PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2014; 08(03): 348-352
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.137646
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Push-out bond strength of different mineral trioxide aggregates

Huseyin Ertas
1   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkiye
,
Ebru Kucukyilmaz
2   Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkiye
,
Evren Ok
3   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Sifa University, Izmir, Turkiye
,
Banu Uysal
1   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkiye
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
25. September 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
  als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study was aimed to evaluate and to compare the push-out bond strength of different brands of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) with a calcium enriched mixture cement (CEM). Materials and Methods: Fifteen extracted, single-rooted human teeth were used. The middle-third of the roots were sliced perpendicular to the long axis into 1.00 ± 0.05 mm thick serial slices (15 root × 4 slice = 60 specimen). The specimens were then divided into three groups (n = 20). The standardized root discs were filled with white CEM, ProRoot MTA, MTA-Angelus and wrapped in a serum-soaked gauze. After 3 days at relative humidity, the push-out bond strengths were measured with a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests. Results: The mean push-out bond strength value of the ProRoot MTA group (12.7 ± 2.5 MPa) was the highest and statistically significant difference was recorded between ProRoot MTA and other groups (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the mean bond strength of CEM cement (4.6 ± 1.1 MPa) and MTA-Angelus (4.5 ± 1.5 MPa) (P = 0.982). Conclusion: The push-out bond strength of MTA was changed with the brands and ProRoot MTA had the highest push-out bond strength.

Key words:

Calcium enriched mixture cement - mineral trioxide aggregate-angelus - ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate - push-out bond strength
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: Systematic review of the literature - Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 6-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hoen MM, Pink FE. Contemporary endodontic retreatments: An analysis based on clinical treatment findings. J Endod 2002; 28: 834-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Siqueira Jr JF, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod 2008; 34: 1291-13013
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR. Root end filling materials: A review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996; 12: 161-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Petrou MA, Alhamoui FA, Welk A, Altarabulsi MB, Alkilzy MH, Splieth C. randomized clinical trial on the use of medical Portland cement, MTA and calcium hydroxide in indirect pulp treatment. J Clin Oral Invest. 2013 doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1107-z
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Main C, Mirzayan N, Shabahang S, Torabinejad M. Repair of root perforations using mineral trioxide aggregate: A long-term study. J Endod 2004; 30: 80-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Unal GC, Maden M, Isidan T. Repair of furcal iatrogenic perforation with mineral trioxide aggregate: Two years follow-up of two cases. Eur J Dent 2010; 4: 475-81
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Lee SJ, Monsef M, Pitt Ford TR. Investigation of mineral trioxide aggregate for root-end filling in dogs. J Endod 1995; 21: 603-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Habibi M, Ghoddusi J, Habibi A, Mohtasham N. Healing process following application of set or fresh mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling material. Eur J Dent 2011; 5: 19-23
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Camp JH. Diagnosis dilemmas in vital pulp therapy: Treatment for the toothache is changing, especially in young, immature teeth. J Endod 2008; 34: S6-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yildirim T, Gencoglu N. Use of mineral trioxide aggregate in the treatment of large periapical lesions: Reports of three cases. Eur J Dent 2010; 4: 468-74
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hayashi M, Shimizu A, Ebisu S. MTA for obturation of mandibular central incisors with open apices: Case report. J Endod 2004; 30: 120-2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Asgary patent. Endodontic filling material. US2008/0206716; 2008
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Asgary S, Shahabi S, Jafarzadeh T, Amini S, Kheirieh S. The properties of a new endodontic material. J Endod 2008; 34: 990-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review - Part I: Chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod 2010; 36: 16-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review - Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod 2010; 36: 400-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Parirokh M, Ghoddusi J. Effect of two storage solutions on surface topography of two root-end fillings. Aust Endod J 2009; 35: 147-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gandolfi MG, Taddei P, Tinti A, Prati C. Apatite-forming ability (bioactivity) of ProRoot MTA. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 917-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gandolfi MG, Taddei P, Modena E, Siboni F, Prati C. Biointeractivity-related versus chemi/physisorption-related apatite precursor-forming ability of current root end filling materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013; 101: 1107-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gandolfi MG, Taddei P, Siboni F, Modena E, Ciapetti G, Prati C. Development of the foremost light-curable calcium-silicate MTA cement as root-end in oral surgery. Chemical-physical properties, bioactivity and biological behavior. Dent Mater 2011; 27: e134-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Shokouhinejad N, Nekoofar MH, Iravani A, Kharrazifard MJ, Dummer PM. Effect of acidic environment on the push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2010; 36: 871-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT. The biomineralization ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement on dentin enhances the push-out strength. J Endod 2010; 36: 286-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Huffman BP, Mai S, Pinna L, Weller RN, Primus CM, Gutmann JL. et al. Dislocation resistance of ProRoot Endo Sealer, a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer, from radicular dentine. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 34-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Iacono F, Gandolfi MG, Huffman B, Sword J, Agee K, Siboni F. et al. Push-out strength of modified Portland cements and resins. Am J Dent 2010; 23: 43-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose?. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 57-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Drummond JL, Sakaguchi RL, Racean DC, Wozny J, Steinberg AD. Testing mode and surface treatment effects on dentin bonding. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 32: 533-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 1999; 25: 197-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Saunders WP. A prospective clinical study of periradicular surgery using mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling. J Endod 2008; 34: 660-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, Monticelli F, Raffaelli O, Cardoso PC. et al. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: Comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 353-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gancedo-Caravia L, Garcia-Barbero E. Influence of humidity and setting time on the push-out strength of mineral trioxide aggregate obturations. J Endod 2006; 32: 894-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gandolfi MG, Taddei P, Siboni F, Modena E, Ginebra MP, Prati C. Fluoride-containing nanoporous calcium-silicate MTA cements for endodontics and oral surgery: Early fluorapatite formation in a phosphate-containing solution. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 938-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Gandolfi MG, Taddei P, Tinti A, De Stefano Dorigo E, Rossi PL, Prati C. Kinetics of apatite formation on a calcium-silicate cement for root-end filling during ageing in physiological-like phosphate solutions. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14: 659-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Gandolfi MG, Taddei P, Tinti A, De Stefano Dorigo E, Prati C. Alpha-TCP improves the apatite-formation ability of calcium-silicate hydraulic cement soaked in phosphate solutions. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2011; 31: 1412-22
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gandolfi MG, Iacono F, Agee K, Siboni F, Tay F, Pashley DH. et al. Setting time and expansion in different soaking media of experimental accelerated calcium-silicate cements and ProRoot MTA. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: e39-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Lau KH, Baylink DJ. Molecular mechanism of action of fluoride on bone cells. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13: 1660-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Watts JD, Holt DM, Beeson TJ, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE. Effects of pH and mixing agents on the temporal setting of tooth-colored and gray mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2007; 33: 970-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kogan P, He J, Glickman GN, Watanabe I. The effects of various additives on setting properties of MTA. J Endod 2006; 32: 569-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Parirokh M, Ghoddusi J, Kheirieh S, Brink F. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate's composition with Portland cements and a new endodontic cement. J Endod 2009; 35: 243-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar