Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2020; 41(02): 202-208
DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_155_19
Original Article

Hypomethylating Agents Use in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center Experience

Sravan Kumar Bodepudi
Department of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Santhosh Kumar Devdas
Department of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Vinayak V Maka
Department of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Palassery Rasmi
Department of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Sumathi S Hiregoudar
Transfusion Medicine and Blood Centre, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
,
Nalini Kilara
Department of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations Financial support and sponsorship Nil.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Context: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease. Approximately 80% of older AML patients will die of their disease or its treatment with currently available antileukemic therapy because of the adverse prognostic risk factors. In elderly patients who are not candidates for induction chemotherapy (IC) or who declines IC, the preferred induction regimen is with hypomethylating agents (HMAs). In India, data regarding therapy with HMA, response to therapy and overall survival (OS) is seldom reported. Aims: This study aims to study the response rate and survival of patients treated with HMAs in whom IC was not feasible. Settings and Design: This is retrospective and descriptive single-center study. Subjects and Methods: Data of newly diagnosed AML patients who were unfit for IC and treated with HMA in our institution was collected retrospectively and analyzed. Results: Twenty-three patients received HMAs as a treatment for AML. Eight (34.7%) of 23 patients had initial response to therapy (two [25%] had complete remission [CR], four [50%] had CR with incomplete hematologic recovery, one [12.5%] had partial remission) and one (12.5%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survival and OS observed are 6.06 ± 0.65 months and 7 ± 1.32 months, respectively. Conclusions: HMAs provide an important additional treatment option in newly diagnosed AML patients who are older, with poor performance status, higher comorbidity indices, and who refuse IC.

Keywords

Hypomethylating agents - induction chemotherapy - performance status


Publication History

Received: 18 May 2019

Accepted: 29 December 2019

Article published online:
23 May 2021

© 2020. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Döhner H, Weisdorf DJ, Bloomfield CD. Acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1136-52
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Ley TJ, Miller C, Ding L, Raphael BJ, Mungall AJ. et al. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 2059-74
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Dombret H, Gardin C. An update of current treatments for adult acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2016; 127: 53-61
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Ver. 2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2019. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/aml.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Mar 27]
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Grønbaek K, Hother C, Jones PA. Epigenetic changes in cancer. APMIS 2007; 115: 1039-59
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Jones PA, Baylin SB. The epigenomics of cancer. Cell 2007; 128: 683-92
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Jasielec J, Saloura V, Godley LA. The mechanistic role of DNA methylation in myeloid leukemogenesis. Leukemia 2014; 28: 1765-73
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373-83
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, Baron F, Sandmaier BM, Maloney DG. et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: A new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood 2005; 106: 2912-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, Büchner T, Willman CL, Estey EH. et al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 4642-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 de Greef GE, van Putten WL, Boogaerts M, Huijgens PC, Verdonck LF, Vellenga E. et al. Criteria for defining a complete remission in acute myeloid leukaemia revisited. An analysis of patients treated in HOVON-SAKK co-operative group studies. Br J Haematol 2005; 128: 184-91
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Gale RP, Barosi G, Barbui T, Cervantes F, Dohner K, Dupriez B. et al. What are RBC-transfusion-dependence and-independence?. Leuk Res 2011; 35: 8-11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Philip C, George B, Ganapule A, Korula A, Jain P, Alex AA. et al. Acute myeloid leukaemia: Challenges and real world data from India. Br J Haematol 2015; 170: 110-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Silverman LR, Demakos EP, Peterson BL, Kornblith AB, Holland JC, Odchimar-Reissig R. et al. Randomized controlled trial of azacitidine in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome: A study of the cancer and leukemia group B. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 2429-40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellström-Lindberg E, Santini V, Gattermann N, Germing U. et al. Azacitidine prolongs overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in elderly patients with low bone marrow blast count acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 562-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Silverman LR, McKenzie DR, Peterson BL, Holland JF, Backstrom JT, Beach CL. et al. Further analysis of trials with azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: Studies 8421, 8921, and 9221 by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 3895-903
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Pleyer L, Stauder R, Burgstaller S, Schreder M, Tinchon C, Pfeilstocker M. et al. Azacitidine in patients with WHO-defined AML – Results of 155 patients from the Austrian Azacitidine Registry of the AGMT-Study Group. J Hematol Oncol 2013; 6: 32
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Pleyer L, Burgstaller S, Girschikofsky M, Linkesch W, Stauder R, Pfeilstocker M. et al. Azacitidine in 302 patients with WHO-defined acute myeloid leukemia: Results from the Austrian Azacitidine Registry of the AGMT-Study Group. Ann Hematol 2014; 93: 1825-38
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Thépot S, Itzykson R, Seegers V, Recher C, Raffoux E, Quesnel B. et al. Azacitidine in untreated acute myeloid leukemia: A report on 149 patients: Azacitidine in frontline AML. Am J Hematol 2014; 89: 410-6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Lübbert M, Rüter BH, Claus R, Schmoor C, Schmid M, Germing U. et al. A multicenter phase II trial of decitabine as first-line treatment for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia judged unfit for induction chemotherapy. Haematologica 2012; 97: 393-401
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kantarjian HM, Thomas XG, Dmoszynska A, Wierzbowska A, Mazur G, Mayer J. et al. Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of decitabine versus patient choice, with physician advice, of either supportive care or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 2670-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kadia TM, Thomas XG, Dmoszynska A, Wierzbowska A, Minden M, Arthur C. et al. Decitabine improves outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia and higher blast counts. Am J Hematol 2015; 90: E139-41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Kantarjian H, Ravandi F, O’Brien S, Cortes J, Faderl S, Garcia-Manero G. et al. Intensive chemotherapy does not benefit most older patients (age 70 years or older) with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2010; 116: 4422-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Raffoux E, Cras A, Recher C, Boëlle PY, de Labarthe A, Turlure P. et al. Phase 2 clinical trial of 5-azacitidine, valproic acid, and all-trans retinoic acid in patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Oncotarget 2010; 1: 34-42
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Döhner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Büchner T, Burnett AK. et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: Recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 2010; 115: 453-74
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Cashen AF, Schiller GJ, O’Donnell MR, DiPersio JF. Multicenter, phase II study of decitabine for the first-line treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 556-61
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Dombret H, Seymour JF, Butrym A, Wierzbowska A, Selleslag D, Jang JH. et al. International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs. conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with and 30% blasts. Blood 2015; 126: 291-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar