Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2018; 7(02): 41-45
DOI: 10.4103/ejgd.ejgd_54_18
Original Article

A survey on preference for continuing professional development among general dental practitioners in Malaysia: A pilot study

Nor Faharina Abdul Hamid
Centre of Restorative Dentistry Studies, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sungai Buloh Campus, Jalan Hospital, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
,
Nur Hafizah Kamar Affendi
Centre of Restorative Dentistry Studies, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sungai Buloh Campus, Jalan Hospital, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
,
Nur Elida Shahira Khairul Anwar
Centre of Restorative Dentistry Studies, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sungai Buloh Campus, Jalan Hospital, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
,
Nur Fara Izani Muhammad Nor Ikhwan Tan
Centre of Restorative Dentistry Studies, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sungai Buloh Campus, Jalan Hospital, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background: Continuing Professional Development (CPD) is the fundamental components of the Malaysian Dental Council’s policy for improving clinical governance within the dental profession in Malaysia. In Malaysia, participation in CPD activities is compulsory for renewal of practices license. Aim: This study was undertaken to investigate the current CPD practices of Malaysian general dental practitioner (GDP) and to identify the participations in CPD among GDP in Malaysia. Materials and Methods: A total of 114 GDP who attended three CPD program at the Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA were invited to participate in a paper-based questionnaire survey to assess their awareness, participation, and opinion toward the CPD program. Results: Of 110 respondents, 81.7% kept a CPD portfolio. About 93.9% of GDP agree it is important to engage with CPD program. Topic in restorative dentistry, esthetic dentistry, and endodontics attracted high level of interest among GDP, while biostatic was the least preferred. Full-day duration hands-on workshops on Sunday and Saturday was the most preferred CPD programs by most of the respondents. Nearly, 83.3% of GDP considered that lack of time was the main obstacles for attending CPD. Conclusion: This study will provide valuable information to assist Malaysian CPD providers and organizers to formulate appropriate approaches and topics during the planning and conducting the CPD courses and programs according to the needs and actual demands.

Keywords

Continuing Professional Development - dentistry - Malaysia

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.




Publication History

Article published online:
01 November 2021

© 2018. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Barnes E, Bullock AD, Bailey SE, Cowpe JG, Karaharju-Suvanto T. A review of continuing professional development for dentists in Europe(*). Eur J Dent Educ 2013;17 Suppl 1:5-17.
  • 2 Abbott P, Burgess K, Wang E, Kim K. Analysis of dentists’ participation in continuing professional development courses from 2001-2006. Open Dent J 2010;4:179-84.
  • 3 Ireland RS, Palmer NO, Bickley SR. A survey of general dental practitioners’ postgraduate education activity and demand for extended modular postgraduate programmes. Br Dent J 1999;187:502-6.
  • 4 Chan WC, Ng CH, Yiu BK, Liu CY, Ip CM, Siu HH, et al. Asurvey on the preference for continuing professional dental education amongst general dental practitioners who attended the 26th Asia pacific dental congress. Eur J Dent Educ 2006;10:210-6.
  • 5 Malaysian Dental Council. Guidelines on Continuing Professional Development for Dental Practitioners in Malaysia; June, 2011. p. 1-20.
  • 6 Sturrock JB, Lennie SC. Compulsory continuing professional development: A questionnaire-based survey of the UK dietetic profession. J Hum Nutr Diet 2009;22:12-20.
  • 7 Malaysian Dental Council. MDC Annual Report; 2016. p. 1-63.
  • 8 Ministry of Health Singapore. Public consultation on the proposed compulsory continuing professional development programme for dentistry; 2004. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/dam/moh_web/Legislations/e-Consultation/Past%20Consultations/pub_consult_prof_dentistry.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Apr 28].
  • 9 Best HA, Messer LB. Professional development for dentists: Patterns and their implications. Aust Dent J 2001;46:289-97.
  • 10 Stewart C, Kinirons M. Dentists’ requirements for continuing professional development in Ireland. A pilot study conducted at university college cork. J Ir Dent Assoc 2015;61:40-4.