Ecological Analysis to Study Association between Prevalence of Smokeless Tobacco Type and Head-and-Neck Cancer

Abstract

Context: Head-and-neck cancers (HNCs) are most common cancer in Indian cancer registries. However, there is a huge variation and heterogeneity in use of different types of smokeless tobacco (SLT) consumption across India. Aims: The aims and objectives of this study were to investigate how different types of SLT use are distributed across Indian states and examined its association with different subsites of HNC incidence rates. Settings and Design: Ecological analysis of correlation between SLT prevalence and incidence rates from population-based cancer registries. Methods: Incidence data was extracted from population-based cancer registries report from the National Cancer Registry Programme database 2012–2014. The current SLT uses the prevalence of all Indian States and Union territories from Global Adult Tobacco Survey 2009–2010. Statistical Analysis Used: Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to estimate an ecological correlation between the prevalence of types of SLT uses in different region of India and age-adjusted incidence rate of different subsites of HNC. Results: In our brief analysis, we found a significant correlation between certain types of SLT use and subsite of HNC. Betel quid and tobacco use are correlated (r = 0.53) with oropharynx cancer incidence. Khaini use is correlated with hypopharynx cancer incidence (r = 0.48). Gutka use is correlated with mouth cancer incidence (r = 0.54). Oral tobacco is correlated with mouth cancer incidence (r = 0.46). Other SLT use is correlated for hypopharynx cancer incidence (r = 0.47). Conclusions: The variations in SLT use across Indian states account for differences in incidence rates of HNC subsites across the states. The inferences from this brief analysis can be used as a base to modify and design observational epidemiological studies in the future.

Keywords

Ecological correlation - head-and-neck cancer - smokeless tobacco

• References

• 1 Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11. Lyon, France. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013, 2018. Available from: http://www.globocan.iarc.fr. [Last accessed on 2016 Apr 26].
• 2 Three Year Population Report of Population based Cancer Registries 2012–14. National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research-National Cancer Registry Programme (ICMR), Bangalore; 2018. Available from: Available from: http://www.ncdirindia.org/NCRP/ALL_NCRP_REPORTS/PBCR_REPORT_2012_2014/index.htm. [Last accessed on 2016 Apr 26].
• 3 Global Adult Tobacco Survey. India, Report, 2009-2010. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/tobacco/surveillance/survey/gats/ind/en/. [Last accessed on 2016 Apr 26].
• 4 Muttagi SS, Chaturvedi P, Gaikwad R, Singh B, Pawar P. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in chronic areca nut chewing Indian women: Case series and review of literature. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2012; 33: 32-5
• 5 Bhisey RA. Chemistry and toxicology of smokeless tobacco. Indian J Cancer 2012; 49: 364-72
• 6 Stepanov I, Hecht SS, Ramakrishnan S, Gupta PC. Tobacco-specific nitrosamines in smokeless tobacco products marketed in India. Int J Cancer 2005; 116: 16-9