ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim is to assess the practice of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis among
the plastic surgeons attending National Academy of Burns India Conference 2012 (NABICON
2012). Background: DVT prophylaxis in burns is a controversial issue as there is no consensus among
the community of burn surgeons about the prevalence of DVT, the incidence of pulmonary
embolism, the indications for DVT prophylaxis, dosage and duration of low molecular
weight heparins (LMWH) and the complications related to DVT and LMWH. Methodology: A survey was conducted among plastic surgeons attending the NABICON 2012 held at
New Delhi, by circulating a questionnaire. The respondents were divided into two groups
based on whether burns constituted more than or less than 50% of their practice. The
data thus collected were tabulated and analysed. Results: Almost 70% of all the respondents practice some form of DVT prophylaxis. There was
significantly higher incidence of complications related to the use of LMWH among the
surgeons whose practice of burns was >50%. There was no significant difference between
the two groups in relation to the incidence and complication of DVT or recommendation
of DVT prophylaxis. Conclusion: Majority of plastic surgeons practice DVT prophylaxis routinely and consider multiple
criteria such as percentage of burns, age, lower limb involvement, the degree of burns
and associated co-morbidities for starting the LMWH.
KEY WORDS
Burns - deep vein thrombosis - deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in burns - low molecular
weight heparins - National academy of burns India conference - survey