CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2018; 45(03): 289-290
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.00794
Image

Utility of topical epinephrine for determining the resection range of eyelid sebaceous carcinoma with dermatitis

Tomoki Kiuchi
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yusuke Shimizu
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, Okinawa, Japan
,
Shun Yamazaki
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, Okinawa, Japan
,
Tsuyoshi Awazawa
Department of Dermatology, University of the Ryukyus Hospital, Okinawa, Japan
,
Kazuo Kishi
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations

Although sebaceous carcinoma is a relatively rare malignant tumor of the skin, death from metastasis can occur in up to 6% of all cases [1]. The first-line treatment is extended surgical resection with appropriate margins. However, if the tumor is associated with dermatitis, its border may be unclear, which can make determination of the resection range difficult. The authors encountered an 86-year-old woman with a right upper eyelid sebaceous carcinoma misdiagnosed as blepharitis, which was treated with a topical steroid ointment for more than 1 year. When the authors operated, rebound inflammation due to the sudden discontinuation of long-term steroid treatment appeared around the tumor, obscuring its border ([Fig. 1]). However, topical epinephrine (1:100,000 dilution) applied to stop bleeding from the biopsy site incidentally clarified its border, facilitating determination of the appropriate resection range ([Fig. 2]). Pathological diagnoses of the skin margin using paraffin sections were negative.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1. Immediately after lower right eyelid punch biopsy. The border of the tumor was unclear because of the surrounding dermatitis.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2. Right eyelid after topical epinephrine (1:100,000 dilution). The border of the tumor was clarified after removal of the epinephrine-soaked gauze. The extent of skin resection was determined (10 mm margin).

Inflammation has five signs: redness, heat sensation, swelling, pain, and dysfunction. Redness and heat sensation due to inflammation arise as a result of capillary dilation and increases in local blood flow. Because epinephrine acts on the α1 receptor and constricts peripheral vessels in the skin, it reduces bleeding from surgical wounds and is therefore useful in surgery [2] [3]. It is believed that epinephrine treatment temporarily improved the redness and clarified the tumor border.

In future studies, we would aim to increase the number of cases, including not only eyelid and sebaceous adenocarcinoma, but also other anatomical locations and tumors. The patient consented to publish her clinical course and photographs.

NOTES

Patient consent

The patient provided written informed consent for the publication and the use of her images.


#
#

Publication History

Received: 22 April 2017

Accepted: 22 June 2017

Article published online:
03 April 2022

© 2018. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Vianna LM, Cariello AJ, Lowen MS. et al. Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid - different diagnostic times, different outcomes: case reports. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2011; 74: 444-6
  • 2 Groenewold MD, Gribnau AJ, Ubbink DT. Topical haemostatic agents for skin wounds: a systematic review. BMC Surg 2011; 11: 15
  • 3 McKee DE, Lalonde DH, Thoma A. et al. Optimal time delay between epinephrine injection and incision to minimize bleeding. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131: 811-4