CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2018; 13(02): 238-246
DOI: 10.4103/1793-5482.228512
Original Article

Spinal cerebrospinal fluid drainage for prevention of vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A prospective, randomized controlled study

Sachin Borkar
Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
,
Manmohanjit Singh
Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
,
Shashank Kale
Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
,
Ashish Suri
Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
,
Poodipedi Chandra
Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
,
Rajender Kumar
Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
,
Bhawani Sharma
Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
,
Shailesh Gaikwad
1   Department of Neuroradiolgy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
,
Ashok Mahapatra
Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
› Author Affiliations

Introduction: Cerebral vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. Despite various treatment modalities, the optimal management of vasospasm remains elusive. In this regard; we undertook a prospective, randomized controlled study to evaluate the effectiveness of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage (LCSFD) for prevention of cerebral vasospasm and its sequelae. Materials and Methods: Patients with aneurysmal SAH who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups – Group I (30 patients) underwent LCSFD whereas Group II (30 patients) did not undergo LCSFD. All patients underwent aneurysmal clipping. Both the groups received standard neurosurgical treatment except for LCSFD. The outcome was measured in terms of (1) clinically evident vasospasm; (2) vasospasm-related cerebral infarction; (3) condition of the patient at the time of discharge; and (4) Glasgow outcome score (GOS) at 1- and 3-month follow-up. Results: LCSFD conferred a statistically significant benefit reducing the incidence of clinical vasospasm from 63% (in non-LCSFD group) to 30% (in LCSFD group) (P = 0.01) and incidence of vasospasm-related cerebral infarction from 53% (in non-LCSFD group) to 20% (in LCSFD group) (P = 0.007). Incidence of vasospasm was quantitatively lower in LCSFD group across all Hunt and Hess grades; however, it was statistically significant in SAH Grade III (P = 0.008). Mean duration of hospital stay was slightly lower in LCSFD group compared to non-LCSFD group; however, it did not reach statistical significance. A higher incidence of meningitis in LCSFD group was not statistically significant. A higher GOS was observed in LCSFD group at 1- and 3-month follow-up as compared to non-LCSFD group. Conclusion: Drainage of CSF through a lumbar drain following aneurysmal SAH caused a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of clinical and radiological vasospasm and its sequelae. It also shortens the overall duration of hospital stay and improves the outcome as evidenced by a better GOS score at 1- and 3-month follow-up. The results of this prospective, randomized study establish the efficacy of LCSFD in prevention of vasospasm following aneurysmal SAH.



Publication History

Article published online:
14 September 2022

© 2018. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India