PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2021; 16(01): 89-95
DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_357_20
Original Article

Petroclival meningioma: Management strategy and results in 21st century

Vivek Kankane
Department of Neurosurgery, G.R. Medical College, JAH Groups of Hospital, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh
,
Basant Misra
1   Department Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, P.D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Background: Petroclival meningioma (PCM) is considered among the most difficult tumors to be treated by microneurosurgery because of its location and its relation to critical structures. The authors report on the outcome in a series of patients with PCM treated in the new millennium with a tailored approach of gross total excision or subtotal removal and adjuvant Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKR) depending on the particular case. Methods: Between 2001 and 2017, 72 consecutive PCMs were operated in a single center by the senior surgeon. Clinical presentation, operative approaches, intraoperative findings, complications, and imaging findings were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative outcome, adjuvant Gamma knife, and follow-up findings were reviewed. Results: The average age was 47.95 years, and female-to-male ratio was 52:20. Cavernous sinus extension was present in 21 patients. The mean duration of follow-up was 66.65 months. Gross-total resection, near-total resection (NTR), and subtotal resection (STR) resection was achieved in 30, 24, and 18 (42.8%, 34.28%, and 25%) patients, respectively, with recurrences of 10%, 33%, and 50%, respectively. Twenty-two patients (18 STR and 4 NTR) had received postoperative GKR. Only four patients had recurrences following GKR. New cranial nerve deficits were more common in patients in whom a total resection was performed. There was no mortality. Conclusions: Gross total excision had the best recurrence free rate though with a higher morbidity. Upfront GKR is advisable in patients with residual tumor, if the preoperative temporal course had a rapid symptomatology, to reduce recurrence. Wait and watch for a small intracavernous residue and radiosurgery on growth is also a valid option as long as follow-up is not suspect. A flexible approach of individualizing the treatment protocol for a given patient goes a long way toward optimal outcome.

Key-words:

Current management - gamma knife radiosurgery - meningioma - petroclival

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 20. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 28. Dezember 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. August 2022

