Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2018; 10(02): 135-139
DOI: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_145_17
Original Article

One-sample two-smear versus two-sample two-smear approach for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

T. Jaya Chandra
Department of Microbiology, GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations Financial support and sponsorship Nil.
› Further Information
Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of one-sputum sample two-smear approach for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from January 2012 to December 2015 were analyzed to find (1) number of smear positives (SPs) by spot (S) sample with one and two smears; (2) number of SPs by morning (M) sample with one and two smears; and (iii) number of SPs by two samples with two smears, that is, same-day (SS2) and spot morning (SM) approaches. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the statistical difference in SP cases.

RESULTS: With one-sample two-smear approach, the smear positivity (SPT) was 87% and 87.5%, for S and M samples, respectively, for Ziehl–Neelsen (ZN) staining; whereas, SPT was 96% and 97%, respectively, for S and M samples, for fluorescent staining (FS) technique. With two-sample two-smear approach, for ZN staining, SPT was 89% each and for FS technique, SPT was 97% and 99%, respectively, for SS2 and SM approaches. The difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05) between one- and two-sample approaches in the staining techniques.

CONCLUSION: Significant number of SP cases are identified by S sample two-smear approach. Thus, the World Health Organization/Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme can initiate S sample two-smear approach for the diagnosis of PT.

