Differences between centric relation and maximum intercuspation as possible cause for development of temporomandibular disorder analyzed with T-scan III

Zana D. Lila-Krasniqi; Kujtim Sh. Shala; Teuta Pustina-Krasniqi; Teuta Bicaj; Linda J. Dula; Ljuben Guguvčevski

doi:10.4103/1305-7456.172627

European Journal of Dentistry, Inhaltsverzeichnis

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2015; 09(04): 573-579
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.172627

Original Article

Dental Investigation Society

Differences between centric relation and maximum intercuspation as possible cause for development of temporomandibular disorder analyzed with T-scan III

Zana D. Lila-Krasniqi

¹Department of Prosthetics, Faculty of Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pristina, Kosovo

,

Kujtim Sh. Shala

¹Department of Prosthetics, Faculty of Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pristina, Kosovo

,

Teuta Pustina-Krasniqi

¹Department of Prosthetics, Faculty of Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pristina, Kosovo

,

Teuta Bicaj

¹Department of Prosthetics, Faculty of Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pristina, Kosovo

,

Linda J. Dula

¹Department of Prosthetics, Faculty of Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pristina, Kosovo

,

Ljuben Guguvčevski

²Department of Prosthetics, Faculty of Dentistry, Skopje, Macedonia

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

als PDF herunterladen

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare subjects from the group with fixed dentures, the group who present temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and a control group considering centric relation (CR) and maximum intercuspation (MIC)/habitual occlusion (Hab. Occl.) and to analyze the related variables also compared and analyzed with electronic system T-scan III. Materials and Methods: A total of 54 subjects were divided into three groups; 17 subjects with fixed dentures, 14 with TMD and 23 controls-selection based on anamnesis-responded to a Fonseca questionnaire and clinical measurements analyzed with electronic system T-scan III. Occlusal force, presented by percentage (automatically by the T-scan electronic system) was analyzed in CR and in MIC. Results: Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation and differences in P < 0.05 were considered significant. After measurements of the differences between CR and MIC in the three groups were noticed varieties but the P > 0.05 it was not significant in all three groups. Conclusion: In our study, it was concluded that there are not statistically significant differences between CR and MIC in the group of individuals without any symptom or sign of TMD although there are noticed in the group with TMD and fixed dentures disharmonic relation between the arches with overload of the occlusal force on the one side.

Key words:

Centric relation - dental occlusion - maximum intercuspation - temporomandibular disorder

PDF (1887 kb)

