Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2018; 12(01): 003-006
DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_307_17
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Influence of light activation of simplified adhesives on the shear bond strength of resin cements to a leucite-reinforced ceramic

Adilson Yoshio Furuse
1   Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
,
Cassiana Koch Scotti
1   Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
,
Alfredo Llerena-Icochea
1   Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
,
Juliana Fraga Soares Bombonatti
1   Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
,
Gisele Aihara Haragushiku
2   Graduate Program in Dentistry, Positivo University, Curitiba, Brazil
,
Carla Castiglia Gonzaga
2   Graduate Program in Dentistry, Positivo University, Curitiba, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective This study aims to evaluate the influence of the light activation of simplified adhesives on the shear bond strength of resin cements to a glass-ceramic. Three factors were evaluated: (1) cement in two levels (light cured and dual cured); (2) adhesive in two levels (Single Bond 2 and Single Bond Universal), and (3) light activation in two levels (yes or no). Materials and Methods Thirty-two 1-mm thick slices of a leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic (IPS Empress CAD) were divided into eight groups according to adhesive (Single Bond 2 or Single Bond Universal), cement (AllCem Veneer or AllCem), and light activation of the adhesive before application of the cement (yes or no). Ceramic surfaces were etched for 60 s with 5% hydrofluoric acid, and adhesives were applied. Four cement cylinders were made over each ceramic slice (n = 16) and then submitted to shear bond strength tests. Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed with three-way ANOVA and Tukey (⍺ = 0.05). Results: There were significant differences between adhesives (P < 0.0001) and no differences between cements (P = 0.0763) and light activation (P = 0.4385). No interaction effect occurred (P = 0.05). Single Bond 2 showed higher bond strength than Single Bond Universal. Conclusions: The light activation of the adhesive before the application of the resin cement did not influence the bond strength.

Key words:

Ceramics - dental adhesives - shear bond strength
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: Current thinking and trends. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48 : viii, 513-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: Historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J 2011; 56 (Suppl. 01) 84-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Olivera AB, Marques MM. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 332-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Manso AP, Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Pegoraro TA, Dias RA, Carvalho RM. et al. Cements and adhesives for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Clin North Am 2011; 55: 311-32 , ix
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composites to etchable ceramic surfaces – An insight review of the chemical aspects on surface conditioning. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 622-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Santos Jr GC, Santos MJ, Rizkalla AS. Adhesive cementation of etchable ceramic esthetic restorations. J Can Dent Assoc 2009; 75: 379-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lührs AK, De Munck J, Geurtsen W, Van Meerbeek B. Composite cements benefit from light-curing. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 292-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Vanderlei A, Passos SP, Özcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Durability of adhesion between feldspathic ceramic and resin cements: Effect of adhesive resin, polymerization mode of resin cement, and aging. J Prosthodont 2013; 22: 196-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chen L, Suh BI. Effect of hydrophilicity on the compatibility between a dual-curing resin cement and one-bottle simplified adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15: 325-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 542-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 267-82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CK, Sanares AM, Wei SH. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 27-40
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C, Chuang SF, Li F. et al. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 91-105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Borges GA, Faria JS, Agarwal P, Spohr AM, Correr-Sobrinho L, Miranzi BA. et al. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems before and after cementation. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 641-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gaintantzopoulou MD, El-Damanhoury HM. Effect of preparation depth on the marginal and internal adaptation of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture endocrowns. Oper Dent 2016; 41: 607-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ganapathy D, Sathyamoorthy A, Ranganathan H, Murthykumar K. Effect of resin bonded luting agents influencing marginal discrepancy in all ceramic complete veneer crowns. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10: ZC67-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kocaaǧaoǧlu H, Albayrak H, Kilinc HI, Gümüs HÖ. Effect of repeated ceramic firings on the marginal and internal adaptation of metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118: 672-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh B, Carvalho R, Miller M. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 271-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. et al. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 17-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Furuse AY, Santana LO, Rizzante FA, Ishikiriama SK, Bombonatti JF, Correr GM. et al. Delayed light activation improves color stability of dual-cured resin cements. J Prosthodont 2016 DOI: doi:10.1111/jopr.12509.
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Calgaro PA, Furuse AY, Correr GM, Ornaghi BP, Gonzaga CC. Influence of the interposition of ceramic spacers on the degree of conversion and the hardness of resin cements. Braz Oral Res 2013; 27: 403-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Furuse AY, Glir DH, Rizzante FA, Prochnow R, Borges AF, Gonzaga CC. Degree of conversion of a flowable composite light-activated through ceramics of different shades and thicknesses. Braz J Oral Sci 2015; 14: 230-3
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Runnacles P, Correr GM, Baratto Filho F, Gonzaga CC, Furuse AY. Degree of conversion of a resin cement light-cured through ceramic veneers of different thicknesses and types. Braz Dent J 2014; 25: 38-42
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Watanabe H, Kazama R, Asai T, Kanaya F, Ishizaki H, Fukushima M. et al. Efficiency of dual-cured resin cement polymerization induced by high-intensity LED curing units through ceramic material. Oper Dent 2015; 40: 153-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B. et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012; 40: 475-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. et al. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013; 41: 404-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sarr M, Kane AW, Vreven J, Mine A, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M. et al. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial characterization of 11 contemporary adhesives bonded to bur-cut dentin. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 94-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. et al. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 864-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Vogl V, Hiller KA, Buchalla W, Federlin M, Schmalz G. Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive system/resin cement: Results after 18 months. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 2481-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA. Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of “macro” test methods. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e38-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar