CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2018; 10(01): 080-084
DOI: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_71_17
Original Article

Evaluation of new indigenous “point‑of‑care” ABO and Rh grouping device

Aseem Kumar Tiwari
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Divya Setya
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Geet Aggarwal
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Dinesh Arora
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Ravi C. Dara
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Manipal Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
,
Ankita Ratan
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Gunjan Bhardwaj
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Devi Prasad Acharya
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil
Zoom Image

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Erycard 2.0 is a “point-of-care” device that is primarily being used for patient blood grouping before transfusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Erycard 2.0 was compared with conventional slide technology for accuracy and time taken for ABO and Rh forward grouping result with column agglutination technology (CAT) being the gold standard. Erycard 2.0 as a device was also evaluated for its stability under different storage conditions and stability of result till 48 h. In addition, grouping of hemolyzed samples was also tested with Erycard 2.0. Ease of use of Erycard 2.0 was evaluated with a survey among paramedical staff.

RESULTS: Erycard 2.0 demonstrated 100% concordance with CAT as compared with slide technique (98.9%). Mean time taken per test by Erycard 2.0 and slide technique was 5.13 min and 1.7 min, respectively. After pretesting storage under different temperature and humidity conditions, Erycard 2.0 did not show any deviation from the result. The result did not change even after 48 h of testing and storage under room temperature. 100% concordance was recorded between pre- and post-hemolyzed blood grouping. Ease of use survey revealed that Erycard 2.0 was more acceptable to paramedical staff for its simplicity, objectivity, and performance than conventional slide technique.

CONCLUSION: Erycard 2.0 can be used as “point-of-care” device for blood donor screening for ABO and Rh blood group and can possibly replace conventional slide technique.



Publication History

Received: 12 April 2017

Accepted: 21 July 2017

Article published online:
19 February 2020

© 2018.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

Crossref Cited-by logo
Article Citations