CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2017; 08(02): 068-071
DOI: 10.4103/jde.JDE_85_16
Original Article
Journal of Digestive Endoscopy

Spectrum of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients with Motor Dysphagia and Noncardiac Chest Pain ‑ A Single Center Experience

Rinkesh Kumar Bansal
Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta ‑ The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Mukesh Nasa
Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta ‑ The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Gaurav Kumar Patil
Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta ‑ The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Vinit Shah
Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta ‑ The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Narendra S. Choudhary
Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta ‑ The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Rajesh Puri
Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta ‑ The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
,
Randhir Sud
Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta ‑ The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Aims and Objective: High‑resolution esophageal manometry is the most important investigation for the evaluation of patients with dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). Chicago Classification (CC) utilizing an algorithmic approach in analyzing high‑resolution manometry has been accepted worldwide, and an updated version, CC v3.0, of this classification has been developed by the International high‑resolution manometry working Group in 2014. Data on the spectrum of esophageal motility disorders in Indian population are scarce as well as a newer version of CC has not been used to classify. The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical presentation and manometric profile of patients with suspected esophageal motility disorders using CC v3.0. Methodology: In this retrospective study, consecutive patients referred for esophageal manometry at our center from 2010 to 2015 were included in the study. High‑resolution esophageal manometry was performed with 22‑channel water‑perfusion system (MMS, The Netherlands). Newer version of CC (CC v3.0) was used to classify motility disorders. Results: A total of 400 patients were included, with a mean age of 44 years and 67.5% were males. Out of these, 60% (n = 240) patients presented with motor dysphagia while 40% (n = 160) had NCCP. Motility disorder was present in 50.5% (n = 202) of the patients while 49.5% (n = 198) patients had normal manometry. Disorders of esophagogastric junction outflow were the predominant type of disorder, found in 33.75% (n = 135). About 14.25% (n = 57) of the patients had minor disorders of peristalsis while 5% (n = 20) of the patients had other major disorders of peristalsis. Achalasia was the most common motility disorder present in 30% (n = 120) patients. Conclusion: Dysphagia was the most common esophageal symptom followed by NCCP in our series. Achalasia was the most common esophageal motility disorder followed by fragmented peristalsis.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Clouse RE, Prakash C. Topographic esophageal manometry: An emerging clinical and investigative approach. Dig Dis 2000; 18: 64-74
  • 2 Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ. et al The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27: 160-74
  • 3 Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. American Gastroenterological Association. AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 209-24
  • 4 Bhatia SJ, Malkan GH, Ravi P, Abraham P. Correlation of manometric and radiographic diagnosis in esophageal motility disorders. Indian J Gastroenterol 1995; 14: 124-7
  • 5 Misra A, Chourasia D, Ghoshal UC. Manometric and symptomatic spectrum of motor dysphagia in a tertiary referral center in Northern India. Indian J Gastroenterol 2010; 29: 12-6
  • 6 Jerlock M, Welin C, Rosengren A, Gaston-Johansson F. Pain characteristics in patients with unexplained chest pain and patients with ischemic heart disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2007; 6: 130-6
  • 7 Fass R, Navarro-Rodriguez T. Noncardiac chest pain. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 636-46
  • 8 Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Kaufman E, Obrecht S, Fox M. Normative values and inter-observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: 509
  • 9 Dekel R, Pearson T, Wendel C, De Garmo P, Fennerty MB, Fass R. Assessment of oesophageal motor function in patients with dysphagia or chest pain – The Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18: 1083-9
  • 10 Locke 3rd GR, Talley NJ, Fett SL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton 3rd LJ. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: A population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1448-56
  • 11 Eslick GD, Jones MP, Talley NJ. Non-cardiac chest pain: Prevalence, risk factors, impact and consulting – A population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17: 1115-24
  • 12 Howard PJ, Maher L, Pryde A, Cameron EW, Heading RC. Five year prospective study of the incidence, clinical features, and diagnosis of achalasia in Edinburgh. Gut 1992; 33: 1011-5