CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2018; 28(03): 315-319
DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_75_18
Gastrointestinal Radiology and Hepatology

Triple-phase MDCT of liver: Scan protocol modification to obtain optimal vascular and lesional contrast

Sheoran Sween
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Base Hospital Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India
,
Chatterjee Samar
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Command Hospital, Calcutta, West Bengal, India
,
Sekhar Binu
Aerospace Medicine, Military Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Abstract

Context: With advances in 16-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), the entire liver can be scanned in 4–6 s and a single breath-hold dual-phase scan can be performed in 12–16 s. Consequently, optimizing the scan window has become critical. Aim: The purpose of our study was to optimize scan delays using bolus-tracking techniques for triple-phase CT of the liver. Settings and Design: Fifty patients with liver lesions were randomly divided into two groups with 25 patients each. The patients were subjected to triple-phase MDCT of liver with two different scan protocols. Materials and Methods: They were administered 1.5 mL/kg of 300 mg/mL of iohexol at a rate of 3.0 mL/s with a pressure injector. Using bolus-tracking program, scans were commenced at 4, 19, and 44 s and 8, 23, and 48 s for the first, second, and third phases, respectively. The mean CT values [Hounsfield unit (HU)] were measured in the aorta, hepatic artery, portal vein, hepatic vein, liver parenchyma, and lesion using circular region of interest cursor ranging in size from 5 to 20 mm in diameter on all phases. Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analysis was carried out using paired Student's t-test. Results: In hepatic arterial phase, hepatic artery has shown better enhancement in Group B (8 s) (P = 0.0498) compared with Group A (4 s). In portal venous phase, there were no significant differences in contrast enhancement index (CEI) values at any of the six measured regions between the groups. In the hepatic venous phase, liver parenchyma has shown nearly significant (P = 0.0664) higher CEI values in Group B (48 s) when compared with Group A (44 s). Conclusion: A scan delay of 8 s, after trigger threshold (100 HU) is reached in the lower thoracic aorta, is optimal for the early arterial phase imaging, this phase being most helpful for assessment of hepatic arterial tree (CT angiography). The liver parenchyma showed maximum enhancement at 48 s scan delay.



Publication History

Article published online:
26 July 2021

© 2018. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Foley WD, Mallisee TA, Hohenwalter MD, Wilson CR, Quiroz FA, Taylor AJ. Multiphase hepatic CT with a multirow detector CT scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 679-85
  • 2 Bae KT. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: When does it occurs and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology 2003; 227: 809-16
  • 3 Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Radiology 1998; 207: 657-62
  • 4 Kim T, Murakami T, Hori M, Takamura M, Takahashi S, Okada A. et al. Small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas revealed by double arterial phase CT performed with single breath-hold scanning and automatic bolus tracking. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 899-904
  • 5 Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, Sagel SS, Crowe TM, Gaines MV. Dynamic incremental CT: Effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology 1995; 195: 353-7
  • 6 Awai K, Hiraishi K, Hori S. Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight. Radiology 2004; 230: 142-50
  • 7 Megibow AJ, Jacob G, Heiken JP, Paulson EK, Hopper KD, Sica G. et al. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of volume of low osmolality contrast medium needed for routine helical abdominal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 583-9
  • 8 Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Bankier AA, Hittmair K. Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. Radiology 2000; 214: 363-71
  • 9 Guerrisi A, Marin D, Nelson RC, De Filippis G, Di Martino M, Barnhart H. et al. Effect of varying contrast material iodine concentration and injection technique on the conspicuity of hepatocellular carcinoma during 64-section MDCT of patients with cirrhosis. BJR 2011; 84: 698-708
  • 10 Schima W, Hammerstingl R, Cartalano C, Marti-Bonmati L, Rummeny EJ, Montero FT. et al. Quadruple-phase MDCT of liver in patients with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma: Effect of contrast material flow rate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 1575-9
  • 11 Malnar D, Klasan GS, Miletić D, Bajek S, Vranić TS, Arbanas J. Properties of the celiac trunk – Anatomical study. Coll Antropol 2010; 34: 917-21
  • 12 Ohashi I, Hanafusa K, Yoshida T. Small hepatocellular carcinomas: Two-phase dynamic incremental CT in detection and evaluation. Radiology 1993; 189: 851-5
  • 13 Forner A, Vilana R, Ayuso C, Bianchi L, Solé M, Ayuso JR. et al. Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: Prospective validation of the non-invasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2008; 47: 97-104
  • 14 Kim MJ, Choi JY, Lim JS, Kim JY, Kim JH, Oh YT. et al. Optimal scan window for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas during MDCT examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 198
  • 15 Sun X, Liu C, Liang C, Sun C, Liu S, Deng K. Hepatocellular carcinomas: Correlation between time to peak hepatocellular carcinomas enhancement and time to peak aortic enhancement. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2009; 33: 312-6
  • 16 Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Yokoyama R, Miyoshi T, Nishibori H. et al. MDCT of the liver and hypervascular carcinomas: Optimizing scan delays for bolus-tracking techniques of hepatic arterial and portal venous phases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: W25-32
  • 17 Chan RS, Kumar G, Abdullah BJJ, Ng Kh, Vijayananthan A, Mohd NorH. et al Optimising the scan delay for arterial phase imaging of the liver using the bolus tracking technique. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2011; 7: e12
  • 18 Kamel IR, Kruskal JB, Keogan MT, Goldberg SN, Warmbrand G, Raptopoulos V. Multidetector CT of potential right – Lobe liver donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 645-51
  • 19 Denecke T, Grieser C, Fröling V, Steffen IG, Rudolph B, Stelter L. et al. Multislice computed tomography using a triple-phase contrast protocol for preoperative assessment of hepatic tumor load in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation. Transpl Int 2009; 22: 395-402
  • 20 Oliver JH, Baecon RL. Helical biphasic contrast enhanced CT of liver: Technique, Indications, Interpretations and Pitfalls. Radiology 1996; 201: 1-14