CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2018; 39(04): 463-466
DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_136_17
Original Article

Compliance of Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act among Tobacco Vendors, Educational Institutions, and Public Places in Bengaluru City

Naveen Chandrahas Khargekar
Department of Community Oncology, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Arpan Debnath
Department of Public Health Dentistry, KLE Institute of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Nitin Ravindra Khargekar
Department of Orthodontics, Sri Venkateshwara College of Dental Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Punith Shetty
Department of Community Oncology, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Vandana Khargekar
Department of Community Medicne, BGSglobal Institute of Medical Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Abstract

Background: Tobacco has been the arch criminal of most head-and-neck cancers in the world. Many laws have been implemented to control this menace, but still this slow poison persists. Effectiveness of these laws has always been a matter of concern to the authorities. The present study was conducted to observe the compliance of Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) among public places, educational institutions, and tobacco vendors in Bengaluru city. Methodology: A cross-sectional, observational study was done to assess the violations at public places, educational institutions, and tobacco vendors. Violations for Sections 4, 5, 6, and 7 of COTPA were assessed from 25 each of these places in the eight zones of Bengaluru city. The study areas were chosen by convenience sampling method, and using a questionnaire, the violations were recorded. Data were analyzed in Microsoft Excel to find out the percentage of violations. Results: The COTPA Sections 4 and 5 violation was 134 (67%) and 94 (47%), respectively. A total of 124 (62%) of the educational institutions had tobacco vendors within 100 yards, and only 30 (15%) had signboard for the prohibition of tobacco use. Around 14 tobacco vendors had beedis without proper pictorial warning with them which violated Section 7 of COTPA. Conclusion: For proper implementation of COTPA laws, we should create awareness about the laws, what amounts to violations and also the health hazards to tobacco use among general population. The law enforcing personnel should act on those who violate the law. There is a need for a sensitization workshop and advocacy for all the stakeholders.



Publication History

Article published online:
17 June 2021

© 2018. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Cancer Prevention. World Health Organization. Available from: http://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/en/. [Last accessed on 2017 May 25].
  • 2 Thakur JS, Garg R, Narain JP, Menabde N. Tobacco use: A major risk factor for non communicable diseases in South-East Asia region. Indian J Public Health 2011; 55: 155-60
  • 3 Tobacco, Health Topics. World Health Organization. Available from: http://www.searo.who.int/india/topics/tobacco/en/. [Last accessed on 2017 May 25].
  • 4 Lecours N, Almeida GE, Abdallah JM, Novotny TE. Environmental health impacts of tobacco farming: A review of the literature. Tob Control 2012; 21: 191-6
  • 5 Novotny TE, Bialous SA, Burt L, Curtis C, da Costa VL, Iqtidar SU. et al. The environmental and health impacts of tobacco agriculture, cigarette manufacture and consumption. Bull World Health Organ 2015; 93: 877-80
  • 6 Reddy KS, Gupta PC. editors Report on Tobacco Control in India. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2004
  • 7 John RM, Rao RK, Rao MG, Moore J, Deshpande RS, Sengupta J. et al. The Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Taxation in India. Paris: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease; 2010: 1-52
  • 8 Kaur J, Jain DC. Tobacco control policies in India: Implementation and challenges. Indian J Public Health 2011; 55: 220-7
  • 9 The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003; An Act Enacted by the Parliament of Republic of India by Notification in the Official Gazette; (Act 32 of 2003).
  • 10 Global Adult Tobacco Survey. Fact Sheet, India 2009-2010. Available from: http://www.who.int/tobacco/surveillance/en_tfi_india_gats_fact_sheet.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 May 25].
  • 11 Tripathy JP, Goel S, Patro BK. Compliance monitoring of prohibition of smoking (under section-4 of COTPA) at a tertiary health-care institution in a smoke-free city of India. Lung India 2013; 30: 312-5
  • 12 Goel S, Ravindra K, Singh RJ, Sharma D. Effective smoke-free policies in achieving a high level of compliance with smoke-free law: Experiences from a district of North India. Tob Control 2014; 23: 291-4
  • 13 Chaudhry S, Chaudhry S, Chaudhry K. Point of sale tobacco advertisements in India. Indian J Cancer 2007; 44: 131-6
  • 14 Pimple S, Gunjal S, Mishra GA, Pednekar MS, Majmudar P, Shastri SS. et al. Compliance to Gutka ban and other provisons of COTPA in Mumbai. Indian J Cancer 2014; 51 (01) S60-6
  • 15 Goel S, Kumar R, Lal P, Tripathi J, Singh RJ, Rathinam A. et al. How compliant are tobacco vendors to India’s tobacco control legislation on Ban of advertisments at point of sale? A three jurisdictions review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014; 15: 10637-42