CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2018; 12(03): 375-379
DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_232_18
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Different pontic design for porcelain fused to metal fixed dental prosthesis: Contemporary guidelines and practice by general dental practitioners

Syed Murtaza Raza Kazmi
1   Department of Prosthodontics, Fatima Jinnah Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
,
Zahid Iqbal
2   Department of Prosthodontics, Fatima Memorial Hospital College of Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Muhammad Usman Muneer
3   Department of Prosthodontics, Lahore Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Samiya Riaz
4   Department of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
,
Muhammad Sohail Zafar
5   Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Madinah, Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia
6   Department of Dental Materials, Islamic International Dental College, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
16. September 2019 (online)

Zoom Image

ABSTRACT

Objective: The current study aimed to assess the knowledge and practice of pontic design selection by the general dental practitioners (GDPs) in the light of contemporary guidelines. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among the GDPs of Karachi. A questionnaire was designed to collect data from 100 GDPs. The questionnaire included general/demographic information (practitioner's education, experience, and place of practice) and an average number of fixed prosthesis constructed by the GDP. The questionnaire was further categorized to evaluate the knowledge/practice of pontic design selection and latest recommendations. Results: For the maxillary anterior segment, the ridge lap pontic was the most common (32%) followed by the modified ridge lap (28%). In the maxillary posterior segment, the ridge lap pontic was the most common (37%) followed by sanitary design (34%). For the mandibular anterior segment, the modified ridge lap (50%) was the most common followed by ridge lap pontic (17%). In case of the mandibular posterior segment, the sanitary design (34%) was the most common followed by ridge lap pontic (30%). Conclusions: The pontic design selection for the fixed prosthesis is a neglected domain. The contemporary guidelines are not followed with full spirit by the GDPs leading to wide variations in the pontic design selection.