT/ALERT 3D system (bioMerieux, France). A total of 219 culture positive clinical isolates (BacT/ALERT® MP cultures) were selected for differentiation by p-nitrobenzoic acid (PNB) sensitivity test as and BIO-LINE SD Ag MPT64 TB test considering as the gold standard test. Final identification and differentiation between MTBC and different species of NTM were further confirmed by GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS assay (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany).

Results: Out of 219 BacT/ALERT® MP culture positive isolates tested by PNB as 153 MTBC (69.9%) and by GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS assay as 159 (72.6%) MTBC and remaining 60 (27.4%) were considered as NTM species. The GenoType® Mycobacterium CM/AS assay was proved 99.3% sensitive and 98.3% specific for rapid differentiation of MTBC and NTM. The most common NTM species were; Mycobacterium fortuitum 20 (33.3%) among rapid growing mycobacteria and Mycobacterium intracellulare 11 (18.3%) among slow growing mycobacteria.

Conclusion: The GenoType® Mycobacterium assay makes rapid and accurate identification of NTM species as compared with different phenotypic and molecular diagnostic tool and helps in management of infections caused by different mycobacteria.



Publication History

Article published online:
07 April 2020

© 2013.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 RNTCP. Status TB Report. Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi: Central TB Division. Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family welfare; 2010. Available from: http://www.tbcindia.org. [Last accessed on 2011 Feb 07].
  • 2 Hasegawa N, Miura T, Ishii K, Yamaguchi K, Lindner TH, Merritt S, et al. New simple and rapid test for culture confirmation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: A multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:908-12.
  • 3 Park MY, Kim YJ, Hwang SH, Kim HH, Lee EY, Jeong SH, et al. Evaluation of an immunochromatographic assay kit for rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:481-4.
  • 4 Marzouk M, Kahla IB, Hannachi N, Ferjeni A, Salma WB, Ghezal S, et al. Evaluation of an immunochromatographic assay for rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2011;69:396-9.
  • 5 Ting SW, Chia CL, Hsin CL. Current situations on identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria. J Biomed Lab Sci 2009;21:1-6.
  • 6 Lee JC, Yu FL, Lin MH, Huang GS, Chang CY, Cheng CL, et al. Utility of immunochromatographic assay for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis from positive BACTEC MGIT 960 Cultures. J Biomed Lab Sci 2010;22:64-8.
  • 7 French AL, Benator DA, Gordin FM. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Med Clin North Am 1997;81:361-79.
  • 8 Ichiyama S, Iinuma Y, Yamori S, Hasegawa Y, Shimokata K, Nakashima N. Mycobacterium growth indicator tube testing in conjunction with the AccuProbe or the AMPLICOR-PCR assay for detecting and identifying mycobacteria from sputum samples. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:2022-5.
  • 9 Laughon BE. New tuberculosis drugs in development. Curr Top Med Chem 2007;7:463-73.
  • 10 World Health Orgnization. The Use of Liquid Medium for Culture and Drug Susceptibility Testing (DST) in Low- and Medium-income Settings: Summary of the Expert Group Meeting on the use of liquid culture systems. Geneva: 26 March 2007. Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/dots/laboratory/policy/en/index3.html. [Last Accessed on 2012 Feb 22].
  • 11 Lee AS, Jelfs P, Sintchenko V, Gilbert GL. Identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria: Utility of the GenoType Mycobacterium CM/AS assay compared with HPLC and 16S rRN A gene sequencing. J Med Microbiol 2009;58:900-4.
  • 12 Chihota VN, Grant AD, Fielding K, Ndibongo B, van Zyl A, Muirhead D, et al. Liquid vs. solid culture for tuberculosis: Performance and cost in a resource-constrained setting. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2010;14:1024-31.
  • 13 Scott CP, Filho LD, Mello FC, Thornton CG, Bishai WR, Fonseca LS, et al. Comparison of C (18)-carboxypropylbetaine and standard N-acetyl-L-cysteine-NaOH processing of respiratory specimens for increasing tuberculosis smear sensitivity in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:3219-22.
  • 14 Carricajo A, Fonsale N, Vautrin AC, Aubert G. Evaluation of BacT/Alert 3D liquid culture system for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens using sodium dodecyl (lauryl) sulfate-NaOH decontamination. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:3799-800.
  • 15 Angeby KA, Werngren J, Toro JC, Hedström G, Petrini B, Hoffner SE. Evaluation of the BacT/ALERT 3D system for recovery and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003;9:1148-52.
  • 16 Kubica GP. Differential identification of mycobacteria. VII. Key features for identification of clinically significant mycobacteria. Am Rev Respir Dis 1973;107:9-21.
  • 17 Addo K, Owusu-Darko K, Yeboah-Manu D, Caulley P, Minamikawa M, Bonsu F, et al. Mycobacterial species causing pulmonary tuberculosis at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana. Ghana Med J 2007;41:52-7.
  • 18 Sharma B, Pal N, Malhotra B, Vyas L. Evaluation of a rapid differentiation test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis from other mycobacteria by selective inhibition with p-nitrobenzoic acid using MGIT 960. J Lab Physicians 2010;2:89-92.
  • 19 Maurya AK, Nag VL, Kant S, Kushwaha RA, Kumar M, Mishra V, et al. Evaluation of an immunochromatographic test for discrimination between Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and non tuberculous mycobacteria in clinical isolates from extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res 2012;135:901-6.
  • 20 O′Hara CM, Weinstein MP, Miller JM. Manual and automated system for detection and identification of microorganisms. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Pfaller MA, Yolken RH, editors. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 8th ed., Vol. 1. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2003. p. 20036-2904.
  • 21 Richter E, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Hillemann D. Evaluation of the GenoType Mycobacterium Assay for identification of mycobacterial species from cultures. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:1769-75.
  • 22 Sharma SK, Mohan A. Extra pulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res 2004;120:316-53.
  • 23 Somoskovi A, Mester J, Hale YM, Parsons LM, Salfinger M. Laboratory diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin Chest Med 2002;23:585-97.
  • 24 Tortoli E, Bartoloni A, Böttger EC, Emler S, Garzelli C, Magliano E, et al. Burden of unidentifiable mycobacteria in a reference laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:4058-65.
  • 25 Ismail NA, Baba K, Pombo D, Hoosen AA. Use of an immunochromatographic kit for the rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from broth cultures. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2009;13:1045-7.
  • 26 Singh AK, Dhole TN, Maurya AK, Singh AK, Kumar M, Umrao J, et al. Evaluation of rapid TB antigen MPT64 test for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in liquid culture isolates at tertiary care center in Northern India. Int J Infect Dis 2012;16:e294.
  • 27 Mäkinen J, Marjamäki M, Marttila H, Soini H. Evaluation of a novel strip test, GenoType Mycobacterium CM/AS, for species identification of mycobacterial cultures. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12:481-3.
  • 28 Padilla E, González V, Manterola JM, Pérez A, Quesada MD, Gordillo S, et al. Comparative evaluation of the new version of the INNO-LiPA mycobacteria and genotype mycobacterium assays for identification of mycobacterium species from MB/BacT liquid cultures artificially inoculated with mycobacterial strains. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:3083-8.
  • 29 Ruiz P, Gutierrez J, Zerolo FJ, Casal M. GenoType mycobacterium assay for identification of mycobacterial species isolated from human clinical samples by using liquid medium. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:3076-8.
  • 30 Russo C, Tortoli E, Menichella D. Evaluation of the new genotype mycobacterium assay for identification of mycobacterial species. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:334-9.
  • 31 Martín-Casabona N, Bahrmand AR, Bennedsen J, Thomsen VO, Curcio M, Fauville-Dufaux M, et al. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria: Patterns of isolation. A multi-country retrospective survey. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004;8:1186-93.
  • 32 Jani MN, Rodrigues CS, Mehta AP. The neglected and often ignored: Nontuberculous mycobacteria. J Glob Infect Dis 2011;3:94.