© 2021. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Al-Mefty O, Fox JL, Smith RR. Petrosal approach for petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1988;22:510-7.
  • 2 Bambakidis NC, Kakarla UK, Kim LJ, Nakaji P, Porter RW, Daspit CP, et al. Evolution of surgical approaches in the treatment of petroclival meningiomas: A retrospective review. Neurosurgery 2007;61(5 Suppl 2):202-11.
  • 3 Bricolo AP, Turazzi S, Talacchi A, Cristofori L: Microsurgical removal of petroclival meningiomas: A report of 33 patients. Neurosurgery 1992;31:813-28.
  • 4 Couldwell WT, Fukushima T, Giannotta SL, Weiss MH. Petroclival meningiomas: Surgical experience in 109 cases. J Neurosurg 1996;84:20-8.
  • 5 Little KM, Friedman AH, Sampson JH, Wanibuchi M, Fukushima T. Surgical management of petroclival meningiomas: Defining resection goals based on risk of neurological morbidity and tumor recurrence rates in 137 patients. Neurosurgery 2005;56:546-59.
  • 6 Nanda A, Javalkar V, Banerjee AD. Petroclival meningiomas: Study on outcomes, complications and recurrence rates. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 2011;114:1268-77.
  • 7 Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN, Schessel D, Morita A. Petroclival meningiomas: Multimodality treatment and outcomes at longterm follow-up. Neurosurgery 2007;60:965-81.
  • 8 Park CK, Jung HW, Kim JE, Paek SH, Kim DG. The selection of the optimal therapeutic strategy for petroclival meningiomas. Surg Neurol 2006;66:160-6.
  • 9 Ramina R, Neto MC, Fernandes YB, Silva EB, Mattei TA, Aguiar PH. Surgical removal of small petroclival meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008;150:431-9.
  • 10 Rhoton AL Jr. The temporal bone and transtemporal approaches. Neurosurgery 2000;47(3 Suppl):S211-65.
  • 11 Roberti F, Sekhar LN, Kalavakonda C, Wright DC. Posterior fossa meningiomas: Surgical experience in 161 cases. Surg Neurol 2001;56:8-21.
  • 12 Roche PH, Pellet W, Fuentes S, Thomassin JM, Régis J. Gamma knife radiosurgical management of petroclival meningiomas results and indications. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003;145:883-8.
  • 13 Samii M, Ammirati M, Mahran A, Bini W, Sepehrnia A. Surgery of petroclival meningiomas: Report of 24 cases. Neurosurgery 1989;24:12-7.
  • 14 Seifert V. Clinical management of petroclival meningiomas and the eternal quest for preservation of quality of life: Personal experiences over a period of 20 years. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:1099-116.
  • 15 Spetzler RF, Daspit CP, Pappas CT. The combined supra- and infratentorial approach for lesions of the petrous and clival regions: Experience with 46 cases. J Neurosurg 1992;76:588-99.
  • 16 Xu F, Karampelas I, Megerian CA, Selman WR, Bambakidis NC. Petroclival meningiomas: An update on surgical approaches, decision making, and treatment results. Neurosurg Focus 2013;35:E11.
  • 17 Almefty R, Dunn IF, Pravdenkova S, Abolfotoh M, Al-Mefty O. True petroclival meningiomas: Results of surgical management. J Neurosurg 2014;120:40-51.
  • 18 Koutourousiou M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Vaz-Guimaraes Filho F, de Almeida JR, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, et al. Outcomes of endonasal and lateral approaches to petroclival meningiomas. World Neurosurg 2017;99:500-17.
  • 19 Gosal JS, Behari S, Joseph J, Jaiswal AK, Sardhara JC, Iqbal M, et al. Surgical excision of large-to-giant petroclival meningiomas focusing on the middle fossa approaches: The lessons learnt. Neurol India 2018;66:1434-46.
  • 20 Qiao L, Yu C, Zhang H, Zhang M, Qu Y, Ren M, et al. Clinical outcomes and survival analysis for petroclival meningioma patients receiving surgical resection: An analysis of 176 cases. Cancer Manag Res 2019;11:5949-59.
  • 21 Jung HW, Yoo H, Paek SH, Choi KS. Long-term outcome and growth rate of subtotally resected petroclival meningiomas: Experience with 38 cases. Neurosurgery 2000;46:567-75.
  • 22 Mathiesen T, Gerlich A, Kihlström L, Svensson M, BaggerSjöbäck D. Effects of using combined transpetrosal surgical approaches to treat petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2007;60:982-92.
  • 23 Flannery TJ, Kano H, Lunsford LD, Sirin S, Tormenti M, Niranjan A, et al. Long-term control of petroclival meningiomas through radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 2010;112:957-64.
  • 24 Erkmen K, Pravdenkova S, Al-Mefty O. Surgical management of petroclival meningiomas: Factors determining the choice of approach. Neurosurg Focus 2005;19:E7.
  • 25 Misra BK. Intracranial meningioma. In: Ramamurthi B, Tandon PN, editors. Textbook of Neurosurgery, 2nd ed. New Delhi: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. p. 1077-110.
  • 26 Sekhar LN, Jannetta PJ, Burkhart LE, Janosky JE. Meningiomas involving the clivus: A six-year experience with 41 patients. Neurosurgery 1990;27:764-81.
  • 27 Kawase T, Shiobara R, Toya S. Anterior transpetrosal-transtentorial approach for sphenopetroclival meningiomas: Surgical method and results in 10 patients. Neurosurgery 1991;28:869-75.
  • 28 Misra BK, Rout D, Rao VR, Rout A. Petroclival Meningioma: Surgical Experience with 11 Cases. Abstracts. 40th Annual Conference, Neurological Society of India, Manipal, India; 1991. p. 25.
  • 29 Ojemann RG. Skull-base surgery: A perspective. J Neurosurg 1992;76:569-70.
  • 30 Adachi K, Kawase T, Yoshida K, Yazaki T, Onozuka S. ABC surgical risk scale for skull base meningioma: A new scoring system for predicting the extent of tumor removal and neurological outcome. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 2009;111:1053-61.
  • 31 Al Mefty O, Smith RR. Clival and petroclival meningiomas. In: Al-Mefty O, editor. Meningiomas. New York: Raven Press; 1991. p. 517-37.
  • 32 Siwanuwatn R, Deshmukh P, Figueiredo EG, Crawford NR, Spetzler RF, Preul MC. Quantitative analysis of the working area and angle of attack for the retrosigmoid, combined petrosal, and transcochlear approaches to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg 2006;104:137-42.
  • 33 Chang SW, Wu A, Gore P, Beres E, Porter RW, Preul MC, et al. Quantitative comparison of Kawase's approach versus the retrosigmoid approach: Implications for tumors involving both middle and posterior fossae. Neurosurgery 2009;64:44-51.
  • 34 Misra BK. Management of central skull base tumors. In: Sindou M, editor. Practical Handbook of Neurosurgery: From Leading Neurosurgeons, Vol. 2. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 115-28.
  • 35 Kreil W, Luggin J, Fuchs I, Weigl V, Eustacchio S, Papaefthymiou G. Long term experience of gamma knife radiosurgery for benign skull base meningiomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1425-30.
  • 36 Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Ikeda H. Gamma knife radiosurgery for skull base meningioma: Long-term results of low-dose treatment. J Neurosurg 2008;109:804-10.
  • 37 Takanashi M, Fukuoka S, Hojyo A, Sasaki T, Nakagawara J, Nakamura H. Gamma knife radiosurgery for skull-base meningiomas. Prog Neurol Surg 2009;22:96-111.
  • 38 Zachenhofer I, Wolfsberger S, Aichholzer M, Bertalanffy A, Roessler K, Kitz K, et al. Gamma-knife radiosurgery for cranial base meningiomas: Experience of tumor control, clinical course, and morbidity in a follow-up of more than 8 years. Neurosurgery 2006;58:28-36.
  • 39 Misra BK. Surgical approaches to petroclival region. Prog Clin Neurosci 1999;14:183-92.
  • 40 Morita A, Coffey RJ, Foote RL, Schiff D, Gorman D. Risk of injury to cranial nerves after gamma knife radiosurgery for skull base meningiomas: Experience in 88 patients. J Neurosurg 1999;90:42-9.
  • 41 Misra BK. Management of petroclival meningioma: The role of excision and radiosurgery. In: Al-Mefty O, editor. Controversies in Neurosurgery II. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme Publishers; 2014. p. 30-6.