CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2018; 39(04): 521-523
DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_37_17
Practitioner Section

An Unusual Presentation of Prostate Carcinoma

Greeshma Sadasivan
Departments of General Medicine, Coimbatore Medical College Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
R Arul
Departments of Nephrology, Coimbatore Medical College Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
A Prabaharan
Departments of Nephrology, Coimbatore Medical College Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Abstract

Prostate carcinoma is the second most common cancer among men worldwide. Although prostate carcinoma is common, its presentation resembling retroperitoneal fibrosis is uncommon. We report a patient with prostate carcinoma mimicking retroperitoneal fibrosis. An elderly male presenting in a volume overload state with features of obstructive uropathy was diagnosed as a case of prostate carcinoma. Magnetic resonance imaging was suggestive of retroperitoneal fibrosis. The presentation of prostate carcinoma as retroperitoneal fibrosis is rare.



Publication History

Article published online:
17 June 2021

© 2018. Indian Society of Medical and Paediatric Oncology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Powell CR, Schwartz BF, Stoney RJ, Stoller ML. Gross hematuria secondary to renal vein hypertension from unilateral retroperitoneal fibrosis. Urology 2000; 55: 436
  • 2 Kottra JJ, Dunnick NR. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. Radiol Clin North Am 1996; 34: 1259-75
  • 3 Vivas I, Nicolás AI, Velázquez P, Elduayen B, Fernández-Villa T, Martínez-Cuesta A. Retroperitoneal fibrosis: Typical and atypical manifestations. Br J Radiol 2000; 73: 214-22
  • 4 Amis Jr. ES. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 321-9
  • 5 Bonekamp D, Jacobs MA, El-Khouli R, Stoianovici D, Macura KJ. Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: From diagnosis to interventions. Radiographics 2011; 31: 677-703
  • 6 van Bommel EF. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. Neth J Med 2002; 60: 231-42
  • 7 Miller OF, Smith LJ, Ferrara EX, McAleer IM, Kaplan GW. Presentation of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis in the pediatric population. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38: 1685-8
  • 8 Monev S. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: Prompt diagnosis preserves organ function. Cleveland Clin J Med 2002; 69: 160-6
  • 9 Loeb S, Carter HB. Early detection, diagnosis, and staging of prostate cancer. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA. editors Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Ch. 99 Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2011
  • 10 Caiafa RO, Vinuesa AS, Izquierdo RS, Brufau BP, Ayuso Colella JR, Molina CN. Retroperitoneal fibrosis: Role of imaging in diagnosis and follow-up. Radiographics 2013; 33: 535-52
  • 11 Verma S, Rajesh A. A clinically relevant approach to imaging prostate cancer: Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196 (03) Suppl S1-10
  • 12 Verma S, Turkbey B, Muradyan N, Rajesh A, Cornud F, Haider MA. et al. Overview of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 1277-88
  • 13 Ilie CP, Pemberton RJ, Tolley DA. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: The case for nonsurgical treatment. BJU Int 2006; 98: 137-40
  • 14 Tomita Y, Morishita H, Saitoh R. Successful treatment of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis with steroid administration in a patient with a positive gallium scan. Clin Nucl Med 1993; 18: 1042-4
  • 15 Kermani TA, Crowson CS, Achenbach SJ, Luthra HS. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: A retrospective review of clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes. Mayo Clin Proc 2011; 86: 297-303