RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.550
Our Experiences in Nipple Reconstruction Using the Hammond flap
Background Nipple reconstruction following breast mound reconstruction is the final step in breast reconstruction. Although nipple reconstruction is a simple surgery, the psychological aspects of nipple reconstruction are thought to be important. Nipple projection is a key factor in determining patient satisfaction with the surgery. In the present study, the Hammond flap technique was introduced for nipple reconstruction.
Methods Twenty-six patients who had undergone breast reconstruction from February 2008 to March 2012 were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients were evaluated based on preoperative photos, and their nipple diameters and heights were measured. Postoperative evaluation was conducted 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following nipple reconstruction. A questionnaire on patient satisfaction with the nipple reconstruction was administered 12 months after nipple reconstruction. Moreover, the same plastic surgeon scored nipple projection and overall cosmetic result of the new nipple.
Results The mean projection was 4.4 mm (range, 3-6 mm), and it well matched the contralateral nipple. Twelve months following nipple reconstruction, the mean reduction rate in the nipple projection was 43.6%. Patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the nipple projection and the overall cosmetic result in 80.7% cases.
Conclusions In the present study, compared with other techniques, the use of the Hammond flap technique in nipple reconstruction showed competitive results with regard to nipple projection and patient satisfaction.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 16. Mai 2014
Angenommen: 16. Juni 2014
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. Mai 2022
© 2014. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC. et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 1014-1025
- 2 Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB. et al. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80: 699-704
- 3 Little JW. Nipple-areolar reconstruction. In: Cohen M. Mastery of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Boston: Little, Brown; 1994: 1342-1348
- 4 Adams WM. Free transplantation of the nipples and areola. Surgery 1944; 15: 186-189
- 5 Ketan MP, Maurice YN. Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex. In: Neligan P. Plastic surgery. 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier Saunders; 2013: 488-520
- 6 Shestak KC, Nguyen TD. The double opposing periareola flap: a novel concept for nipple-areola reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 473-480
- 7 Hammond DC, Khuthaila D, Kim J. The skate flap purse-string technique for nipple-areola complex reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120: 399-406
- 8 Dolmans GH, van de Kar AL, van Rappard JH. et al. Nipple reconstruction: the "Hammond" flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 353-354
- 9 Katsuragi Y, Kayano S, Koizumi T. et al. How long does the nipple projection last after reconstruction using the skate flap purse-string technique?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 149e-151e
- 10 Mathes SJ, Hentz VR. Plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006
- 11 Kim DY, Dhong ES, Yoon ES. et al. Long-term result of nipple reconstruction using skate flap after breast reconstruction. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 38: 401-407
- 12 Sircar T, Chouhan A, Johri A. Cartella eye-shield as a dressing after nipple reconstruction - a technical innovation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92: 439-440
- 13 Rubino C, Dessy LA, Posadinu A. A modified technique for nipple reconstruction: the 'arrow flap'. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56: 247-251
- 14 Few JW, Marcus JR, Casas LA. et al. Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 1321-1324
- 15 Valdatta L, Montemurro P, Tamborini F. et al. Our experience of nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: 1 year evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 1293-1298
- 16 Losken A, Mackay GJ, Bostwick 3rd J. Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: a long-term evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 361-369
- 17 Jones AP, Erdmann M. Projection and patient satisfaction using the "Hamburger" nipple reconstruction technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65: 207-212
- 18 Lipa JE, Addison PD, Neligan PC. Patient satisfaction following nipple reconstruction incorporating autologous costal cartilage. Can J Plast Surg 2008; 16: 85-88