CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2019; 14(02): 483-486
DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_275_18
Original Article

Bespoke gelfoam wafers: A practical and inexpensive alternative to oxycel for hemostasis during neurosurgery

Santosh Prabhu
Department of Neurosurgery, Western India Institute of Neurosciences, Kolhapur, Maharashtra
,
Sujata Prabhu
1   Department of Neuroanesthesia, Western India Institute of Neurosciences, Kolhapur, Maharashtra
› Author Affiliations

Background: Since the beginning of neurosurgery, intraoperative parenchymal bleeding has been a major problem. Achievement of hemostasis is the endpoint of any cranial or spinal neurosurgical exercise and is mandatory to avoid postoperative hematomas which mar the ultimate outcome of the surgery. Several biosurgical agents are used to achieve this goal. Agents such as oxidized cellulose, gelatin foam, fibrillar collagen, fibrin sealants, and antifibrinolytic agents are used, each having a different mechanism of action. Materials and Methods: The authors describe a simple technique for substituting oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel) for lining the surgical cavities after excising brain lesions, with customized gelfoam wafers fashioned on the surgical trolley. This has been used in over 8000 cases with excellent hemostatic results over the last 25 years. No complications are noted with use of these wafers. Results: In a randomized trial done by us, similar hemostatic effect was found between oxycel and the gelfoam wafers described by us with satisfactory outcomes of surgeries. No previous use of such custom-fashioned wafers has been described for neurosurgical hemostasis in the literature.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.




Publication History

Article published online:
09 September 2022

© 2019. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Kruger J. Hemostasis in neurosurgical operations. A comparative study between collagen fleece and gelatin sponge. Zentralbl Neurochir 1992;53:33-6.
  • 2 Wagner WR, Pachence JM, Ristich J, Johnson PC. Comparative in vitro analysis of topical hemostatic agents. J Surg Res 1996;66:100-8.
  • 3 Matula C, Steiger C. Hemostasis and Fleece bound sealing in Neurosurgery. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2005. p. 1
  • 4 Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Callovini G, Alfieri A. Biosurgical hemostatic agents in neurosurgical intracranial procedures. Surg Technol Int 2017;30:468-76.
  • 5 Light RU. Hemostasis in neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 1945;2:414-34. [doi: 10.3171/jns. 1945.2.5.0414].
  • 6 Light RU, Prentice HR. Surgical investigation of a new absorbable sponge derived from gelatin for use in hemostasis. J Neurosurg 1945;2:435-55.
  • 7 Schonauer C, Tessitore E, Barbagallo G, Albanese V, Moraci A. The use of local agents: Bone wax, gelatin, collagen, oxidized cellulose. Eur Spine J 2004;13 Suppl 1:S89-96.
  • 8 Goodman LS, Gilman A. Surface-Acting Drugs, in the Pharmacologic Basis of Therapeutics. 6th ed. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.;1980. p. 955.
  • 9 Guralnick W, Berg L. GELFOAM in oral surgery. Clinical and experimental observations on the use of gelatin sponge or foam. Oral Surg 1948;1:629-32.
  • 10 Jenkins HP, Janda R, Clarke J. Clinical and experimental observations on the use of gelatin sponge or foam. Surgery 1946;20:124-32.
  • 11 Barnes AC. The use of gelatin foam sponges in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1947;54:105-7.
  • 12 Ereth MH, Schaff M, Ericson EF, Wetjen NM, Nuttall GA, Oliver WC Jr., et al. Comparative safety and efficacy of topical hemostatic agents in a rat neurosurgical model. Neurosurgery 2008;63:369-72.