Optimization of scanning electron microscope technique for amniotic membrane investigation: A preliminary study

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the two scanning electron microscope (SEM) preparation protocols and determine the better SEM preparation technique to study stem cells on human amniotic membrane (hAM) scaffold. Materials and Methods: Formaldehyde-based protocol and glutaraldehyde-based protocol were compared to evaluate the quality of SEM images for stem cells cultured on hAM scaffold. Results: The results suggested that formaldehyde-based protocol is better than glutaraldehyde-based protocol in terms of showing clearer topography of the membrane as well as the boarders of the cells. To provide intact surface of the SEM sample and avoid possible ruptures of the hAM or the thin cell layer, it is recommended to perform the dehydration step using graded alcohol concentrations of 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90%, one time for each and twice in 100% for 10 min each. Gold sputter-coating step is not recommended as it does not improve the image quality. Conclusions: To obtain clear SEM images, it is recommended to run a preliminary study to determine the better chemicals and conditions of sample preparation even when following preexisting protocols.

Key words:

Amniotic membrane - cell attachment - gold sputter-coating - scaffold - scanning electron microscope

• REFERENCES

• 1 Russell SD, Daghlian CP. Scanning electron microscopic observations on deembedded biological tissue sections: Comparison of different fixatives and embedding materials. Microsc Res Tech 1985; 2: 489-95
• 2 Kiernan JA. Formaldehyde, formalin, paraformaldehyde and glutaraldehyde: What they are and what they do. Microsc Today 2000; 1: 8-12
• 3 Helander KG. Kinetic studies of formaldehyde binding in tissue. Biotech Histochem 1994; 69: 177-9
• 4 Monsan P, Puzo G, Mazarguil H. Mechanism of glutaraldehyde-protein bond formation. Biochimie 1975; 57: 1281-92
• 5 Jeffree CE, Read ND. Ambient-and low-temperature scanning electron microscopy. Electron Microsc Plant Cell 1991; p. 313-414
• 6 Suzuki E. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy of immunogold-labelled cells by the use of thin plasma coating of osmium. J Microsc 2002; 208: 153-7
• 7 Seligman AM, Wasserkrug HL, Hanker JS. A new staining method (OTO) for enhancing contrast of lipid – Containing membranes and droplets in osmium tetroxide – Fixed tissue with osmiophilic thiocarbohydrazide (TCH). J Cell Biol 1966; 30: 424-32
• 8 Malak TM, Ockleford CD, Bell SC, Dalgleish R, Bright N, Macvicar J. et al. Confocal immunofluorescence localization of collagen typesI, III, IV, V and VI and their ultrastructural organization in term human fetal membranes. Placenta 1993; 14: 385-406
• 9 Niknejad H, Peirovi H, Jorjani M, Ahmadiani A, Ghanavi J, Seifalian AM. et al. Properties of the amniotic membrane for potential use in tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater 2008; 15: 88-99
• 10 Riau AK, Beuerman RW, Lim LS, Mehta JS. Preservation, sterilization and de-epithelialization of human amniotic membrane for use in ocular surface reconstruction. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 216-25
• 11 Koizumi N, Fullwood NJ, Bairaktaris G, Inatomi T, Kinoshita S, Quantock AJ. et al. Cultivation of corneal epithelial cells on intact and denuded human amniotic membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 2506-13
• 12 Nakamura T, Endo K, Cooper LJ, Fullwood NJ, Tanifuji N, Tsuzuki M. et al. The successful culture and autologous transplantation of rabbit oral mucosal epithelial cells on amniotic membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 106-16
• 13 Ishino Y, Sano Y, Nakamura T, Connon CJ, Rigby H, Fullwood NJ. et al. Amniotic membrane as a carrier for cultivated human corneal endothelial cell transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 800-6
• 14 Nakamura T, Yoshitani M, Rigby H, Fullwood NJ, Ito W, Inatomi T. et al. Sterilized, freeze-dried amniotic membrane: A useful substrate for ocular surface reconstruction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 93-9
• 15 Hopkinson A, Shanmuganathan VA, Gray T, Yeung AM, Lowe J, James DK. et al. Optimization of amniotic membrane (AM) denuding for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2008; 14: 371-81
• 16 Hwang YC, Kim DH, Hwang IN, Song SJ, Park YJ, Koh JT. et al. Chemical constitution, physical properties, and biocompatibility of experimentally manufactured Portland cement. J Endod 2011; 37: 58-62
• 17 Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Gutwald R, Lauer G, Hübner U, Schmelzeisen R. How to optimize seeding and culturing of human osteoblast-like cells on various biomaterials. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 3319-28
• 18 Koizumi N, Rigby H, Fullwood NJ, Kawasaki S, Tanioka H, Koizumi K. et al. Comparison of intact and denuded amniotic membrane as a substrate for cell-suspension culture of human limbal epithelial cells. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007; 245: 123-34
• 19 Nakamura T, Sekiyama E, Takaoka M, Bentley AJ, Yokoi N, Fullwood NJ. et al. The use of trehalose-treated freeze-dried amniotic membrane for ocular surface reconstruction. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 3729-37
• 20 Adachi K, Amemiya T, Nakamura T, Honjyo K, Kumamoto S, Yamamoto T. et al. Human periodontal ligament cell sheets cultured on amniotic membrane substrate. Oral Dis 2014; 20: 582-90