Referenzen

REFERENCES
1 Vojdani M, Bahrani F, Ghadiri P. The study of relationship between reported temporomandibular symptoms and clinical dysfunction index among university students in Shiraz. Dent Res J 2012; 9: 221-5
2 Palaskar JN, Murali R, Bansal S. Centric relation definition: A historical and contemporary prosthodontic perspective. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013; 13: 149-54
3 Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S. Centric relation: A historical and contemporary orthodontic perspective. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 494-501
4 Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 5th ed.. St. Louis MO: Mosby Year Book Elsevier; 2003: 416 418, 605
5 Schiffman E. Mandibular dysfunction, occlusal dysfunction, and parafunctional habits in a non-clinical population. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 306-14
6 McNamara JA, Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment and temporomandibular disorders: A review. J Orofac Pain 1995; 9: 73-90
7 Turp JC, Schindler HJ, Rodiger O, Smeekens S, Marinello CP. Vertical and horizontal jaw relations in reconstructive dentistry: A critical review. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2006; 116: 403-17
8 Turp JC, Greene CS, Strub JR. Dental occlusion: A critical reflection on past, present and future concepts. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 446-53
9 Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1972; 62: 296-309
10 Dawson PE. Optimum TMJ condyle position in clinical practice. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985; 5: 10-7
11 Celenza FV. The centric position: Replacement and character. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 30: 591
12 Serrano PT, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA. Centric relation change during therapy with corrective occlusion prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 97-105
13 Dawson PE. New definition for relating occlusion to varying conditions of the temporomandibular joint. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 619-27
14 Bansal S, Palaskar J. Critical evaluation of various methods of recording centric jaw relation. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2008; 8: 185-91
15 Bansal S, Palaskar J. Critical evaluation of methods to record centric jaw relation. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2009; 9: 120-26
16 Keshvad A, Winstanley RB. An appraisal of the literature on centric relation. Part 3. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 55-63
17 Hickey JC. Centric relation, a must for complete dentures. Dent Clin North Am 1964; 8: 587-600
18 Hughes GA, Regli CP. What is centric relation?. J Prosthet Dent 1961; 11: 16-22
19 Pokorny PH, Wiens JP, Litvak H. Occlusion for fixed prosthodontics: a historical perspective of the gnathological influence. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99: 299-313
20 Weffort SY, de Fantini SM. Condylar displacement between centric relation and maximum intercuspation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Angle Orthodontist 2010; 80: 835-42
21 Ferreira AF, Henriques JCG, Almeida GA, Machado AR, Machado NAG, Fernandes NetoAJ. Comparative analysis between mandibular positions in centric relation and maximum intercuspation by cone beam computed tomography (CONE-BEAM). J Appl Oral 2009; 17: 27-34
22 Utt TW, Meyers Jr CE, Wierzba TF, Hondrum SO. A threedimensional comparison of condylar position changes between centric relation and centric occlusion using the mandibular position indicator. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 298-308
23 Cabral CWLF, Silva FA, Silva WA, Landulpho AB, Silva LB. Comparison between two methods to record occlusal contacts in habitual maximal intercuspation. Braz J Oral Sci 2006; 5: 1239-43
24 Schildkraut M, Wood DP, Hunter WS. The CR-CO discrepancy and its effect on cephalometric measurements. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 333-42
25 García VCG, Cartagena AG, Sequeros OF. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation using the T-Scan system. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 899-903
26 Fantini SM, Paiva JB, Rino NetoJ, Dominguez GC, Abrão J, Vigoritto JW. Increase of condylar displacement between centric relation and maximal habitual intercuspation after occlusal splint therapy. Braz Oral Res 2005; 19: 176-82
27 Lima AF, Cavalcanti AN, Martins LR. Marchi.. Occlusal Interferences: How Can This Concept Influence The Clinical Practice?. Eur J Dent 2010; 4: 487-9
28 Seligman DA, Pullinger AG. The role of intercuspal occlusal relationships in temporomandibular disorders: A review. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 1991; 5: 96-106
29 Le Bell Y, Niemi PM, Jamsa T, Kylmala M, Alanen P. Subjective reactions to intervention with artificial interferences in subjects with and without a history of temporomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand 2006; 64: 59-63
30 Niemi PM, Le Bell Y, Kylmala M, Jamsa T, Alanen P. Psychological factors and responses to artificial interferences in subjects with and without a history of temporomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand 2006; 64: 300-5