Key words

Sample - Staining - Tuberculosis


Publication History

Received: 25 September 2017

Accepted: 14 November 2017

Article published online:
19 February 2020

© 2018.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Chandra TJ. Phd Thesis. Saveetha University; 1 December, 2016.
  • 2 Oxlade O, Murray M. Tuberculosis and poverty: Why are the poor at greater risk in India? PLoS One 2012;7:e47533.
  • 3 Chandra TJ. Correlation between serum calcium levels and smear grading among the pulmonary tuberculosis patients. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2018;8:19-22.
  • 4 Sachdeva KS, Kumar A, Dewan P, Kumar A, Satyanarayana S. New vision for Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP): Universal access – “Reaching the un-reached”. Indian J Med Res 2012;135:690-4.
  • 5 Chandra TJ, Selvaraj R, Sharma YV. Comparison of variants of carbol fuchsin & phenol in Ziehl Neelsen staining to detect AFB. J Mycobacteriol Dis 2012;3:131.
  • 6 Chandra TJ. Same day sputum smear microscopy approach for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in a microscopy centre at Rajahmundry. Indian J Tuberc 2012;59:141-4.
  • 7 Bonnet M, Ramsay A, Gagnidze L, Githui W, Guerin PJ, Varaine F, et al. Reducing the number of sputum samples examined and thresholds for positivity: An opportunity to optimise smear microscopy. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2007;11:953-8.
  • 8 Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Manual for Sputum Smear Fluorescence Microscopy. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Available from: http://www.tbcindia.nic.in/showfile.php?lid=2988. [Last accessed on 2015 Dec 26].
  • 9 Squire SB, Belaye AK, Kashoti A, Salaniponi FM, Mundy CJ, Theobald S, et al. 'Lost' smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis cases: Where are they and why did we lose them? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005;9:25-31.
  • 10 Botha E, den Boon S, Lawrence KA, Reuter H, Verver S, Lombard CJ, et al. From suspect to patient: Tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment initiation in health facilities in South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2008;12:936-41.
  • 11 Chandra TJ, Raj RS, Sharma YV. Same day sputum smear microscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: Direct versus concentrated sputum smear. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2015;20:247-51.
  • 12 Chandra TJ, Raj RS, Sharma YV. Same day sputum smear microscopy approach with modified ZN staining for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in a microscopy centre at Rajahmundry. Indian J Med Microbiol 2014;32:153-6.
  • 13 Cuevas LE, Al-Sonboli N, Lawson L, Yassin MA, Arbide I, Al-Aghbari N, et al. LED fluorescence microscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: A multi-country cross-sectional evaluation. PLoS Med 2011;8:e1001057.
  • 14 World Health Organization. Addendum to WHO Guidelines for the Prevention of Tuberculosis in Health Care Facilities in Resource-Limited Settings, 1999. Tuberculosis Infection Control in the Era of Expanding HIV Care and Treatment. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2006.
  • 15 Dharmadhikari AS, Mphahlele M, Stoltz A, Venter K, Mathebula R, Masotla T, et al. Surgical face masks worn by patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: Impact on infectivity of air on a hospital ward. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;185:1104-9.
  • 16 Chandra TJ, Senthil S, Selvaraj R, Sharma YV. Same day sputum smear microscopy: ZN staining versus RZN staining. J Pure Appl Microbiol 2016;10:1599-602.
  • 17 Chandra TJ, Selvaraj R, Sharma YV. Same day sputum smear microscopy with an economical destaining step for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Sci Res 2015;4:244-7.
  • 18 RNTCP Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services. Manual for Laboratory Technicians. New Delhi, India: Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 1998.
  • 19 World Health Organization. The Global Plan to Stop TB, 2011–2015. WHO/HTM/STB/2010.2. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2010.
  • 20 Boum Y 2nd, Atwine D, Orikiriza P, Assimwe J, Page AL, Mwanga-Amumpaire J, et al. Male gender is independently associated with pulmonary tuberculosis among sputum and non-sputum producers people with presumptive tuberculosis in Southwestern Uganda. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:638.
  • 21 Neyrolles O, Quintana-Murci L. Sexual inequality in tuberculosis. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000199.
  • 22 Khan MS, Dar O, Sismanidis C, Shah K, Godfrey-Faussett P. Improvement of tuberculosis case detection and reduction of discrepancies between men and women by simple sputum-submission instructions: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;369:1955-60.
  • 23 Chandra TJ, Rao PA, Srinivas G, Moorthy NV, Rao PV. Role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in smear negative and suspect cases of pulmonary tuberculosis. NTI Bull 2006;42:12-4.
  • 24 Ramsay A, Bonnet M, Gagnidze L, Githui W, Varaine F, Guérin PJ, et al. Sputum, sex and scanty smears: New case definition may reduce sex disparities in smear-positive tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2009;13:613-9.
  • 25 Chandra TJ, Selvaraj R, Allam RR, Sharma YV. Same day sputum smear microscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: Modified ZN staining versus LED FM. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci2015;4:75-81.
  • 26 Chandra TJ, Selvaraj R, Sharma YV. Same day sputum smear microscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: Ziehl-Neelsen versus fluorescent staining. J Family Med Prim Care 2015;4:525-8.
  • 27 Nelson SM, Deike MA, Cartwright CP. Value of examining multiple sputum specimens in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:467-9.
  • 28 Rao KR. Inter and intra-reader variations in direct microscopy and their influence on sensitivity and specificity. Proceedings of the 24th National TB & Chest Disease Workers Conference. Trivandrum, India; 1969. p. 99-110.
  • 29 Chandrasekaran V, Ramachandran R, Cunningham J, Balasubramaniun R, Thomas A. Factors leading to tuberculosis diagnostic dropout and delayed treatment initiation in Chennai, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005; 9: 172.
  • 30 Reza LW, Satyanarayna S, Enarson DA, Kumar AM, Sagili K, Kumar S, et al. LED-fluorescence microscopy for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis under programmatic conditions in India. PLoS One 2013;8:e75566.
  • 31 Bhalla M, Sidiq Z, Sharma PP, Singhal R, Myneedu VP, Sarin R. Performance of light emitting diode fluorescence microscope for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Int J Mycobacteriol 2013;2:174-8.
  • 32 Freiman DG, Pinner M. Routine examination of sputum for acid-fast bacilli. Am Rev Tuberc 1949;59:449-60.
  • 33 Cattamanchi A, Huang L, Worodria W, den Boon S, Kalema N, Katagira W, et al. Integrated strategies to optimize sputum smear microscopy: A prospective observational study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:547-51.
  • 34 WHO. 2007 Annual Report. Available from: http://www.who.int/entity/whr/2007/whr07en.pdf. [Last accessed on 2016 Dec 07].
  • 35 RNTCP 2016. Available from: http://www.tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=2&sublinkid=4573&lid=3177. [Last accessed on 2017 Jun 17].