CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2015; 09(04): 462-469
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.172616
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Evaluation of the effect of three supplementary oral hygiene measures on salivary mutans streptococci levels in children: A randomized comparative clinical trial

M. Manju
1   Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. Syamala Reddy Dental College Hospital and Research Center, Munnekolala, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
P. Prathyusha
2   Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, C.K.S Teja Institute of Dental Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
,
Elizabeth Joseph
3   Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Pushpagiri College of Dental Sciences, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India
,
Rupali Borkar Kaul
4   Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Darshan Dental College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
,
Srinivas L. Shanthraj
5   Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Virajpet, Karnataka, India
,
Ntasha Sethi
6   Consultant Pediatric Dentist, Total Dental Care, Najafgarh, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of tongue scraping, tongue brushing, and saturated saline on salivary MS levels. Materials and Methods: A single-blinded, randomized, parallel group clinical trial was conducted in children aged 9–12 years. Total sample of 45 subjects were randomly assigned to three groups, that is, Group A, Group B, and Group C comprised of 15 each. Group A, Group B, and Group C were asked to do tongue scraping, tongue brushing and saturated saline rinsing twice daily, respectively for 21 days. Saliva samples, collected from the subjects on the baseline, 7th day and 21st day, were inoculated on mitis salivarius bacitracin agar and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The mean streptococcal colony forming counts were enumerated. The data were subjected to statistical analysis using Wilcoxon signed rank sum test for intragroup comparisons and Mann–Whitney U-test for intergroup comparisons. Results: Intragroup comparisons showed statistically significant reduction in MS levels (P < 0.01). However, the intergroup comparisons showed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The oral hygiene measures evaluated proved equal efficacy in reducing the colony counts. Hence, there is a need to emphasize the importance of incorporating supplementary oral hygiene measures in daily oral care.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Shafer WG, Maynard KH, Barnet ML. A Textbook of Oral Pathology. 4th ed.. Philadelphia: W.B Sunders Company; 1993: p. 40
  • 2 Kristoffersson K, Gröndahl HG, Bratthall D. The more Streptococcus mutans, the more caries on approximal surfaces. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 58-61
  • 3 Sakeenabi B, Hiremath SS. Dental caries experience and salivary Streptococcus mutans, lactobacilli scores, salivary flow rate, and salivary buffering capacity among 6-year-old Indian school children. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2011; 1: 45-51
  • 4 Nishikawara F, Katsumura S, Ando A, Tamaki Y, Nakamura Y, Sato K. et al. Correlation of cariogenic bacteria and dental caries in adults. J Oral Sci 2006; 48: 245-51
  • 5 Pannu P, Gambhir R, Sujlana A. Correlation between the salivary Streptococcus mutans levels and dental caries experience in adult population of Chandigarh, India. Eur J Dent 2013; 7: 191-5
  • 6 White GE, Armaleh MT. Tongue scraping as a means of reducing oral mutans streptococci. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004; 28: 163-6
  • 7 Brambilla E, García-Godoy F, Strohmenger L. Principles of diagnosis and treatment of high-caries-risk subjects. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 507-40 , vi
  • 8 Matsui M, Chosa N, Shimoyama Y, Minami K, Kimura S, Kishi M. Effects of tongue cleaning on bacterial flora in tongue coating and dental plaque: A crossover study. BMC Oral Health 2014; 14: 4
  • 9 Allaker RP, Waite RD, Hickling J, North M, McNab R, Bosma MP. et al. Topographic distribution of bacteria associated with oral malodour on the tongue. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53 (Suppl. 01) S8-12
  • 10 Loesche WJ, Kazor C. Microbiology and treatment of halitosis. Periodontol 2000 2002; 28: 256-79
  • 11 Yaegaki K, Coil JM. Examination, classification, and treatment of halitosis; clinical perspectives. J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 66: 257-61
  • 12 Danser MM, Gómez SM, Van der Weijden GA. Tongue coating and tongue brushing: A literature review. Int J Dent Hyg 2003; 1: 151-8
