Functional outcomes of 300 carpal tunnel release: 1.5 cm longitudinal mini-incision

Keykhosro Mardanpour; Mahtab Rahbar; Sourena Mardanpour

doi:10.4103/ajns.AJNS_31_17

Asian Journal of Neurosurgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2019; 14(03): 693-697
DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_31_17

Original Research Article

Functional outcomes of 300 carpal tunnel release: 1.5 cm longitudinal mini-incision

Keykhosro Mardanpour

Department of Orthopedic, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah

,

Mahtab Rahbar

¹Department of Pathologic, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran

,

Sourena Mardanpour

²Research Center, Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Objective: There is an opportunity for median nerve decompression by open surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome which is the most common surgical procedure in neurosurgical practice. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of carpal tunnel release with 1.5 cm longitudinal mini-incision technique with regarding the effectiveness and safety. Methods: For this prospective study, 300 hands for 188 patients with advanced carpal tunnel syndrome who had indication for neurolysis underwent carpal tunnel release through a 1.5 cm longitudinal mini-incision between March 2011 and 2015. There were 132 (70%) females and 56 (30%) males with a mean age of 40 ± 29.5 years (ranging from 24 to 73) and female to male: About 2.56.178 operations were performed for the right hand and 122 for the left hand. Preoperatively, all patients were evaluated with clinical examination and nerve conduction studies. The clinical effects of the patients assessed with the Global Symptom Score (GSS) and Visual Analog Patient Satisfaction Scale. Results: The mean follow-up period was 18.6 ± 9.3 months (12–30 months). Postoperatively, 2% (six hands) complained of residual mild pain with tenderness of scar and only 1% (three hands) complained of median nerve damage (neuropraxy) with tingling and numbness but was temporary which improved after 1 week. Five patients (seven hands) loosed strength of their wrists, but muscle force of abductor pollicis brevis reinforced after 1 month. There is no evidence of local infection, stiffness, loss of some wrist strength, or recurrence of the disorder. Postoperative GSS scoring obviously improved than preoperative (P < 0.002). There is no patient who underwent reoperation. The mean time recovery appeared almost 2 weeks. Conclusion: 1.5 cm longitudinal mini-incision method in carpal tunnel syndrome decompression showed satisfactory pain relief, wound healing, and nontender scar with good functional outcomes. The technique was performed safely without major complication.

Key-words:

