J Neuroanaesth Crit Care 2015; 02(02): 110-113
DOI: 10.4103/2348-0548.154235
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

To compare the effects of multiple sessions of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in neurological improvement in head injury patients: A prospective randomized trial

Amlendu Yadav
1   Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Mridula Pawar
1   Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Rakesh Garg
1   Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Neerja Banerjee
1   Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 May 2018 (online)

Abstract

Introduction: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is used to improve functional outcome following brain injuries. Different number of sessions of HBOT have been reported but the frequency of HBOT sessions in head injured patients has not been standardized. We planned this prospective randomized study with an aim to compare the neurological effects of 10, 20 and 30 sessions of HBOT in the head injured patients. Materials and Methods: After review board approval, this study was conducted in 60 head injury patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤ 9. All patients were resuscitated, stabilized and received neurological care according to institutional protocol. Patients were randomly allotted to–Group H10 (n-20)–which received 10 sittings of HBOT, Group H20 (n-20)–which received 20 sittings of HBOT, Group H30 (n-30)–which received 30 sittings of HBOT. GCS score was recorded after every 10 sittings and at 30 days from initiation of HBOT. Improvement Global rating and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) were recorded after 30 days. Results: The maximum improvement in GCS scores was seen in group H30. The difference in the average improvement global rating scale was significant between group H10 and group H20, between group H10 and group H30 but was comparable between groups H20 and H30. The GOS was better after 30 sessions as compared to 10 sessions. Patients of all groups showed improvement in spasticity but group H30 showed a maximum improvement. Conclusion: A minimum of 30 HBOT sessions should be considered in head injury patients to show improvement with HBOT. Progressive improvement in GCS scores, GOS, spasticity, mood swings was better seen with increased number of HBOT sessions.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Algattas H, Huang JH. Traumatic brain injury pathophysiology and treatments: Early, intermediate and late phases post injury. Int J Mol Sci 2014; 15: 309-41
  • 2 Huang L, Obenaus A. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for traumatic brain injury. Med Gas Res 2011; 1: 21
  • 3 Gill AL, Bell CN. Hyperbaric oxygen: Its uses, mechansim of action and outcomes. QJM 2004; 97: 385-95
  • 4 Lin JW, Tsai JT, Lee LM, Lin CM, Hung CC, Hung KS. et al. Effect of hyperbaric oxygen on patients with traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2008; 101: 145-9
  • 5 Chorr V, Canini F, De Rudnicki S, Dahmani S, Gressens P, Constantin P. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and inert gases in cerbral ischaemia and traumatic brain injury. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2013; 32: 863-71
  • 6 Bennett MH, Trytko B, Jonker B. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the adjunctive treatment of traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12
  • 7 Rockswold SB, Rockswold GL, Defillo A. Hyperbaric oxygen in traumatic brain injury. Neurol Res 2007; 29: 162-72
  • 8 Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness-A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81-4
  • 9 Tsevat J, Dawson NV, Matchar DB. Assessing quality of life and preferences in the seriously ill using utility theory. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 73-7
  • 10 deGuise E, leBlanc J, Feyz M, Meyer K, Duplantie J, Thomas H. et al. Long-term outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: The McGill interdisciplinary prospective study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2008; 23: 294-303
  • 11 Lingsma HF, Roozenbeek B, Steyernerg EW, Murray GD, Maas AI. Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: From prophecies to predictions. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 543-54
  • 12 Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth Scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1986; 67: 206-7
  • 13 McDonaugh M, Helfand M, Carson S, Russman BS. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for traumatic brain injury: A systematic review of the evidence. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1198-204
  • 14 Mao JH, Sun ZS, Xiang Y. Observation of curative effects of hyperbaric oxygen for treatment on severe craniocerebral injury. J Clin Neurol 2010; 23: 386-68
  • 15 Golden ZL, Neubauer R, Golden CJ, Greene L, Marsh J, Mleko A. Improvement in cerebral metabolism in chronic brain injury after hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Int J Neurosci 2002; 112: 119-31
  • 16 Plafki C, Peters P, Almeling M, Welslau W, Busch R. Complications and side effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Aviat Space Environ Med 2000; 71: 119-24
  • 17 Rockswold SB, Rockswold GL, Zaun DA, Zhang X, Cerra CE, Bergman TA. et al. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to compare the effect of hyperbaric to normobaric hyperoxia on cerebral metabolism, intracranial pressure, and oxygen toxicity in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2010; 112: 1080-94