  • 13 Christen AG, Swanson Jr BZ. Oral hygiene: A history of tongue scraping and brushing. J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 96: 215-9
  • 14 Christensen GJ. Why clean your tongue?. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 1605-7
  • 15 Kocak MM, Ozcan S, Kocak S, Topuz O, Erten H. Comparison of the efficacy of three different mouthrinse solutions in decreasing the level of Streptococcus mutans in saliva. Eur J Dent 2009; 3: 57-61
  • 16 Wan AK, Seow WK, Walsh LJ, Bird PS. Comparison of five selective media for the growth and enumeration of Streptococcus mutans . Aust Dent J 2002; 47: 21-6
  • 17 Gilmore EL, Bhaskar SN. Effect of tongue brushing on bacteria and plaque formed in vitro . J Periodontol 1972; 43: 418-22
  • 18 Axelsson P, Kristoffersson K, Karlsson R, Bratthall D. A 30-month longitudinal study of the effects of some oral hygiene measures on Streptococcus mutans and approximal dental caries. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 761-5
  • 19 Rupesh S, Winnier JJ, Nayak UA, Rao A, Reddy V, Peter J. The comparative evaluation of the effects of tongue cleaning on salivary levels of mutans streptococci in children. Int J Dent Hyg 2012; 10: 107-12
  • 20 Mourughan K, Suryakanth MP. Evaluation of an alum-containing mouthrinse for inhibition of salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in children – A controlled clinical trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2004; 22: 100-5
  • 21 Mcdonald JL. Nutritional considerations for pediatric dental patient. In: McDonald RE, Avery DR. editors. Dentistry for the Child and adolescent. 5th ed.. St.Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company; 1996: p. 287-300
  • 22 Mundorff SA, Eisenberg AD, Leverett DH, Espeland MA, Proskin HM. Correlations between numbers of microflora in plaque and saliva. Caries Res 1990; 24: 312-7
  • 23 Saravia ME, Nelson-Filho P, Silva RA, De Rossi A, Faria G, Silva LA. et al. Recovery of mutans streptococci on MSB, SB-20 and SB-20M agar media. Arch Oral Biol 2013; 58: 311-6
  • 24 Nurelhuda NM, Al-Haroni M, Trovik TA, Bakken V. Caries experience and quantification of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in saliva of Sudanese schoolchildren. Caries Res 2010; 44: 402-7
  • 25 Jiang Q, Yu M, Min Z, Yi A, Chen D, Zhang Q. AP-PCR detection of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in caries-free and caries-active subjects. Mol Cell Biochem 2012; 365: 159-64
  • 26 Sachse K, Frey J. editors. Methods in Molecular Biology: PCR Detection of Microbial Pathogens. Vol. 216 Totowa, N.J.: Humana Press Inc.; 2003
  • 27 Menon MV, Coykendall AL. Effect of tongue scraping. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1492
  • 28 Quirynen M, Avontroodt P, Soers C, Zhao H, Pauwels M, van Steenberghe D. Impact of tongue cleansers on microbial load and taste. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31: 506-10
  • 29 Pratibha PK, Bhat KM, Bhat GS. Oral malodor: A review of the literature. J Dent Hyg 2006; 80: 8
  • 30 Gondhalekar R, Richard KM, Jayachandra MG, Aslam S, Reddy VN, Barabde AS. Effect of tongue cleaning methods and oral mutans streptococci level. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14: 119-22
  • 31 Casemiro LA, Martins CH, de Carvalho TC, Panzeri H, Lavrador MA, Pires-de-Souza FdeC. Effectiveness of a new toothbrush design versus a conventional tongue scraper in improving breath odor and reducing tongue microbiota. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16: 271-4
  • 32 Almas K, Al-Sanawi E, Al-Shahrani B. The effect of tongue scraper on mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in patients with caries and periodontal disease. Odontostomatol Trop 2005; 28: 5-10
  • 33 Bordas A, McNab R, Staples AM, Bowman J, Kanapka J, Bosma MP. Impact of different tongue cleaning methods on the bacterial load of the tongue dorsum. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53 (Suppl. 01) S13-8
  • 34 Gulati MS, Gupta L. Clinical evaluation of supplementing tongue brushing to most advocated regime of tooth brushing. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 1998; 16: 12-6
  • 35 Winnier JJ, Rupesh S, Nayak UA, Reddy V, Prasad RaoA. The comparative evaluation of the effects of tongue cleaning on existing plaque levels in children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013; 6: 188-92
  • 36 De Boever EH, Loesche WJ. Assessing the contribution of anaerobic microflora of the tongue to oral malodor. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 1384-93
  • 37 Rupesh S, Winnier JJ, Nayak UA, Rao AP, Reddy NV. Comparative evaluation of the effects of an alum-containing mouthrinse and a saturated saline rinse on the salivary levels of Streptococcus mutans . J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2010; 28: 138-44