CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2020; 15(03): 674-677
DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_79_20
Case Report

Missing disc fragment: A rare surgical experience

Abhinandan Mallepally
Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi
,
Amrit Gantaguru
Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi
,
Nandan Marathe
Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi
,
Sanjay Meena
Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi
,
Vikas Tandon
Department of Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi
› Institutsangaben

About 35%–72% of lumbar disc herniations are associated with fragment migration. However, the posterior epidural migration is rare. We present a strange situation encountered during surgical decompression of the posterior migrated fragment. A 72-year-old male presented with a history of pain radiating to the left lower limb and Grade 3 power of the extensor hallucis longus. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a prolapsed intervertebral disc and a possible posterior epidural migration of disc fragment. Routine surgical steps for microdiscectomy were followed after confirmation of level using fluoroscopy. However, the extruded disc fragment was not seen, and both exiting and traversing roots were free with adequate mobility. After extensively searching for a disc in the spinal canal, suction fluid was filtered through a surgical mop used as a sieve. Material collected was sent for histopathological study. Biopsy report confirmed material filtered was indeed the intervertebral disc. Thus, accidental suction of disc material in case of the posterior epidural migrated disc is a possibility, and we should be vigilant about this scenario to avoid disaster.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 03. Mai 2020

Angenommen: 22. Mai 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. August 2022

© 2020. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Turan Y, Yilmaz T, Gocmez C, Ozevren H, Kemaloglu S, Teke M, et al. Posterior epidural migration of a sequestered lumbar intervertebral disc fragment. Turk Neurosurg 2017;27:85-94.
  • 2 Daghighi MH, Pouriesa M, Maleki M, Fouladi DF, Pezeshki MZ, Mazaheri Khameneh R, et al. Migration patterns of herniated disc fragments: A study on 1,020 patients with extruded lumbar disc herniation. Spine J 2014;14:1970-7.
  • 3 Mobbs RJ, Steel TR. Migration of lumbar disc herniation: An unusual case. J Clin Neurosci 2007;14:581-4.
  • 4 Tamburrelli FC, Perna A, Oliva MS, Giannelli I, Genitiempo M. Unusual posterior epidural migration of intervertebral herniated disc: A report of two cases. Malays Orthop J 2018;12:47-9.
  • 5 Deora H, Prabhuraj AR, Pruthi N. Posterior epidural migration of lumbar disc: Will the real “disc” please stand up? Surg Neurol Int 2017;8:302.
  • 6 Dösoǧlu M, Is M, Gezen F, Ziyal MI. Posterior epidural migration of a lumbar disc fragment causing cauda equina syndrome: Case report and review of the relevant literature. Eur Spine J 2001;10:348-51.
  • 7 Lakshmanan P, Ahuja S, Lyons K, Howes J, Davies PR. Sequestrated lumbar intervertebral disc in the posterior epidural space: A report on two cases and review of the literature. Spine J 2006;6:583-6.
  • 8 Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Universal protocol for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong person surgery. URL; 2004. Available from: http://www.jcaho.org/accredited+organi zations/patient+safety/universal+prot ocol/wss_universal+protocol.htm. [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 04].
  • 9 Sign, Mark and X-Ray” (SMaX). Available from: https://www.spine.org/Portals/0/A ssets/Downloads/ResearchClinicalCare/S MAX2014Revision.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 04].
  • 10 Ebraheim NA, Inzerillo C, Xu R. Are anatomic landmarks reliable in determination of fusion level in posterolateral lumbar fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:973-4.
  • 11 Ammerman JM, Ammerman MD. Wrong-sided surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2008;9:105-6.
  • 12 Ammerman JM, Ammerman MD, Dambrosia J, Ammerman BJ. A prospective evaluation of the role for intraoperative x-ray in lumbar discectomy. Predictors of incorrect level exposure. Surg Neurol 2006;66:470-3.