PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2019; 14(02): 440-452
DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_252_18
Original Article

Solving the riddle of “Idiopathic” in idiopathic intracranial hypertension and normal pressure hydrocephalus: An imaging study of the possible mechanisms – Monro–Kellie 3.0

Sandhya Mangalore
1   Department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, NIMHANS
2   Department of Neuroradiology, MSR INS, Bengaluru, Karnataka
,
Srinivasa Rakshith
3   Department of Neurosurgery, MSR INS, Bengaluru, Karnataka
,
Rangashetty Srinivasa
4   Department of Neurology, MSR INS, Bengaluru, Karnataka
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Background: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) represent a cluster of typical clinical and imaging findings, with no evident etiological cause noted. In this study, we have proposed a model for IIH and NPH called Monroe–Kellie 3.0 (MK 3.0). IIH and NPH may be entities which represent opposite sides of the same coin with venous system and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as core drivers for both these entities. Materials and Methods: IIH and NPH volume data were collected, voxel-based morphometry analysis was performed without normalization, and the distribution of the individual volumes of gray matter, white matter, and CSF was statistically analyzed. Visual morphometry analyses of segmented data were performed, and the findings in routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were noted to build a model for IIH and NPH. Results: In IIH and NPH when the volumes were compared with controls, the distribution was similar. Furthermore, the morphometric changes noted in the MRI and segmented volume data were analyzed and the results were suggestive of changes in elastic property of brain causing a remodeling of brain shape and resulting in minor brain shift in the skull vault, and the resulting passive displacement of CSF which has been termed as MK 3.0. Conclusion: This model helps to put the clinical and imaging findings and complications of treatment in single perspective.

Key-words:

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension - Monro–Kellie - normal pressure hydrocephalus

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.




Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. September 2022

© 2019. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Suzuki H, Takanashi J, Kobayashi K, Nagasawa K, Tashima K, Kohno Y. MR imaging of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:196-9.
  • 2 Damasceno BP. Neuroimaging in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Neuropsychol 2015;9:350-5.
  • 3 Goodwin CR, Elder BD, Ward A, Orkoulas-Razis D, Kosztowski TA, Hoffberger J, et al. Risk factors for failed transverse sinus stenting in pseudotumor cerebri patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;127:75-8.
  • 4 Gölz L, Ruppert FH, Meier U, Lemcke J. Outcome of modern shunt therapy in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus 6 years postoperatively. J Neurosurg 2014;121:771-5.
  • 5 Markey KA, Mollan SP, Jensen RH, Sinclair AJ. Understanding idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Mechanisms, management, and future directions. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:78-91.
  • 6 Wilson MH. Monro-Kellie 2.0: The dynamic vascular and venous pathophysiological components of intracranial pressure. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016;36:1338-50.
  • 7 Kim H, Min BK, Park DH, Hawi S, Kim BJ, Czosnyka Z, et al. Porohyperelastic anatomical models for hydrocephalus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg 2015;122:1330-40.
  • 8 Ringstad G, Vatnehol SA, Eide PK. Glymphatic MRI in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 2017;140:2691-705.
  • 9 Cherian I, Beltran M, Kasper EM, Bhattarai B, Munokami S, Grasso G, et al. Exploring the Virchow-Robin spaces function: A unified theory of brain diseases. Surg Neurol Int 2016;7:S711-4.
  • 10 Engelhardt B, Carare RO, Bechmann I, Flügel A, Laman JD, Weller RO, et al. Vascular, glial, and lymphatic immune gateways of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 2016;132:317-38.
  • 11 Orešković D, Klarica M. A new look at cerebrospinal fluid movement. Fluids Barriers CNS 2014;11:16.
  • 12 Bezerra ML, Ferreira AC, de Oliveira-Souza R. Pseudotumor cerebri and glymphatic dysfunction. Front Neurol 2017;8:734.
  • 13 Ramesh VG, Narasimhan V, Balasubramanian C. Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics study in communicating hydrocephalus. Asian J Neurosurg 2017;12:153-8.
  • 14 Gideon P, Sørensen PS, Thomsen C, Ståhlberg F, Gjerris F, Henriksen O, et al. Increased brain water self-diffusion in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:381-7.
  • 15 Akay R, Kamisli O, Kahraman A, Oner S, Tecellioglu M. Evaluation of aqueductal CSF flow dynamics with phase contrast cine MR imaging in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients: Preliminary results. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015;19:3475-9.
  • 16 Tawfik AM, Elsorogy L, Abdelghaffar R, Naby AA, Elmenshawi I. Phase-contrast MRI CSF flow measurements for the diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus: Observer agreement of velocity versus volume parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;208:838-43.
  • 17 Zhong X, Meyer CH, Schlesinger DJ, Sheehan JP, Epstein FH, Larner JM, et al. Tracking brain motion during the cardiac cycle using spiral cine-DENSE MRI. Med Phys 2009;36:3413-9.
  • 18 Saindane AM, Qiu D, Oshinski JN, Newman NJ, Biousse V, Bruce BB, et al. Noninvasive assessment of intracranial pressure status in idiopathic intracranial hypertension using displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) MRI: A prospective patient study with contemporaneous CSF pressure correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:311-6.
  • 19 Graff-Radford NR. Alzheimer CSF biomarkers may be misleading in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology 2014;83:1573-5.
  • 20 Radford RA, Morsch M, Rayner SL, Cole NJ, Pountney DL, Chung RS, et al. The established and emerging roles of astrocytes and microglia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Front Cell Neurosci 2015;9:414.
  • 21 Kolipaka A, Wassenaar PA, Cha S, Marashdeh WM, Mo X, Kalra P, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography to estimate brain stiffness: Measurement reproducibility and its estimate in pseudotumor cerebri patients. Clin Imaging 2018;51:114-22.
  • 22 Fattahi N, Arani A, Perry A, Meyer F, Manduca A, Glaser K, et al. MR elastography demonstrates increased brain stiffness in normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:462-7.
  • 23 Arani A, Min HK, Fattahi N, Wetjen NM, Trzasko JD, Manduca A, et al. Acute pressure changes in the brain are correlated with MR elastography stiffness measurements: Initial feasibility in an in vivo large animal model. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:1043-51.
  • 24 Balédent O. Imaging of the Cerebrospinal Fluid Circulation Adult Hydrocephalus. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 121-38.
  • 25 Valdueza JM, Hoffmann O, Weih M, Mehraein S, Einhäupl KM. Monitoring of venous hemodynamics in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis by transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Arch Neurol 1999;56:229-34.
  • 26 Gourdeau A, Miller NR. Neuro Ophthalmological Signs of Hydrocephalus, Neurobiology of Cerebrospinal Fluid 2. New York: Plenum Press; 1983.
  • 27 Ertl M, Aigner R, Krost M, Karnasová Z, Müller K, Naumann M, et al. Measuring changes in the optic nerve sheath diameter in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: A useful diagnostic supplement to spinal tap tests. Eur J Neurol 2017;24:461-7.
  • 28 Alperin N, Ranganathan S, Bagci AM, Adams DJ, Ertl-Wagner B, Saraf-Lavi E, et al. MRI evidence of impaired CSF homeostasis in obesity-associated idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:29-34.
  • 29 Bateman GA. Vascular hydraulics associated with idiopathic and secondary intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1180-6.
  • 30 Bateman GA. Arterial inflow and venous outflow in idiopathic intracranial hypertension associated with venous outflow stenoses. J Clin Neurosci 2008;15:402-8.
  • 31 Ray BS, Wolff HG. Experimental studies on headache pain-sensitive structures of the head and their significance in headache. Arch Surg 1940;41:813-56.
  • 32 Walker RW. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: Any light on the mechanism of the raised pressure? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71:1-5.
  • 33 Satow T, Aso T, Nishida S, Komuro T, Ueno T, Oishi N, et al. Alteration of venous drainage route in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and normal aging. Front Aging Neurosci 2017;9:387.
  • 34 Kamble JH, Parameswaran K. “Venous congestion” as a cause of subcortical white matter T2 hypointensity on magnetic resonance images. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2016;19:411-3.
  • 35 Hakim S, Venegas JG, Burton JD. The physics of the cranial cavity, hydrocephalus and normal pressure hydrocephalus: Mechanical interpretation and mathematical model. Surg Neurol 1976;5:187-210.
  • 36 Bateman GA. The pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Cerebral ischemia or altered venous hemodynamics? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:198-203.
  • 37 Brooks DJ, Beaney RP, Leenders KL, Marshall J, Thomas DJ, Jones T, et al. Regional cerebral oxygen utilization, blood flow, and blood volume in benign intracranial hypertension studied by positron emission tomography. Neurology 1985;35:1030-4.
  • 38 Jagust WJ, Friedland RP, Budinger TF. Positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose differentiates normal pressure hydrocephalus from Alzheimer-type dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985;48:1091-6.
  • 39 Zur D, Naftaliev E, Kesler A. Evidence of multidomain mild cognitive impairment in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol 2015;35:26-30.
  • 40 Knight MJ, McCann B, Tsivos D, Dillon S, Coulthard E, Kauppinen RA, et al. Quantitative T2 mapping of white matter: Applications for ageing and cognitive decline. Phys Med Biol 2016;61:5587-605.
  • 41 Schwartz RB, Jones KM, Kalina P, Bajakian RL, Mantello MT, Garada B, et al. Hypertensive encephalopathy: Findings on CT, MR imaging, and SPECT imaging in 14 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:379-83.
  • 42 Kranz PG, Tanpitukpongse TP, Choudhury KR, Amrhein TJ, Gray L. Imaging signs in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: Prevalence and relationship to CSF pressure. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1374-8.
  • 43 Shah LM, McLean LA, Heilbrun ME, Salzman KL. Intracranial hypotension: Improved MRI detection with diagnostic intracranial angles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:400-7.
  • 44 Narita W, Nishio Y, Baba T, Iizuka O, Ishihara T, Matsuda M, et al. High-convexity tightness predicts the shunt response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1831-7.
  • 45 Hong YJ, Kim MJ, Jeong E, Kim JE, Hwang J, Lee JI, et al. Preoperative biomarkers in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus showing a favorable shunt surgery outcome. J Neurol Sci 2018;387:21-6.
  • 46 Starr BW, Hagen MC, Espay AJ. Hydrocephalic parkinsonism: Lessons from normal pressure hydrocephalus mimics. J Clin Mov Disord 2014;1:2.