Defining giant mandibular ameloblastomas – Is a separate clinical sub-entity warranted?

ABSTRACT

Context: The term giant mandibular ameloblastoma (GMAs) while being in popular usage in the medical literature remains largely equivocal. Although a few authors have in the past attempted to ascribe definite criteria to this entity, these are by and large arbitrary and without any benefit in decision-making or contributing to its management. Aims: The aim of this study is to propose a set of objective criteria for GMAs that can be clinically correlated and thereby aid in the management of this entity. Patients and Methods: Of a total of 16 patients with ameloblastoma of the mandible presenting at our institute from August 2012 to September 2016, 11 patients were identified as having GMAs as per the criteria proposed. Results: The defects in the mandible following segmental resection ranged from 7 to 11.5 cm in length (mean: 9.3 cm). No clinical or radiological evidence of tumour recurrence was found during a mean follow-up period of 10.7 months (range: 2–28 months). Conclusions: Defining GMA based on objective inclusion and exclusion criteria allows segregation of these lesions, thereby helping to remove ambiguity, simplify decision-making and facilitate communication among treating reconstructive surgeons. Inclusion criteria include: (i) The segmental bone defect following resection with a minimum 1 cm margin of healthy bone should exceed 6 cm (ii) The segmental bone defect should involve the central mandibular segment.

KEY WORDS

Ameloblastoma - fibula free flap - jaw neoplasms - mandibular reconstruction - non-vascularised bone graft - segmental mandibulectomy

• REFERENCES

• 1 Crawley WA, Levin LS. Treatment of the ameloblastoma: A controversy. Cancer 1978; 42: 357-63
• 2 Hughes CA, Wilson WR, Olding M. Giant ameloblastoma: Report of an extreme case and a description of its treatment. Ear Nose Throat J 1999; 78: 568 570-2, 574
• 3 Dunn JL, Olan WJ, Bank WO, Narang AK, Schwartz AM. Giant ameloblastoma: Radiologic diagnosis and treatment. Radiographics 1997; 17: 531-6
• 4 Kalavrezos N, Baldwin DJ, Walker DM. Giant neglected ameloblastoma: Single stage treatment and clinicopathological review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 46: 591-3
• 5 van Gemert J, Holtslag I, van der Bilt A, Merkx M, Koole R, Van Cann E. et al. Health-related quality of life after segmental resection of the lateral mandible: Free fibula flap versus plate reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43: 658-62
• 6 Foster RD, Anthony JP, Sharma A, Pogrel MA. Vascularized bone flaps versus nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction: An outcome analysis of primary bony union and endosseous implant success. Head Neck 1999; 21: 66-71
• 7 Pogrel MA, Podlesh S, Anthony JP, Alexander J. A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55: 1200-6
• 8 Shnayder Y, Lin D, Desai SC, Nussenbaum B, Sand JP, Wax MK. et al. Reconstruction of the lateral mandibular defect: A review and treatment algorithm. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17: 367-73
• 9 Boyd JB, Mulholland RS, Davidson J, Gullane PJ, Rotstein LE, Brown DH. et al. The free flap and plate in oromandibular reconstruction: Long-term review and indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95: 1018-28
• 10 Head C, Alam D, Sercarz JA, Lee JT, Rawnsley JD, Berke GS. et al. Microvascular flap reconstruction of the mandible: A comparison of bone grafts and bridging plates for restoration of mandibular continuity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129: 48-54
• 11 Boyd JB, Gullane PJ, Rotstein LE, Brown DH, Irish JC. Classification of mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92: 1266-75
• 12 Chaine A, Pitak-Arnnop P, Dhanuthai K, Ruhin-Poncet B, Bertrand JC, Bertolus C. et al. A treatment algorithm for managing giant mandibular ameloblastoma: 5-year experiences in a Paris university hospital. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35: 999-1005
• 13 Ghandhi D, Ayoub AF, Pogrel MA, MacDonald G, Brocklebank LM, Moos KF. et al. Ameloblastoma: A surgeon's dilemma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 1010-4
• 14 Pogrel MA, Montes DM. Is there a role for enucleation in the management of ameloblastoma?. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38: 807-12
• 15 Feinberg SE, Steinberg B. Surgical management of ameloblastoma. Current status of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 81: 383-8
• 16 MacIntosh RB. Aggressive surgical management of ameloblastoma. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1991; 3: 73-97
• 17 Yim KK, Wei FC. Fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap for mandible reconstruction. Microsurgery 1994; 15: 245-9
• 18 Müller H, Slootweg PJ. The growth characteristics of multilocular ameloblastomas. A histological investigation with some inferences with regard to operative procedures. J Maxillofac Surg 1985; 13: 224-30
• 19 Bähr W, Stoll P, Wächter R. Use of the “double barrel” free vascularized fibula in mandibular reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56: 38-44
• 20 Iizuka T, Häfliger J, Seto I, Rahal A, Mericske-Stern R, Smolka K. et al. Oral rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction using an osteocutaneous fibula free flap with endosseous implants. Factors affecting the functional outcome in patients with oral cancer. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 69-79
• 21 Carr AB, Bram DT. Partially edentulous epidemiology, physiology and terminology. In: McCracken DJ. editor. Removable Partial Prosthodontics. 12th ed.. Missouri: Elsevier Publications; 2011: p. 2-7
• 22 al Qattan MM, Boyd JB. Complications in head and neck microsurgery. Microsurgery 1993; 14: 187-95
• 23 Hidalgo DA. Fibula free flap: A new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 84: 71-9
• 24 Yadav PS, Ahmad QG, Shankhdhar VK, Nambi GI. There is no donor side specificity of fibula free flap for complex oromandibular reconstruction. Indian J Plast Surg 2010; 43: 177-80
• 25 Albert S, Cristofari JP, Cox A, Bensimon JL, Guedon C, Barry B. et al. Mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap. Experience of virtual reconstruction using osirix®, a free and open source software for medical imagery. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2011; 56: 494-503