Follow-up bibliometric analysis of neurosurgical publications from Pakistan and institutional comparison with other countries using h-index and i-10 index

Aim: The aim of the study was to analyze the neurosurgical research output of Pakistan and compare it with that of developed countries. Methodology: We conducted a bibliometric analysis of publically available databases for all neurosurgical publications from Pakistan. All indexed peer-reviewed publications from January 2009 to December 2014 where at least one author was affiliated with any neurosurgical departments in Pakistan and research was conducted in Pakistan were selected. Manual and electronic search was done using MeSH terms to search for articles from Pakistan. Articles were then categorized according to design, subspecialty, region, and year. Results: Our search identified 121 articles during the defined study period (mean = 20.16 ± 5.2 papers/year). A relatively constant increase was noticed for the last 6 years, i.e., 2009–2014. From the total 121 references, 100 (82.4%) publications were from one city, and on subanalysis, 80 (66.1%) were from a single institution. Three primary authors cumulatively contributed to 76 (62.8%) of these publications. Almost two-thirds (n = 76, 62.8%) of these publications were published in either regional or international journals while only 37.2% (n = 45) were published in local nonneurosurgery-specific journals. Only one study in the 6-year study period was with Level I evidence (meta-analysis). Conclusion: Neurosurgery research in Pakistan has shown modest improvement in terms of quality and quantity. Collaboration between various centers and channelizing different resources to create national data registries along with basic science laboratories is much needed.

Key-words:

Bibliometric analysis - neurosurgery research - Pakistan

• References

• 1 World Health Organization. Research and Development to Meet Health Needs in Developing Countries: Strengthening Global Financing and Coordination. Report of the Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Development: Financing and Coordination. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
• 2 Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2095-128.
• 3 Røttingen JA, Regmi S, Eide M, Young AJ, Viergever RF, Ardal C, et al. Mapping of available health research and development data: What's there, what's missing, and what role is there for a global observatory? Lancet 2013;382:1286-307.
• 4 Leach-Kemon K, Chou DP, Schneider MT, Tardif A, Dieleman JL, Brooks BP, et al. The global financial crisis has led to a slowdown in growth of funding to improve health in many developing countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31:228-35.
• 5 Shamim MS, Enam SA, Kazim SF. Neurosurgical research in pakistan: Trends of publication and quality of evidence. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011;113:107-10.
• 6 Hauptman JS, Chow DS, Martin NA, Itagaki MW. Research productivity in neurosurgery: Trends in globalization, scientific focus, and funding. J Neurosurg 2011;115:1262-72.
• 7 Madhugiri VS. Publication performance and research output of neurology and neurosurgery training institutes in India: A 5-year analysis. Neurol India 2015;63:338-46.
• 8 Jamjoom AB. Survey of h-index for neurosurgeons in Saudi Arabia. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2015;20:392-5.
• 9 Knight J. Academic impact rankings of neurosurgical units in the U.K. And Ireland, as assessed with the h-index. Br J Neurosurg 2015;29:637-43.
• 10 Burnett MG, Stein SC, Grady MS. What we research: Survey of american association of neurological surgeons and congress of neurological surgeons member publications. J Neurosurg 2004;100:73-8.
• 11 Ponce FA, Lozano AM. Academic impact and rankings of American and Canadian neurosurgical departments as assessed using the h index. J Neurosurg 2010;113:447-57.
• 12 Population Welfare Department (Punjab); 2015. Available from: http://www.pwd.punjab.gov.pk/. [Last accessed on 2015 May 19].
• 13 El Khamlichi A. African neurosurgery: Current situation, priorities, and needs. Neurosurgery 2001;48:1344-7.
• 14 Shamim MS, Tahir MZ, Godil SS, Kumar R, Siddiqui AA. A critical analysis of the current state of neurosurgery training in Pakistan. Surg Neurol Int 2011;2:183.
• 15 Shamim MS, Shamim MS. Research and publications: Where do we stand? J Pak Med Assoc 2009;59:62-4.
• 16 Zafar SN, Khan AA, Ghauri AA, Shamim MS. Phenytoin versus leviteracetam for seizure prophylaxis after brain injury – A meta analysis. BMC Neurol 2012;12:30.
• 17 Shamim MS, Enam SA, Tahir MZ, Khan M. Prospective case control evaluation of epidural midazolam for improving pain and ambulation after microdiscectomy. J Pak Med Assoc 2012;62:561-5.
• 18 King DA. The scientific impact of nations. Nature 2004;430:311-6.
• 19 Rahman M, Fukui T. Biomedical publication – Global profile and trend. Public Health 2003;117:274-80.
• 20 Salager-Meyer F. Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. J Engl Acad Purposes 2008;7:121-32.
• 21 Spearman CM, Quigley MJ, Quigley MR, Wilberger JE. Survey of the h index for all of academic neurosurgery: Another power-law phenomenon? J Neurosurg 2010;113:929-33.
• 22 Aoun SG, Bendok BR, Rahme RJ, Dacey RG Jr. Batjer HH. Standardizing the evaluation of scientific and academic performance in neurosurgery – Critical review of the “h” index and its variants. World Neurosurg 2013;80:e85-90.