31 Barbosa GAS, Badaró FilhoCR, Fonseca RB, Soares CJ, Neves FD, Fernandes NetoAJ. The role of occlusion and occlusal adjustment on temporomandibular dysfunction. Braz J Oral Sci 2004; 3: 589-94
32 Le Bell Y, Jamsa T, Korri S, Niemi PM, Alanen P. Effect of artificial occlusal interferences depends on previous experience of temporomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60: 219-22
33 Tsukiyama Y, Baba K, Clark GT. An evidence-based assessment of occlusal adjustment as a treatment for temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 57-66
34 Kirveskari P, Alanen P. Occlusal variables are only moderately useful in the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorder. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 114-5
35 Crawford SD. Condylar axis position, as determined by occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction. Angle Orthod 1999; 69: 103-14
36 Cordray FE. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: A prospective study. Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Ortho 2006; 129: 619-30
37 Da Fonseca DM, Bonfante G, Valle AL, de Freitas SFT. Diagnosis of the craniomandibular dysfunction through anamnesis. Rev Gaucha de Odontologia 1994; 4: 23-32
38 Bevilaqua-Grossi D, Chaves TC, Oliveira AS, Monteiro-Pedro V. Anamnestic Index severity and signs and symptoms of TMD. J Cranio Practice 2006; 24: 112-8
39 Kerstein RB. Current Applications of Computerized Occlusal Analysis in Dental Medicine. USA Gen Dent 2001; 49: 521-30
40 Kerstein RB. Articulating paper mark misconceptions and computerized occlusal analysis technology. Dent Implantol Update 2008; 19: 41-6
41 Kerstein RB, Wilkerson DW. Locating the centric relation prematurity with a computerized occlusal analysis system. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001; 22: 525-32
42 Baltrusaityte A, Surna A, Pileicikiene G, Kubilius R, Gleiznys A, Zilinskas J. The relationship between unilateral mandibular angle fracture and temporomandibular joint function. Stomatologija 2014; 16: 87-93
43 Cheng HJ, Geng Y, Zhang FQ. The evaluation of intercuspal occlusion of healthy people with T-Scan II system. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2012; 21: 62-5
44 Harvey WL, Osborne JW, Hatch RA. A preliminary test of the replicability of a computerized occlusal analysis system. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 697-700
45 Harvey WL, Hatch RA, Osborne JW. Computerized occlusal analysis: an evaluation of the sensors. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 89-92
46 Olivieri F, Kang KH, Hirayama H, Maness WL. New method for analyzing complete denture occlusion using the center of force concept: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 519-23
47 Liu CW, Chang YM, Shen YF, Hong HH. Using the T-scan III system to analyze occlusal function in mandibular reconstruction patients: A pilot study. Biomed J 2015; 38: 52-7
48 Nomura K, Vitti M, de Oliveira AS, Chaves CT, Semprini M, Siessere S. et al. Use of the Fonseca's Questionnaire to Assess the Prevalence and Severity of Temporomandibular Disorders in Brazilian Dental Undergraduates. Braz Dent J 2007; 18: 163-7
49 De Oliveira AS, Dias EM, Contato RG, Berzin F. Prevalence study of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder in Brazilian college students. Brazilian Oral Research 2006; 20: 3-7
50 Magnusson T, Egermark I, Carlsson GE. A longitudinal epidemiologic study of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders from 15 to 35 years of age. J Orofac Pain 2000; 14: 10-9
51 Klasser GD, Greene CS. The changing field of temporomandibular disorders: What dentists need to know. J Can Dent Assoc 2009; 75: 49-53
52 Sadowsky C, Polson AM. Temporomandibular disorders and functional occlusion after orthodontic treatment: Results of two long term studies. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 385-90
53 Campos JADB, Goncalves DAG, Camparis CM, Speciali JG. Reliability of a questionnaire for diagnosing the severity of temporomandibular disorder. Rev Bras Fisioter 2009; 13: 38-43
54 Forrester SE, Presswood RG, Toy AC, Pain MT. Occlusal measurement method can affect SEMG activity during occlusion. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38: 655-60
55 Baba K, Tsukiyama Y, Clark GT. Reliability, validity, and utility of various occlusal measurement methods and techniques. J of Prosthetic Den 2000; 83: 83-9
56 Egermark-Eriksson I, Carlsson GE, Magnusson T, Thilander B. A longitudinal study on malocclusion in relation to signs and symptoms of cranio-mandibular disorders in children and adolescents. Eur J Orthod 1990; 12: 399-407
57 Pullinger AG, Seligman DA, Solberg WK. Temporomandibular disorders. Part II: Occlusal factors associated with temporomandibular joint tenderness and dysfunction. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1988; 59: 363-67
58 Turasi B, Ari-Demirkaya A, Biren S. Comparison of increased overjet cases and controls: normative data for condylar positions. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 129-35