Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2013; 07(03): 382-386
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.115428
Short Communication
Dental Investigation Society

Repair of a fractured implant overdenture gold bar: A clinical and laboratory technique report

Fahim Vohra
1   Department of Prosthetic Science, SDS, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
,
Amani Al Fawaz
1   Department of Prosthetic Science, SDS, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

This clinical report explains a convenient, efficient, yet effective alternative for management of fractured substructure cast bars for implant-retained overdentures. The technique allows the fracture to be repaired at low cost and short time without remaking the substructure and the denture and further allowing the patient to keep their denture. The report sketches the clinical and laboratory procedures involved in the repair.

Key words:

Dolder bar - implant-supported overdenture - soldering
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Pjetursson BE, Bragger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth supported fixed dental prosthesis and implant supported FDP′s and single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 97-113
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Stellingsma C, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Kuiper C, Raghoebar GM. Implantology and theseverely resorbed edentulous mandible. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004; 15: 240-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Jemt T, Lindquist L, Hedegard B. Changes in chewing patterns of patients with complete dentures after placement of osseointegrated implants in the mandible. J Prosthet Dent 985 (53) 578-83
  • 4 Davis DM. Implant-stabilized over dentures. Dent Update 1997; 24: 106-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Bergendal T, Engquist B. Implant-supported overdentures: A longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 253-62
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 413-4
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Stellingsma K, Slagter AP, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ. Masticatory function in patients with an extremely resorbed mandible restored with mandibular implant-retained overdentures: Comparison of three types of treatment protocols. J Oral Rehab 2005; 32: 403-10
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Feine JS, Dufresne E, Boudrias P, Lund JP. Outcome assessment of implant-supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 575-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Fueki K, Kimoto K, Ogawa T, Garrett NR. Effect of implant-supported or retained dentures on masticatory performance: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98: 470-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant overdentures: The Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 425-33
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Widbom C, Soderfeldt B, Kronstrom M. A retrospective evaluation of treatments with implant-supported maxillary overdentures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7: 166-72
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Ekfeldt A, Johansson LA, Isaksson S. Implant-supported overdenture therapy: A retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 1997; 10: 366-74
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Watson RM, Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath MR, Hutton JE. et al. Prosthodontic treatment, patient response, and the need for maintenance of complete implant-supported overdentures: An appraisal of 5 years of prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 1997; 10: 345-54
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Allen PF, McMillan AS, Smith DG. Complications and maintenance requirements of implant-supported prosthesis provided in a UK dental hospital. Br Dent J 1997; 182: 298-302
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Jemt T, Book K, Linden B, Urde G. Failures and complications in 92 consecutively inserted overdentures supported by Branemark implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae: A study from prosthetic treatment to first annual check-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 162-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 537-52
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Jennings KJ, Lilly P. Bar-retained overdentures for implants-technical aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 380-4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Misch C. Dental implant prosthetics. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2004: 319-20
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Salcetti JM, Moriarty JD, Cooper LF, Smith FW, Collins JG, Socransky SS. et al. The Clinical, Microbial and Host response characteristics of the failing implant. Int J Oral Max Implants 1997; 12: 32-42
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Kreissl ME, Gerds T, Muche R, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Technical complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 720-6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Waddell JN, Payne AG, Swain MV. Physical and metallurgical considerations of failures of soldered bars in bar attachment systems for implant overdentures: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 283-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar