Three component cartilage framework reconstruction for correction of post-traumatic nasal septal collapse

ABSTRACT

Background: Post-traumatic nasal septal collapse results in flat, broad, non-projecting nose due to mid-vault collapse. These patients may have airway obstruction due to poorly supported internal valve. Traditional techniques like ‘cantilever graft technique’ or conventional ‘L-graft technique’ produce a rigid lobule as the single unit framework extends to the tip. These grafts also lack in internal valve support. Materials and Methods: Twelve patients with post-traumatic nasal septal collapse were treated with three component cartilage framework technique in the past 3 years. The framework was reconstructed in three components-septal, columellar and dorsal onlay; using costal cartilage. If needed, upper lateral cartilage support grafts were also provided. Results: At 6 months’ follow-up, all 12 patients were satisfied with the outcome. The nasal projection and dorsal definition were aesthetically pleasing, and there was free natural movement of the lobular part of the nose. One graft was revised for further improvement in outcome. Airway obstruction, when present was also relieved. Conclusion: This technique has distinct advantages over the conventional techniques as the framework of separate components maintains pliability of the lobule, supports the internal valve and offers good control of aesthetic needs.

KEY WORDS

Cartilage reconstruction - collapse - nasal deformity - rhinoplasty - septal - trauma

• REFERENCES

• 1 Mull CC, Ginsburg MA. Drainage and packing of a nasal septal hematoma. Textbook of Pediatric Emergency Procedures. 2nd ed.. Ch. 51. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008: p. 615
• 2 Chait LA, Becker H, Cort A. The versatile costal osteochondral graft in nasal reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1980; 33: 179
• 3 Brown JB, McDowell F. Plastic Surgery of Nose. St. Lois, MO: C.V. Mosby Company; 1951
• 4 Thaller SR, Bradley JP, Garri JI. Craniofacial Surgery. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2008: p. 59-81
• 5 Patrick KS, Verma M, Arlene AR. Craniomaxillofacial Reconstructive and Corrective Bone Surgery. Ch. 44. New York: Springer; 2013: p. 483
• 6 Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: Septal saddle nose deformity and composite reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 1029-43
• 7 Constantian MB. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Part 1. 2nd ed.. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Saunders (W.B.) Co. Ltd.; 2005: p. 557
• 8 Bhat U, Garg S, D'Souza EJ, Agarkhedkar N, Singh IA, Baliarsing AS. et al. Precision carving of costal cartilage graft for contour fill in aesthetic and reconstructive rhinoplasty. Indian J Plast Surg 2014; 47: 25-35
• 9 Guyuron B. Precision rhinoplasty. Part I: The role of life-size photographs and soft-tissue cephalometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81: 489-99
• 10 Parrilla C, Artuso A, Gallus R, Galli J, Paludetti G. The role of septal surgery in cosmetic rhinoplasty. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2013; 33: 146-53
• 11 André RF, Vuyk HD. Reconstruction of dorsal and/or caudal nasal septum deformities with septal battens or by septal replacement: An overview and comparison of techniques. Laryngoscope 2006; 116: 1668-73
• 12 Cakmak O, Emre IE, Ozkurt FE. Identifying septal support reconstructions for saddle nose deformity: The Cakmak algorithm. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17: 433-9
• 13 Constantian MB, Clardy RB. The relative importance of septal and nasal valvular surgery in correcting airway obstruction in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98: 38-54
• 14 Daniel RK. Mastering Rhinoplasty: A Comprehensive Technique Atlas of Surgical Techniques with Integrated Video Clips. 2nd ed.. Ch. 6. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2010: p. 204
• 15 Bhat U, Patel B. Primary rhinoplasty: An Indian perspective. Indian J Plast Surg 2008; 41: S9-19