Carpal tunnel syndrome - mini-incision - outcome

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Yamaguchi DM, Lipscomb PR, Soule EH. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Minn Med 1965;48:22-33.
2 Lozano-Calderón S, Anthony S, Ring D. The quality and strength of evidence for etiology: Example of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2008;33:525-38.
3 Scangas G, Lozano-Calderón S, Ring D. Disparity between popular (Internet) and scientific illness concepts of carpal tunnel syndrome causation. J Hand Surg Am 2008;33:1076-80.
4 Chung KC. Current status of outcomes research in carpal tunnel surgery. Hand (N Y) 2006;1:9-13.
5 Jugovac I, Burgic N, Micovic V, Radolovic-Prenc L, Uravic M, Golubovic V, et al. Carpal tunnel release by limited palmar incision vs. traditional open technique: Randomized controlled trial. Croat Med J 2002;43:33-6.
6 Okutsu I, Ninomiya S, Hamanaka I, Kuroshima N, Inanami H. Measurement of pressure in the carpal canal before and after endoscopic management of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:679-83.
7 Richman JA, Gelberman RH, Rydevik BL, Hajek PC, Braun RM, Gylys-Morin VM, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: Morphologic changes after release of the transverse carpal ligament. J Hand Surg Am 1989;14:852-7.
8 Nathan PA. Carpal tunnel release using minimally invasive technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1195-6.
9 Kilincer C, Zileli M. Visual analog patient satisfaction scale. Balkan Med J 2006;23:113-8.
10 Uygur F, Sever C, Yüksel F. Comparing the results of limited incision technique and standard longitudinal incision technique for carpal tunnel decompression by numerical grading system. Turk Neurosurg 2009;19:51-7.
11 Botte MJ. Controversies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Instr Course Lect 2008;57:199-212.
12 Abdullah AF, Wolber PH, Ditto EW rd. Sequelae of carpal tunnel surgery: Rationale for the design of a surgical approach. Neurosurgery 1995;37:931-5.
13 Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999;282:153-8.
14 Aroori S, Spence RA. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Ulster Med J 2008;77:6-17.
15 Aydin K, Cokluk C, Piskin A, Kocabiçak E. Ultrasonographically checking the sectioning of the transverse carpal ligament during carpal tunnel surgery with limited uni skin incisions. Turk Neurosurg 2007;17:219-23.
16 Isik HS, Bostanci U. Experience of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome that operated using a limited uni skin incision. Turk Neurosurg 2011;21:177-80.
17 Huang JH, Zager EL. Mini-open carpal tunnel decompression. Neurosurgery 2004;54:397-9.
18 Louie D, Earp B, Blazar P. Long-term outcomes of carpal tunnel release: A critical review of the literature. Hand (N Y) 2012;7:242-6.
19 Sud V, Tucci MA, Freeland AE, Smith WT, Grinspun K. Absorptive properties of synovium harvested from the carpal tunnel. Microsurgery 2002;22:316-9.
20 Rojviroj S, Sirichativapee W, Kowsuwon W, Wongwiwattananon J, Tamnanthong N, Jeeravipoolvarn P. Pressures in the carpal tunnel. A comparison between patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and normal subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:516-8.
21 Vasiliadis HS, Tokis AV, Andrikoula SI, Kordalis NV, Beris AE, Xenakis T, et al. Microsurgical dissection of the carpal tunnel with respect to neurovascular structures at risk during endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Arthroscopy 2006;22:807-12.
22 Standring S. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 39th ed. New York: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 913.
23 Isogai S, Murakami G, Wada T, Akita K, Yamashita T, Ishii S. Laminar configuration of the transverse carpal ligament. J Orthop Sci 2002;7:79-83.
24 Prantil RK, Xiu K, Kim KE, Gaitan DM, Sacks MS, Woo SL, et al. Fiber orientation of the transverse carpal ligament. Clin Anat 2012;25:478-82.
25 Rodner CM, Katarincic J. Open carpal tunnel release. Tech Orthop 2006;21:3-11.
26 Cellocco P, Rossi C, Bizzarri F, Patrizio L, Costanzo G. Mini-open blind procedure versus limited open technique for carpal tunnel release: A 30-month follow-up study. J Hand Surg Am 2005;30:493-9.
27 Avci S, Sayli U. Carpal tunnel release using a short palmar incision and a new knife. J Hand Surg Br 2000;25:357-60.
28 Teh KK, Ng ES, Choon DS. Mini open carpal tunnel release using Knifelight: Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of using a single wrist incision (cadaveric study). J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009;34:506-10.
29 Wongsiri S, Suwanno P, Tangtrakulwanich B, Yuenyongviwat V, Wongsiri E. A new tool for mini-open carpal tunnel release – The PSU retractor. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:126.
30 Corlobé P. Electrodiagnosis of the entrapment syndroms. Chir Main 2004;23:S165-77.
31 Bal E, Piskin A, Ada S, Ademoglu Y, Toros T, Kayalar M. Comparison between two mini incision techniques utilized in carpal tunnel release. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008;42:234-7.
32 Hamawandi S. Minimal invasive surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome using. Med J Babylon 2014;11:567-73.
33 Nazzi V, Franzini A, Messina G, Broggi G. Carpal tunnel syndrome: Matching minimally invasive surgical techniques. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2008;108:1033-6.
34 Tzaan WC, Lui TN, Lee ST. Midpalmar accurate incision for carpal tunnel release. Chang Gung Med J 2005;28:97-103.
35 Korkmaz M, Ekici MA, Cepoglu MC, Oztürk H. Mini transverse versus longitudinal incision in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2013;23:645-8.