PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2019; 11(01): 017-022
DOI: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_98_18
Original Article

Detection of biofilm among uropathogenic Escherichia coli and its correlation with antibiotic resistance pattern

Rashmi M. Karigoudar
Department of Microbiology, BLDE (Deemed to be University) Shri B M Patil Medical College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India
,
Mahesh H. Karigoudar
Department of Pathology, BLDE (Deemed to be University) Shri B M Patil Medical College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India
,
Sanjay M. Wavare
Department of Microbiology, BLDE (Deemed to be University) Shri B M Patil Medical College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India
,
Smita S. Mangalgi
Department of Microbiology, BLDE (Deemed to be University) Shri B M Patil Medical College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India
› Institutsangaben Financial support and sponsorship: Nil
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
  als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli accounts for 70%–95% of urinary tract infections (UTIs). UTI is a serious health problem with respect to antibiotic resistance and biofilms formation being the prime cause for the antibiotic resistance. Biofilm can restrict the diffusion of substances and binding of antimicrobials. In this context, the present study is aimed to perform in vitro detection of biofilm formation among E. coli strains isolated from urine and to correlate their susceptibility pattern with biofilm formation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 E. coli strains isolated from patients suffering from UTI were included in the study. The identification of E. coli was performed by colony morphology, Gram staining, and standard biochemical tests. The detection of biofilm was carried out by Congo Red Agar (CRA) method, tube method (TM), and tissue culture plate (TCP) method. Antimicrobial sensitivity testing was performed by Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method on Muller–Hinton agar plate.

RESULTS: Of the 100 E. coli strains, 49 (49%) and 51 (51%) were from catheterized and noncatheterized patients, respectively. Biofilm production was positive by CRA, TM, and TCP method were 49 (49%), 55 (55%), and 69 (69%), respectively. Biofilm producers showed maximum resistance to co-trimoxazole (73.9%), gentamicin (94.2%), and imipenem (11.6%) when compared to nonbiofilm producers. Significant association was seen between resistance to antibiotic and biofilm formation with a P = 0.01 (<0.05).

CONCLUSION: A greater understanding of biofilm detection in E. coli will help in the development of newer and more effective treatment. The detection of biofilm formation and antibiotic susceptibility pattern helps in choosing the correct antibiotic therapy.

Key words

Antibiotic resistance - biofilm - Escherichia coli


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 24. Juli 2018

Angenommen: 17. Dezember 2018

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. April 2020

© 2019.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004;2:123-40.
  • 2 Warren JW, Tenney JH, Hoopes JM, Muncie HL, Anthony WC. A prospective microbiologic study of bacteriuria in patients with chronic indwelling urethral catheters. J Infect Dis 1982;146:719-23.
  • 3 Stamm WE. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention. Am J Med 1991;91:65S-71S.
  • 4 Sevanan M, Pongiya U, Peedikavil NJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of biofilm producing Escherichia coli of urinary tract infections. Curr Res Bacteriol 2011;4:73-80.
  • 5 Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002;15:167-93.
  • 6 Saroj G, Vivek H, Sujata KK, Reddy M. Correlation between biofilm formation of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and its antibiotic resistance pattern. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2012;1:166-75.
  • 7 Sharma M, Aparna, Yadav S, Chaudhary U. Biofilm production in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2009;52:294.
  • 8 Soto SM, Smithson A, Horcajada JP, Martinez JA, Mensa JP, Vila J, et al. Implication of biofilm formation in the persistence of urinary tract infection caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12:1034-6.
  • 9 González MJ, Robino L, Iribarnegaray V, Zunino P, Scavone P. Effect of different antibiotics on biofilm produced by uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from children with urinary tract infection. Pathog Dis 2017;75:1-9.
  • 10 Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 2001;358:135-8.
  • 11 Panda PS, Chaudhary U, Dube SK. Comparison of four different methods for detection of biofilm formation by uropathogens. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2016;59:177-9.
  • 12 Rashmi MK, Mahantesh BN. Characterization and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of coagulase negative staphylococci with special reference to methicillin resistance. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2016;5:114-20.
  • 13 Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, Baddour LM, Barrett FF, Melton DM, et al. Adherance of coagulase negative staphylococci to plastic tissue cultures; a qualitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 1985;22:996-1006.
  • 14 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antmicrobial Susceptiblity Testing; Twenty-fourth Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M100-S24. Vol. 33. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014.
  • 15 Ponnusamy P, Natarajan V, Sevanan M. In vitro biofilm formation by uropathogenic Escherichia coli and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2012;5:210-3.
  • 16 Suman E, Jose J, Varghese S, Kotian MS. Study of biofilm production in Escherichia coli causing urinary tract infection. Indian J Med Microbiol 2007;25:305-6.
  • 17 Mittal S, Sharma M, Chaudhary U. Biofilm and multidrug resistance in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Pathog Glob Health 2015;109:26-9.