Selection of oncoplastic surgical technique in Asian breast cancer patients

Background Oncoplastic surgery is being increasingly performed in Korean women; however, unlike Westerners, Korean women usually have small to moderate-sized breasts. To achieve better outcomes in reconstructed breasts, several factors should be considered to determine the optimal surgical method.

Methods A total of 108 patients who underwent oncoplastic surgery from January 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively investigated. We used various methods, including glandular tissue reshaping, latissimus dorsi (LD) flap transposition, and reduction oncoplasty, to restore the breast volume and symmetry.

Results The mean weight of the tumor specimens was 40.46 g, and the ratio of the tumor specimen weight to breast volume was 0.12 g/mL in the patients who underwent glandular tissue reshaping (n=59). The corresponding values were 101.47 g and 0.14 g/mL, respectively, in the patients who underwent reduction oncoplasty (n=17), and 82.54 g and 0.20 g/mL, respectively, in those treated with an LD flap (n=32). Glandular tissue reshaping was mostly performed in the upper outer quadrant, and LD flap transposition was mostly performed in the lower inner quadrant. No major complications were noted. Most patients were satisfied with the aesthetic results.

Conclusions We report satisfactory outcomes of oncoplastic surgical procedures in Korean patients. The results regarding specimen weight and the tumor-to-breast ratio of Asian patients will be a helpful reference point for determining the most appropriate oncoplastic surgical technique.

Keywords

Mammaplasty - Surgical flaps - Breast neoplasms

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 16. April 2017

Angenommen: 18. Oktober 2017

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. April 2022

• REFERENCES

• 1 NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 1991; 265: 391-5
• 2 Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW. Cosmetic assessment of breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer. Breast 1999; 8: 162-8
• 3 Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A. et al. Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 41: 471-81
• 4 Serra-Renom JM, Serra-Mestre JM, Martinez L. et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of partial mastectomy defects using latissimus dorsi muscle flap without causing scars on the back. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37: 941-9
• 5 Anderson BO, Masetti R, Silverstein MJ. Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniques. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 145-57
• 6 Losken A, Styblo TM, Carlson GW. et al. Management algorithm and outcome evaluation of partial mastectomy defects treated using reduction or mastopexy techniques. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59: 235-42
• 7 Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B. et al. Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 26-34
• 8 Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J. et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1233-41
• 9 Arriagada R, Le MG, Rochard F. et al. Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 1558-64
• 10 Lichter AS, Lippman ME, Danforth Jr DN. et al. Mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: a randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 976-83
• 11 Urban C, Lima R, Schunemann E. et al. Oncoplastic principles in breast conserving surgery. Breast 2011; 20 Suppl 3: S92-5
• 12 Yang JD, Kim MC, Lee JW. et al. Usefulness of oncoplastic volume replacement techniques after breast conserving surgery in small to moderate-sized breasts. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39: 489-96
• 13 Clough KB, Kroll SS, Audretsch W. An approach to the repair of partial mastectomy defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 409-20
• 14 Losken A, Schaefer TG, Carlson GW. et al. Immediate endoscopic latissimus dorsi flap: risk or benefit in reconstructing partial mastectomy defects. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53: 1-5
• 15 Losken A, Hamdi M. Partial breast reconstruction: current perspectives. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 722-36
• 16 Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson AR. et al. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 1505-9
• 17 Missana MC, Pomel C. Endoscopic latissimus dorsi flap harvesting. Am J Surg 2007; 194: 164-9
• 18 Yang CE, Roh TS, Yun IS. et al. Immediate partial breast reconstruction with endoscopic latissimus dorsi muscle flap harvest. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41: 513-9
• 19 Daltrey I, Thomson H, Hussien M. et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of quilting latissimus dorsi flap donor site on seroma formation. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 825-30
• 20 Shin IS, Lee DW, Lew DH. Efficacy of quilting sutures and fibrin sealant together for prevention of seroma in extended latissimus dorsi flap donor sites. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39: 509-13
• 21 Pogson CJ, Adwani A, Ebbs SR. Seroma following breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003; 29: 711-7
• 22 Mills JM, Schultz DJ, Solin LJ. Preservation of cosmesis with low complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39: 637-41
• 23 Taylor ME, Perez CA, Halverson KJ. et al. Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31: 753-64
• 24 Lee JW, Kim MC, Park HY. et al. Oncoplastic volume replacement techniques according to the excised volume and tumor location in small- to moderate-sized breasts. Gland Surg 2014; 3: 14-21