Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: An in vitro study

ABSTRACT

Objective: The apical constriction (AC) and the apical foramen (AF) are the principal reference points used to determine the apical limit for instrumentation and root canal filling. AC varies in different races, and the aim of the current study was to measure and compare the distances from AC to AF and the anatomical apex (AA) in incisor and molar teeth in the Iranian population. Materials and Methods: Forty-five roots of incisor teeth and 45 roots of molar teeth were selected randomly in Isfahan Province, Iran. If the foramen was located toward the mesial or distal side of the apex, the cut was made mesiodistally, and if it was toward the buccal or lingual side, the section was made accordingly. Roots were examined under a microscope at ×25 magnification. The distances from AC to AF and AA were then estimated using a Motic camera. Descriptive statistics were used. The independent t-test was also used to compare distances in incisors and molars, and P = 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance. Results: The mean distances between AC and AF were 0.847 ± 0.33 mm in incisors and 0.709 ± 0.27 mm in molars. The mean distances between AC and AA were 1.23 ± 0.39 mm in incisors and 1.01 ± 0.38 mm in molars. In an independent t-test, the distances between AC and AF differed significantly in incisors and molars (P = 0.035), but the distances between AC and AA did not (P = 0.172). Conclusion: The end points for root canal therapy should be 0.85 mm in incisors and 0.70 mm in molars.

Key words:

Anatomical apex - apical constriction - apical foramen

• REFERENCES

• 1 Vertucci FJ, Haddix JE, Britto LR. Tooth morphology and access cavity preparation. In Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. editors Pathways of the Pulp. 9th. edition St Louis, Mo, USA: Mosby; 2006: 148-232
• 2 Peters O, Koka R. Preparation of coronal and radicular spaces Endodontics. 6th. Hamilton, Canada: BC Decker Inc.; 2008: 877-991
• 3 Kuttler Y. Microscopic investigation of root apexes. J Am Dent Assoc 1955; 50: 544-52
• 4 Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: A review. J Endod 2004; 30: 559-67
• 5 Ravanshad S, Adl A, Anvar J. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or radiography on the adequacy of final working length: A randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2010; 36: 1753-6
• 6 Dummer PM, McGinn JH, Rees DG. The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J 1984; 17: 192-8
• 7 Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 33: 101-10
• 8 Levy AB, Glatt L. Deviation of the apical foramen from the radiographic apex. J N J State Dent Soc 1970; 41: 12-3
• 9 Scarfe WC, Fana Jr CR, Farman AG. Radiographic detection of accessory/lateral canals: Use of RadioVisioGraphy and Hypaque. J Endod 1995; 21: 185-90
• 10 Plotino G, Grande NM, Pecci R, Bedini R, Pameijer CH, Somma F. et al. Three-dimensional imaging using microcomputed tomography for studying tooth macromorphology. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 1555-61
• 11 Sberna MT, Rizzo G, Zacchi E, Capparè P, Rubinacci A. A preliminary study of the use of peripheral quantitative computed tomography for investigating root canal anatomy. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 66-75
• 12 Boruah LC, Bhuyan AC. Morphologic characteristics of root canal of mandibular incisors in North-East Indian population: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2011; 14: 346-50
• 13 Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod 2004; 30: 391-8
• 14 Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: A literature review. J Endod 2006; 32: 813-21
• 15 Tilk MA, Lommel TJ, Gerstein H. A study of mandibular and maxillary root widths to determine dowel size. J Endod 1979; 5: 79-82
• 16 Woelfel JB, Scheid RC. editors Basic terminology for understanding tooth morphology. In Dental Anatomy: Its Relevance to Dentistry. 5th. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997: 87-118
• 17 Arora S, Tewari S. The morphology of the apical foramen in posterior teeth in a North Indian population. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 930-9
• 18 Nasseri M, Ahangari Z, Momayyez M. Evaluation of the distance of apical constriction from anatomic and radiographic apices in extracted maxillary second premolars using the clearing technique. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci 2012; 30: 95-9
• 19 Marroquín BB, El-Sayed MA, Willershausen-Zönnchen B. Morphology of the physiological foramen: I. Maxillary and mandibular molars. J Endod 2004; 30: 321-8
• 20 Stein TJ, Corcoran JF. Nonionizing method of locating the apical constriction (minor foramen) in root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 71: 96-9
• 21 Piasecki L, Carneiro E, da Silva Neto UX, Westphalen VP, Brandão CG, Gambarini G. et al. The use of micro-computed tomography to determine the accuracy of 2 electronic apex locators and anatomic variations affecting their precision. J Endod 2016; 42: 1263-7
• 22 Hassanien EE, Hashem A, Chalfin H. Histomorphometric study of the root apex of mandibular premolar teeth: An attempt to correlate working length measured with electronic and radiograph methods to various anatomic positions in the apical portion of the canal. J Endod 2008; 34: 408-12
• 23 Kim E, Lee SJ. Electronic apex locator. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48: 35-54