CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2011; 3(01): 033-036
DOI: 10.4103/0974-2727.78561
Original Article

Comparison of Disc Diffusion Methods for the Detection of Extended-Spectrum Beta Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Ravi S Giriyapur
Departments of Microbiology, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh India
,
Namratha W Nandihal
Departments of Microbiology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka India
,
Krishna B V S.
Departments of Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Central Pathology Laboratories, Hartshill Road, Stoke on Trent ST4 7PX, UK India
,
Asha B Patil
Departments of Microbiology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka India
,
Chandrasekhar M R.
Departments of Microbiology, Belgaum Institute of Medical Sciences, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
Source of Support: Nil

ABSTRACT

Background: Resistance to broad-spectrum β lactams, mediated by extended-spectrum β lactamases (ESBLs), is an increasing problem world wide. This resistance poses problems for in vitro testing and reporting. Increased prevalence of ESBLs among Enterobacteriaceae creates a great need for laboratory testing methods that will accurately identify their presence.

Materials and Methods: During the study, the Enterobacteriaceae isolated were tested for the presence of ESBL by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) screening test, Jarlier double disc synergy (approximation) test (DDST) and NCCLS phenotypic confirmatory test (PCT), and compared their efficiency in detection.

Results: A total of 313 Enterobacteriaceae were isolated and tested for the presence of ESBL. NCCLS PCT identified 200 (63.89%) as ESBL producers and DDST identified 176 (56.23%), with a P-value of <0.001. Among the screening agents, ceftazidime had a better sensitivity (89.49%) and specificity (95.74%).

Conclusions: Close monitoring of the susceptibility pattern of isolates and careful spacing with specific discs can identify many ESBL producers. Ceftazidime has a better sensitivity and specificity as a screening agent. A combination of different tests can be useful for accurate identification.



Publication History

Article published online:
29 January 2020

© 2011.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Jacoby GA, Han P. Detection of Extended-Spectrum ß-Lactamases in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumonia and Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 1996;4:908-11.
  • 2 Coudron PE, Molland ES, Sanders CC. Occurrence and Detection of Extended Spectrum â-Lactamases in members of he family Enterobacteriaceae at A Veterans Medical Centre: Seek and You May Find. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:2593-7.
  • 3 Emery CL. Weymouth LA. Detection and Clinical Significance of Extended - Spectrum beta-Lactamases in a Tertiary care Medical Center. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:2061-7.
  • 4 Chaudhary U, Aggarwal R, Extended Spectrum â-Lactamases-An Emerging threat to Clinical therapeutics. Ind J Med Microbiol 2004;22:75-80.
  • 5 Revathi G, Singh S. Detection of Expanded spectrum cephalosporin resistance due to inducible lastamases in hospital isolates. Indian J Med Microbiol 1997;15:113-5.
  • 6 Bradford PA. Extended Spectrum ß Lactamases in the 21st century: Characterization, Epidemiology and Detection of This Important Resistance Threat. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001;14:933-51.
  • 7 Phillipon A, Labia R, Jacoby G. Extended Spectrum ß-Lactamases (MINIREVIEW). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1989;33:1131-6.
  • 8 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for Antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing; 12th Informational Spplement. Wayne, PA, USA: NCCLS; 2002. p. M100-S12.
  • 9 Jarlier V, Nicolas M, Fournier G, Phillipon A. ESBLs conferring transferable resistance to newer ß- lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae; hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev Infect Dis 1988;10:867-78.
  • 10 Shukla I, Tiwari R, Agrawal M. Prevalence of ESBL producing K. pneumoniae in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Med Microbiol 2004;22:87-97.
  • 11 HO PL, Tsang DN, Que TL, Ho M, Yuenky. Comparison of screening methods for detection of Extended Spectrum ß-Lactamases and their prevalence among E.coli and Klebsiella spp. in Hongkong. APMIS 2000;108:237-40.
  • 12 Tenover FC, Ranxey PM, Williams PP, Rasheed JK, Biddle JW, Oliver A, et al. Evaluation of he NCCLS ESBL confirmation methods for E.coli with isolates collected during project ICARE. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:3142-6.
  • 13 Babypadmini S, Apparajalu B. ESBLs in Urinary isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Prevalence and susceptibility pattern in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Med Microbiol 2004;22:172-4.
  • 14 Singhal S, Mathur T, Khan S, Upadhyay DJ, Chug S, Govind R, et al. Evaluation of methods for Amp C ß lactamases in Gram Negative clinical isolates from Tertiary care hospitals. Ind J Clin Microbiol 2005;23:120-4.
  • 15 Mathur P, Kapil A, Das B, Dhawan B. Prevalence of Extended Spectrum ß Lactamase producing GNB in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Med Res 2000;15:153-7.
  • 16 Datta P, Thakur A, Mishra B, Gupta V. Prevalence of clinical strains Resistant to various ß-Lactamas in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India. Jpn J Infect Dis 2004;57:146-9.
  • 17 Vercauteren E, Deschecmaeker P, Ieven M, Sanders CC, Goossens H. Comparison of Screening Methods for Detection of Extended Spectrum ß-Lactamases and their Prevalence among Blood Isolates of E.coli and Klebsiella spp. In a Belgian Teaching Hospital. J Clin microbial 1997;35:2191-2.
  • 18 Zali FN, Chanawaong A, Kerr KG, Birkenhead D, Hawkey PM. Detection of Extended Spectrum ß-Lactamases in members of the family Enterobacteriaceae; Comparison of MAST DD test, the double disc and E test ESBL. J Antimicrobial chemother 2000;45:881-5.