Closure of Myelomeningocele Defects Using a Limberg Flap or Direct Repair

Background The global prevalence of myelomeningocele has been reported to be 0.8–1 per 1,000 live births. Early closure of the defect is considered to be the standard of care. Various surgical methods have been reported, such as primary skin closure, local skin flaps, musculocutaneous flaps, and skin grafts. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of myelomeningocele defects and present the surgical outcomes of recent cases of myelomeningocele at our institution.

Methods Patients who underwent surgical closure of myelomeningocele at our institution from January 2004 to December 2013 were included in this study. A retrospective chart review of their medical records was performed, and comorbidities, defect size, location, surgical procedures, complications, and the final results were analyzed.

Results A total of 14 patients underwent surgical closure for myelomeningocele defects. Twelve cases were closed with direct skin repair, while two cases required local skin flaps to cover the skin defects. Three cases of infection occurred, requiring incision and either drainage or removal of allogenic materials. One case of partial flap necrosis occurred, requiring secondary revision using a rotational flap and a full-thickness skin graft. Despite these complications, all wounds eventually healed completely.

Conclusions Most myelomeningocele defects can be managed by direct skin repair alone. In cases of large defects, in which direct repair is not possible, local flaps may be used to cover the defect. Complications such as wound dehiscence and partial flap necrosis occurred in this study; however, all such complications were successfully managed with simple ancillary procedures.

Keywords

Myelomeningocele - Surgical flap - Wound closure techniques

This article was presented at the Fourth Research and Reconstructive Forum on April 3–4, 2014 in Busan, Korea.

Publication History

Received: 16 March 2015

Accepted: 06 July 2015

Article published online:
20 April 2022

• References

• 1 Wallingford JB. Neural tube closure and neural tube defects: studies in animal models reveal known knowns and known unknowns. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2005; 135C: 59-68
• 2 Scheflan M, Mehrhof Jr AI, Ward JD. Meningomyelocele closure with distally based latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 956-959
• 3 Botto LD, Moore CA, Khoury MJ. et al. Neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1509-1519
• 4 Greenberg F, James LM, Oakley Jr GP. Estimates of birth prevalence rates of spina bifida in the United States from computer-generated maps. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 570-573
• 5 Lapid O, Rosenberg L, Cohen A. Meningomyelocele reconstruction with bilobed flaps. Br J Plast Surg 2001; 54: 570-572
• 6 El-khatib HA. Large thoracolumbar meningomyelocele defects: incidence and clinical experiences with different modalities of latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57: 411-417
• 7 Campobasso P, Pesce C, Costa L. et al. The use of the Limberg skin flap for closure of large lumbosacral myelomeningoceles. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20: 144-147
• 8 Patterson TJ. The use of rotation flaps following excision of lumbar myelo-meningoceles: an aid to the closure of large defects. Br J Surg 1959; 46: 606-608
• 9 Zide BM. Spina bifida. In: McCarthy JG. Plastic surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990: 3780-3790
• 10 Adzick NS. Fetal surgery for spina bifida: past, present, future. Semin Pediatr Surg 2013; 22: 10-17
• 11 Muskett A, Barber WH, Parent AD. et al. Contemporary postnatal plastic surgical management of meningomyelocele. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65: 572-577
• 12 Mustarde JC. Reconstruction of the spinal canal in severe spina bifida. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 42: 109-114
• 13 McCraw JB, Penix JO, Baker JW. Repair of major defects of the chest wall and spine with the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 62: 197-206
• 14 McDevitt NB, Gillespie RP, Woosley RE. et al. Closure of thoracic and lumbar dysgraphic defects using bilateral latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap transfer with extended gluteal fasciocutaneous flaps. Childs Brain 1982; 9: 394-399
• 15 Munro IR, Neu BR, Humphreys RP. et al. Limberg-latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for closure of myelomeningocele. Childs Brain 1983; 10: 381-386
• 16 VanderKolk CA, Adson MH, Stevenson TR. The reverse latissimus dorsi muscle flap for closure of meningomyelocele. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81: 454-456
• 17 Ramirez OM, Ramasastry SS, Granick MS. et al. A new surgical approach to closure of large lumbosacral meningomyelocele defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80: 799-809
• 18 Patel KB, Taghinia AH, Proctor MR. et al. Extradural myelomeningocele reconstruction using local turnover fascial flaps and midline linear skin closure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65: 1569-1572
• 19 El-Sabbagh AH, Zidan AS. Closure of large myelomeningocele by lumbar artery perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27: 287-294
• 20 Duffy Jr FJ, Weprin BE, Swift DM. A new approach to closure of large lumbosacral myelomeningoceles: the superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 1864-1868
• 21 Cruz NI, Ariyan S, Duncan CC. et al. Repair of lumbosacral myelomeningoceles with double Z-rhomboid flaps. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1983; 59: 714-717
• 22 Habal MB, Vries JK. Tension free closure of large meningomyelocele defects. Surg Neurol 1977; 8: 177-180
• 23 Ohtsuka H, Shioya N, Yada K. Modified Limberg flap for lumbosacral meningomyelocele defects. Ann Plast Surg 1979; 3: 114-117