CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2013; 2(03): 235-240
DOI: 10.4103/2278-9626.115992
Review Article

A simplified model for biomedical waste management in dental practices - A pilot project at Thane, India

Om N. Baghele
Department of Periodontology and Public Health Dentistry, SMBT Dental College and Hospital, Sangamner, Maharashtra, India
,
Subodh Phadke
1   Officials, Indian Dental Association, Maharashtra State Branch, India
2   Private Dental Practice, Thane, Maharashtra, India
,
Ashish A. Deshpande
1   Officials, Indian Dental Association, Maharashtra State Branch, India
2   Private Dental Practice, Thane, Maharashtra, India
,
Jayant P. Deshpande
1   Officials, Indian Dental Association, Maharashtra State Branch, India
2   Private Dental Practice, Thane, Maharashtra, India
,
Mangala O. Baghele
2   Private Dental Practice, Thane, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

A lot of biomedical waste (BMW) is generated in dental practices, which can be hazardous to the environment as well as to those who come in contact with the materials, if not dealt with appropriately. Most of the rules world-wide are not specific for dental BMW management and hinder easy understanding by dental practitioners. Because of lack of clear-cut guidelines either from Dental Council of India or Government of India or Indian Dental Association (IDA) on disposal of dental wastes, this article is designed to explore and review on these issues and formulate a simplified scheme. The guidelines by the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board from the directives of The Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India through BMW (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998, (BMW-MH-98), similar guidelines being followed elsewhere in the world, the local BMW disposal company’s rules and the IDA’s Clinic Standardization Program guidelines. We developed and implemented a simplified waste segregation protocol for practicing dentists and dental hospitals. A methodological dental waste segregation protocol was required considering its disposal and ill-effects on health and the environment. The simplified scheme provided a good model to be followed in developing countries like India. The scheme improved understanding among dentists because of its self-explanatory nature.



Publication History

Article published online:
01 November 2021

© 2013. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Notification by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India, New Delhi, 20 th July, 1998. Available from: http://www.envfor.nic.in/legis/hsm/biomed.html. [Recently accessed on 2012 Feb 21].
  • 2 Hegde V, Kulkarni RD, Ajantha GS. Biomedical waste management. J Oral Maxfac Path 2007;11:5-9. Available from: http://www.jomfp.in/temp/JOralMaxillofacPathol1115-5697414_013457.pdf. [Recently accessed on 2012 Feb 21].
  • 3 Pruss A, Cirouit E, Rushbrook P. Safe management of wastes from health care activities, WHO, 1999. Available from: http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/medicalwaste/wastemanag/en/. [Recently accessed on 2012 Feb 21].
  • 4 Park K. Hospital waste management. In: Park K, editor. Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. 17 th ed. Jabalpur (India): Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers; 2002. p. 563-7.
  • 5 American Dental Association. Best Management Practices for Amalgam Waste, Oct. 2007. Available from: http://www.ada.org/sections/publicResources/pdfs/topics_amalgamwaste.pdf. [Recently accessed on 2012 Feb 21].
  • 6 Leistevuo J, Leistevuo T, Helenius H, Pyy L, Huovinen P, Tenovuo J. Mercury in saliva and the risk of exceeding limits for sewage in relation to exposure to amalgam fillings. Arch Environ Health 2002;57:366-70.
  • 7 Sturdevant CM, Barton RE, Sockwell CL, Strickland WD. The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 2 nd ed. St. Louis: The CV Mosby Company; 1996. p. 154-6, 199.
  • 8 Crawford JJ. Office sterilization and asepsis procedures in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1979;23:717-35.
  • 9 ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. Dental mercury hygiene recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1498-9.
  • 10 Sudhakar V, Chandrashekar J. Dental health care waste disposal among private dental practices in Bangalore City, India. Int Dent J 2008;58:51-4.
  • 11 Kontogianni S, Xirogiannopoulou A, Karagiannidis A. Investigating solid waste production and associated management practices in private dental units. Waste Manag 2008;28:1441-8.
  • 12 Darwish RO, Al-Khatib IA. Evaluation of dental waste management in two cities in Palestine. East Mediterr Health J 2006;12:S217-22.
  • 13 Veronesi L, Bonanini M, Dall′Aglio P, Pizzi S, Manfiedi M, Tanzi ML. Health hazard evaluation in private dental practices: A survey in a province of northen Italy. Acta Biomed 2004;75:50-5.
  • 14 Punchanuwat K, Drummond BK, Treasure ET. An investigation of the disposal of dental clinical waste in Bangkok. Int Dent J 1998;48:369-73.
  • 15 Lönnroth EC, Shahnavaz H. Dental clinics - A burden to environment? Swed Dent J 1996;20:173-81.
  • 16 Kishore J, Goel P, Sagar B, Joshi TK. Awareness about biomedical waste management and infection control among dentists of a teaching hospital in New Delhi, India. Indian J Dent Res 2000;11:157-61.
  • 17 Keene JH. Medical waste: A minimal hazard. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:682-5.
  • 18 Rutala WA, Mayhall CG. Medical waste. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:38-48.
  • 19 Cocchiarella L, Deitchman SD, Young DC. Report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Biohazardous waste management: What the physician needs to know. American Medical Association. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:26-9.
  • 20 ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. Managing silver and lead waste in dental offices. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1095-6.
  • 21 Batchu H, Chou HN, Rakowski D, Fan PL. The effect of disinfectants and line cleaners on the release of mercury from amalgam. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1419-25.
  • 22 Fan PL, Batchu H, Chou HN, Gasparac W, Sandrik J, Meyer DM. Laboratory evaluation of amalgam separators. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:577-84.
  • 23 Batchu H, Rakowski D, Fan PL, Meyer DM. Evaluating amalgam separators using an international standard. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:999-1005.
  • 24 McManus KR, Fan PL. Purchasing, installing and operating dental amalgam separators: Practical issues. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1054-65.
  • 25 ADA Guidelines on Amalgam Accumulations in Dental Office Plumbing, August 2005. Available from: http://www.ada.org/sections/professionalResources/pdfs/amalgam_plumbing_guidelines.pdf. [Recently accessed on 2012 Feb 21].
  • 26 Rutala WA, Odette RL, Samsa GP. Management of infectious waste by US hospitals. JAMA 1989;262:1635-40.