Reduction in sample rejections at the preanalytical phase – Impact of training in a tertiary care oncology center

Abstract

CONTEXT: Major clinical decisions are based on the laboratory test results where preanalytical errors are an important cause of repeat collections in patients. Identification of problem areas and continuous training of phlebotomy staff are important tools in reducing these errors.

AIMS: In this study, we looked at the most common causes of sample rejection in our setting and the efficacy of the corrective measures and training processes for staff in reducing preanalytical errors.

SETTINGS AND DESIGNS: This prospective study was conducted at the laboratory diagnostic services of a tertiary care oncology center, with a hematopoietic stem cell transplant unit during the period of 2012–2017 in two phases. Sample rejections from various wards were analyzed for types of rejections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the first phase, we analyzed the problem areas (year 2012). Following a root cause analysis, current practices of training were altered. In the second phase (2013–2017), we studied the effects of these measures.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The percent variation and P value for significance in sample rejections were calculated.

RESULTS: During the year 2012, 0.36% samples were rejected by laboratory. Following interventions in the period from 2013 to 2017, samples rejected dropped to 0.19% (P < 0.0001), 0.09% (P < 0.0001), 0.09% (P = 0.8387), 0.05% (P = 0.0004), and 0.05% (P = 0.329), respectively. The reduction was significant from surgical oncology ward (P = 0.0107) and intensive care unit (P = 0.0007). From 2013 to 2017, errors significantly reduced to 0.015% for hemolyzed samples (P = 0.0001), 0.005% for contaminated samples, 0.036% for clotted samples, and 0.019% for labeling errors.

CONCLUSION: Intervention in the form of targeted training helps reduce errors and improves the quality of results generated and contributes to better clinical outcomes.

Key words

Intervention - laboratory errors - quality assurance - root-cause analysis - sample rejection - training efficacy

• References

• 1 Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. The IFCC working group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Clin Chim Acta 2009;404:79-85.
• 2 Wiwanitkit V. Types and frequency of preanalytical mistakes in the first Thai ISO 9002:1994 certified clinical laboratory, a 6 – Month monitoring. BMC Clin Pathol 2001;1:5.
• 3 Sinici Lay I, Pınar A, Akbıyık F. Classification of reasons for rejection of biological specimens based on pre-preanalytical processes to identify quality indicators at a university hospital clinical laboratory in Turkey. Clin Biochem 2014;47:1002-5.
• 4 Goswami B, Singh B, Chawla R, Mallika V. Evaluation of errors in a clinical laboratory: A one-year experience. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:63-6.
• 5 Nigam PK. Preanalytical errors: Some common errors in blood specimen collection for routine investigations in hospital patients. Clin Diagn Res 2011;5:659-61.
• 6 Bhat V, Tiwari M, Chavan P, Kelkar R. Analysis of laboratory sample rejections in the pre-analytical stage at an oncology center. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:1203-6.
• 7 Romero A, Cobos A, Gómez J, Muñoz M. Role of training activities for the reduction of pre-analytical errors in laboratory samples from primary care. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:166-9.
• 8 Forsman RW. Why is the laboratory an afterthought for managed care organizations? Clin Chem 1996;42:813-6.
• 9 Lillo R, Salinas M, Lopez-Garrigos M, Naranjo-Santana Y, Gutiérrez M, Marín MD, et al. Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions. Clin Lab 2012;58:911-7.
• 10 Ashakiran S, Sumati ME, Murthy NK. A study of pre-analytical variables in clinical biochemistry laboratory. Clin Biochem 2011;44:944-5.
• 11 Najat D. Prevalence of pre-analytical errors in clinical chemistry diagnostic labs in Sulaimani city of Iraqi Kurdistan. PLoS One 2017;12:e0170211.
• 12 Valenstein P, Meier F. Outpatient order accuracy. A college of American pathologists Q-probes study of requisition order entry accuracy in 660 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999;123:1145-50.
• 13 Guimarães AC, Wolfart M, Brisolara ML, Dani C. Causes of rejection of blood samples handled in the clinical laboratory of a university hospital in Porto Alegre. Clin Biochem 2012;45:123-6.
• 14 Dale JC, Novis DA. Outpatient phlebotomy success and reasons for specimen rejection. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126:416-9.
• 15 Gungor M, Kural A, Seval H, BercikInal B, Coskun C, Ozturk H, et al. Measurement uncertainty in clinical biochemistry, ABSTRACTS. Clin Biochem 2009;42:324-37.
• 16 Carraro P, Servidio G, Plebani M. Hemolyzed specimens: A reason for rejection or a clinical challenge? Clin Chem 2000;46:306-7.
• 17 Diamantidis A, Chatzoglou P. Employee post-training behaviour and performance: Evaluating the results of the training process. Int J Train Dev 2014;18:149-70.
• 18 Cheng EW, Hampson I. Transfer of training: A review and new insights. Int J Manage Rev 2008;10:327-41.
• 19 Velada R, Caetano A, Michel JW, Lyons BD, Kavanagh MJ. The effects of training design, individual characteristics and work environment on transfer of training. Int J Train Dev 2007;11:282-94.
• 20 Yang H, Sanders K, Bumatay CP. Linking perception of training with organizational commitment: The moderating role of self-construals. Eur J Work Org Psychol 2012;21:125-49.
• 21 Burke A, Saks M. Accountability in training transfer: Adapting Schlenker's model of responsibility to a persistent but solvable problem. Hum Resour Dev Rev 2009;8:382-402.