Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2018; 12(04): 590-593
DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_241_17
Case Report
Dental Investigation Society

Esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth with different thicknesses of porcelain laminate veneers: An 8-year follow-up clinical evaluation

Tassiana Cançado Melo Sá
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
,
Monize Ferreira Figueiredo de Carvalho
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
,
Julio Celso M. de Sá
2   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Newton Paiva University Center, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
,
Claudia Silami Magalhães
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
,
Allyson Nogueira Moreira
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
,
Monica Yamauti
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

This clinical report describes an 8-year follow-up evaluation using different thicknesses of porcelain laminate veneers of diastema and malformed anterior teeth. Minimally invasive treatment with no preparation or minimal reduction options could be considered and chosen based on the characteristics of each case. Laminate veneers with or without reduction can offer an excellent result regarding esthetics and function. Despite its failure without reduction, this treatment is indicated because it can be applied regardless of the structure of the teeth. At first, no tooth preparation with rotatory instruments was performed, and porcelain laminates of minimum thickness were made for the four maxillary anterior teeth. After 6 years, the adhesive interfaces were stained, and the patient was unsatisfied with the esthetics of her smile. Therefore, at that time, the professional decided to prepare the anterior teeth for porcelain laminate veneers. Diastema closure and/or correction of malformed anterior teeth using porcelain laminate veneers is a viable option for the clinician because it restores esthetic harmony. The patient was very pleased with the new laminate veneers.

Key words:

Dental esthetic - dental laminate - veneers
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Cötert HS, Dündar M, Oztürk B. The effect of various preparation designs on the survival of porcelain laminate veneers. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11: 405-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation – A retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25: 9-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Andrade OS, Ferreira LA, Borges GA, Adolfi D. Ultimate ceramic veneers: A laboratory-guided preparation technique for minimally invasive restorations. Am J Esthet Dent 2013; 3: 8-22
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Strassler HE. Minimally invasive porcelain veneers: Indications for a conservative esthetic dentistry treatment modality. Gen Dent 2007; 55: 686-94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Stappert CF, Stathopoulou N, Gerds T, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of maxillary incisors, restored with different kinds of full veneers. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 266-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 da Cunha LF, Pedroche LO, Gonzaga CC, Furuse AY. Esthetic, occlusal, and periodontal rehabilitation of anterior teeth with minimum thickness porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1315-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Guzmán-Armstrong S, Maia RR. Conservative treatment planning in veneer replacement. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 393-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Calamia JR, Calamia CS. Porcelain laminate veneers: Reasons for 25 years of success. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51: 399-417 , ix
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fons-Font A, Solá-Ruíz MF, Granell-Ruíz M, Labaig-Rueda C, Martínez-González A. Choice of ceramic for use in treatments with porcelain laminate veneers. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006; 11: E297-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Schmitter M, Seydler BB. Minimally invasive lithium disilicate ceramic veneers fabricated using chairside CAD/CAM: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 107: 71-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Karagözoğlu İ, Toksavul S, Toman M. 3D quantification of clinical marginal and internal gap of porcelain laminate veneers with minimal and without tooth preparation and 2-year clinical evaluation. Quintessence Int 2016; 47: 461-71
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cho SH, Lopez A, Berzins DW, Prasad S, Ahn KW. Effect of different thicknesses of pressable ceramic veneers on polymerization of light-cured and dual-cured resin cements. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16: 347-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: A review of the literature. J Dent 2000; 28: 163-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Magne P, Kwon KR, Belser UC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Crack propensity of porcelain laminate veneers: A simulated operatory evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 327-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Albanesi RB, Pigozzo MN, Sesma N, Laganá DC, Morimoto S. Incisal coverage or not in ceramic laminate veneers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2016; 52: 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Tinschert J, Zweza D, Marxa R, Anusavice KJ. Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconia-based ceramics. J Dent 2000; 28: 529-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gonzaga CC, Cesar PF, Miranda Jr. WG, Yoshimura HN. Slow crack growth and reliability of dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 394-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Beier US, Kapferer I, Dumfahrt H. Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of 1,335 all-ceramic restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 70-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Radz GM. Minimum thickness anterior porcelain restorations. Dent Clin North Am 2011; 55: 353-70 , ix
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lin TM, Liu PR, Ramp LC, Essig ME, Givan DA, Pan YH. et al. Fracture resistance and marginal discrepancy of porcelain laminate veneers influenced by preparation design and restorative material in vitro . J Dent 2012; 40: 202-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar