CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neuroanaesth Crit Care 2016; 03(03): 227-232
DOI: 10.4103/2348-0548.190068
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Awareness of Glasgow Coma Scale in anaesthesiology post-graduates in India: A survey

Shikha Bansal
1   Department of Anaesthesiology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
,
Rajiv Chawla
1   Department of Anaesthesiology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 May 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a universal clinical means of quantifying the level of impaired consciousness. It has completed 40 years and has stood the test of time. The assessment is best when done by trained personnel. Anaesthesiologists often manage unconscious patients. Thus, they must be well versed with GCS. This survey aimed to assess the awareness of GCS in anaesthesiology post-graduates in India. Methods: A questionnaire-based survey was carried out in 250 anaesthesiology post-graduates attending a refresher course in September 2014. Subjects and Methods: The questionnaire had 14 questions. Four questions were about the respondent, 5 questions on theoretical information and 5 questions on clinical scenarios. The available data were analysed using Epi Info. Results were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05. Results: Response was received from 174 students (response rate: 70%). Ninety percent of students felt that GCS is important in assessing unconscious patients, 94% students used GCS for unconscious patients. Fifty-eight percent of students have been formally trained in GCS. Mean of correct answers to theoretical questions was 3.98 ± 0.71. Mean of correct answers to clinical questions was 3.2 ± 1.24. Difference between the two means is 0.78. This difference is considered to be statistically significant with P < 0.0001. Conclusions: While the post-graduates are well versed with ‘theoretical aspects’ of GCS, they need to strengthen their skills on clinical application. Hence, there is a need for reinforcement of GCS training for anaesthesiology post-graduates.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Teasdale G, Allan D, Brennan P, McElhinney E, Mackinnon L. Forty years on: Updating the Glasgow Coma Scale. Nurs Times 2014; 110: 12-6
  • 2 Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, Manley G, Stocchetti N, Murray G. The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: Standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 844-54
  • 3 Yusuf AS, Salaudeen AG, Adewale AA, Babalola OM. Knowledge of Glasgow Coma Scale by physicians in a tertiary health institution in Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 2013; 20: 34-8
  • 4 Heim C, Schoettker P, Gilliard N, Spahn DR. Knowledge of Glasgow Coma Scale by air-rescue physicians. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009; 17: 39
  • 5 Gould D, Kelly D, White I, Chidgey J. Training needs analysis. A literature review and reappraisal. Int J Nurs Stud 2004; 41: 471-86
  • 6 Reith FC, Brennan PM, Maas AI, Teasdale GM. Lack of standardization in the use of the Glasgow Coma Scale: Results of international surveys. J Neurotrauma 2016; 33: 89-94
  • 7 Adeleye AO, Owolabi MO, Rabiu TB, Orimadegun AE. Physicians’ knowledge of the Glasgow Coma Scale in a Nigerian university hospital: Is the simple GCS still too complex?. Front Neurol 2012; 3: 28
  • 8 Emejulu J, Nkwerem S, Ekweogwu OC. Assessment of physicians’ knowledge of Glasgow coma score. Niger J Clin Pract 2014; 17: 729-34
  • 9 Mattar I, Liaw SY, Chan MF. A study to explore nurses’ knowledge in using the Glasgow Coma Scale in an acute care hospital. J Neurosci Nurs 2013; 45: 272-80