CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences 2010; 02(01): 24-31
DOI: 10.4103/1947-489X.210965
Article

The comparative effectiveness of isokinetic and isotonic strength trainings on quadriceps maximum power

H Agnihotri
Department of Physiotherapy, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India
,
S Kapoor
Department of Physiotherapy, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India
› Author Affiliations

The present study compares the effectiveness of isokinetic and Isotonic exercises on maximum power of quadriceps in 45 healthy young males. The subjects were randomly assigned into three groups (n=15): Group A- Isokinetic group, Group B- Isotonic group, Group C-Control group. Maximum power of quadriceps at velocities of 220°/sec, 160°/sec 100°/sec and 40°/sec was tested twice with a gap of 4 weeks using isokinetic dynamometer. The isokinetic protocol consisted of one set of ten repetitions at velocities of 220°/sec, 160°/sec, 100°/sec, and 40°/sec each while, the Isotonic protocol included three sets of 10 repetitions at 50% 10 RM, 75% 10 RM and 100% 10 RM. Each exercise protocol was performed thrice a week for four weeks with 1 minute rest interval. The subjects in the control group were not prescribed any kind of exercise training. Paired t-test showed significant changes at 220°/sec (t=7.15, p<0.001), 160°/sec (t=7.54, p<0.001), 100°/sec (t=9.24, p<0.001) and 40°/sec (t=7.59, p<0.001) in Group A, also at 2200/ sec (t=8.56, p<0.001), 160°/sec (t=8.80, p<0.001), 1000/ sec (t=10.11, p<0.001) and 40°/sec (t=10.50, p<0.001) in Group B and non-significant changes in Group C. Post-test One way ANOVA revealed significant changes at 220°/sec (F= 10.85, p<0.001), 160°/sec (F=16.96, p<0.001), 1000/ sec (F=14.60, p<0.001) and 40°/sec (F=14.00, p<0.001). Isotonic exercises were found to be more effective than Isokinetic exercises in increasing the maximum power at high velocity.



Publication History

Received: 11 September 2009

Accepted: 26 October 2009

Article published online:
23 May 2022

© 2010. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India