Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2017; 6(01): 22-28
DOI: 10.4103/2278-9626.198603
Original Article

Mobile learning practices and preferences a way forward in enhancing dental education learning experience

Jane Manakil
School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
,
Roy George
School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective: To explore undergraduate dental students′ mobile technological preferences and their use in learning and patient management in dentistry. Materials and Methods: An online survey questionnaire (62 Questions in five parts) was designed to investigate the impact of mobile technology in dental education amongst the Bachelor in Dental Science and Graduate Dental Science (1st-5th year) students, at the School of Dentistry, Griffith University, Australia. Participation was voluntary. Results: In total, 251 dental students consented to participate in the study. The majority of participants were in the age group of 18-25 (65.3%). Mobile devices were used by 93.2% of the respondents for various activities including for educational purposes. Laptops and smartphones′ ownership was almost similar; however, 75.7% favoured laptop as the primary device for resource storage, study, research, and organization of study materials. Social media were used by 52% of the 5th year respondents for studies and course-related activities. Majority of the students (78.8%) indicated that mobile devices with their software applications could positively assist in patient education and management; however, the relative lack of user-friendly quality applications meant that only 15%-25% of students used software applications for these purposes. Conclusion: The large student ownership of mobile devices and increased interest in its use to enhance learning experiences should encourage universities and software developers to funding research into mobile learning.

Keywords

Dental education - mobile learning - mobile technology - smart mobile devices


Publication History

Article published online:
01 November 2021

© 2017. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Fabry D, Higgs J. Barriers to the effective use of technology in education: Current status. J Educ Comput Res 1997;17:385-95.
  • 2 Yip HK, Barnes I. Learning in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 1997;1:54-60.
  • 3 Gikas J, Grant MM. Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones and; social media. Internet High Educ 2013;19:18-26.
  • 4 Liaw SS, Huang HM. Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Comput Educ 2010;54:446-54.
  • 5 Kirkwood A, Price L. Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is "enhanced" and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learn Media Technol 2013;39:6-36.
  • 6 Chu HC, Hwang GJ, Tsai CC, Tseng CR. A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Comput Educ 2010;55:1618-27.
  • 7 Mishra P, Koehler JM. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teach Coll Rec 2006;108:1017-54.
  • 8 Motorola. How Wireless Networks are Transforming E-learning. Over View: The Increasing Use of Wireless Networks in K-12 Higher Education environment. Motorola Wireless Network Barometer Study. 2010. Available from: http://www.motorolasolutions.com/content/dam/msi/docs/business/_documents/white_paper/_static_files/wp_educationbarom_final.pdf. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 21].
  • 9 Niess ML. Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teach Teach Educ 2005;21:509-23.
  • 10 Chen B, deNoyelles A. Exploring students′ mobile learning practices in higher education. In: EDUCASE Review. 2013. Accessed from: http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/10/exploring-students-mobile-learning-practices-in-higher-education. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 22].
  • 11 Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2006;81:207-12.
  • 12 Venkatesh V, Morris GM, Davis BG, Davis DF. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q 2003;27:425-78.
  • 13 Wang YS, Wu MC, Wang HY. Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. Br J Educ Technol 2009;40:92-118.
  • 14 Ally M. Mobile learning: From research to practice to impact education. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives. Vol. 10. 2013. Available from: http://lthe.zu.ac.ae/index.php/lthehome/article/view/140. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 22].
  • 15 Abu-Al-Aish A, Love S. Factors influencing students′ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 2013;14. Available from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1631. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 21].
  • 16 Gordon N. Flexible Pedagogies: Technology-enhanced learning. HEA 2014. Accessed from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/tel_report_0.pdf. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 21].
  • 17 Martin F, Ertzberger J. Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Comput Educ 2013;68:76-85.
  • 18 Alexander, "M-Learning: Emergent Pedagogical and Campus Issues in the Mobile Learning Environment," EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Bulletin, vol. 2004, no. 16 (August 2004), a publication of ECAR (http://www.educause.edu/ecar/).
  • 19 Johnson CE, Hurtubise LC, Castrop J, French G, Groner J, Ladinsky M, et al. Learning management systems: Technology to measure the medical knowledge competency of the ACGME. Med Educ 2004;38:599-608.
  • 20 Phelps C, Michea YF. Learning management systems′ evaluation focuses on technology not learning. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003;2003:969.
  • 21 Heath B, Herman R, Lugo G, Reeves J, Vetter R, Ward CR. Developing a mobile learning environment to support virtual education communities. T H E J 2005;32:33-7.
  • 22 Oakley M, Spallek H. Social media in dental education: A call for research and action. J Dent Educ 2012;76:279-87.
  • 23 Ponce BA, Determann JR, Boohaker HA, Sheppard E, McGwin G Jr., Theiss S. Social networking profiles and professionalism issues in residency applicants: An original study-cohort study. J Surg Educ 2013;70:502-7.
  • 24 Maloney S, Moss A, Ilic D. Social media in health professional education: A student perspective on user levels and prospective applications. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2014;19:687-97.
  • 25 Divaris K, Barlow PJ, Chendea SA, Cheong WS, Dounis A, Dragan IF, et al. The academic environment: The students′ perspective. Eur J Dent Educ 2008;12 Suppl 1:120-30.
  • 26 Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, Gandhi T, Kittler A, Volk L, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: Making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. JAMIA 2003;10:523-30.
  • 27 Malkary G. Healthcare without Bounds: Point of Care Communications for Physicians. Menlo Park, CA: Spyglass Consulting Group; 2014.
  • 28 Jakob N, P Kara. Eyetracking Web Usability, Society for Technical Communication: FAIRFAX; 2010. p. 428-9.
  • 29 Williams P, Rowlands I. The Literature on Young People and their Information Behaviour, in Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future, A British Library/JISC Study; 2008.
  • 30 Yýlmaz Ö, Sanalan VA. M-learning: M-learning applications, students input for M-learning in science instruction. World J Educ 2011;1:172.
  • 31 Kirkwood A, Price L. Missing: Evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teach High Educ 2013;18:327-37.
  • 32 Lai C, Hwang G, Liang J, Liang JC, Tsai CC. Differences between mobile learning environmental preferences of high school teachers and students in Taiwan: A structural equation model analysis. Educ Technol Res Dev 2016;64:533-54.
  • 33 Greenhow C, Lewin C. Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learn Media Technol 2016;41:6-30.
  • 34 Merchant G. Mobile practices in everyday life: Popular digital technologies and schooling revisited. Br J Educ Technol 2012;43:770-82.
  • 35 Park Y. A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 2011;12:25.