CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2018; 13(02): 297-301
DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_151_16
Original Article

Adjuvant radiation therapy and temozolomide in gliosarcoma: Is it enough? case series of seven patients

Himanshu Srivastava
Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi
,
Abhinav Dewan
Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi
,
Surender Sharma
Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi
,
Preety Negi
1   Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab
,
Ajay Dewan
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi
,
Sunil Pasricha
3   Department of Pathology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi
,
Krati Mehrotra
4   Department of Critical Care, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi
› Author Affiliations

Objective: We present our experience of gliosarcoma (GSM) in oncology tertiary care center over the last 5 years. Materials and Methods: We carried out a retrospective analysis of seven patients with GSM diagnosed between April 2008 and December 2012. Demographic data, clinicopathological data, treatment strategies employed, details of recurrence, and survival patterns were reviewed. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 54 years, ranging between 34 and 63 years with a female predominance (57.1% females). Headache and neurological deficit were the most common symptoms with parietal region being the most common site of lesion. Subtotal resection followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy was delivered to six patients. The results following completion of planned schedule of concurrent chemoradiotherapy were quite disappointing with two patients having no evidence of disease, one patient was lost to follow-up, and other three had progressive disease. One patient with progressive disease subsequently received eight cycles of bevacizumab on a clinical trial protocol. Fifteen-month posttreatment, she had stable disease on follow-up. Conclusions: Our experience suggests that despite treatment, the diagnosis of GSM portends a poor prognosis and the use of bevacizumab could represent a treatment approach to improve outcome in these patients. Although the role of targeted therapy in GSM remains unclear because of paucity of experience, the treatment decision should be according to patient's performance status, ability, and willingness to receive additional treatment.



Publication History

Article published online:
14 September 2022

© 2018. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India