Download PDF
CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2018; 45(03): 214-221
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.01193
Review Article

Definitions of groove and hollowness of the infraorbital region and clinical treatment using soft-tissue filler

Ji-Hyun Lee
Department of Anatomy, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
,
Giwoong Hong
Samskin Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul, Korea
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Clarification is needed regarding the definitions and classification of groove and hollowness of the infraorbital region depending on the cause, anatomical characteristics, and appearance. Grooves in the infraorbital region can be classified as nasojugal grooves (or folds), tear trough deformities, and palpebromalar grooves; these can be differentiated based on anatomical characteristics. They are caused by the herniation of intraorbital fat, atrophy of the skin and subcutaneous fat, contraction of the orbital part of the orbicularis oculi muscle or squinting, and malar bone resorption. Safe and successful treatment requires an optimal choice of filler and treatment method. The choice between a cannula and needle depends on various factors; a needle is better for injections into a subdermal area in a relatively safe plane, while a cannula is recommended for avoiding vascular compromise when injecting filler into a deep fat layer and releasing fibrotic ligamentous structures. The injection of a soft-tissue filler into the subcutaneous fat tissue is recommended for treating mild indentations around the orbital rim and nasojugal region. Reducing the tethering effect of ligamentous structures by undermining using a cannula prior to the filler injection is recommended for treating relatively deep and fine indentations. The treatment of mild prolapse of the intraorbital septal fat or broad flattening of the infraorbital region can be improved by restoring the volume deficiency using a relatively firm filler.

Tear trough - Skin aging - Eyelids - Subcutaneous tissue - Dermal fillers


Publication History

Received: 14 July 2017

Accepted: 25 January 2018

Article published online:
03 April 2022

© 2018. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Hirmand H. Anatomy and nonsurgical correction of the tear trough deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 699-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Haddock NT, Saadeh PB, Boutros S. et al. The tear trough and lid/cheek junction: anatomy and implications for surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 1332-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Costa CR, Kordestani R, Small KH. et al. Advances and refinement in hyaluronic acid facial fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138: 233e-236e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Whitnall SE. The anatomy of the human orbit and accessory organs of vision. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press; 1932
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Loeb R. Naso-jugal groove leveling with fat tissue. Clin Plast Surg 1993; 20: 393-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Flowers RS. The tear trough deformity and its correction. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the California Society of Plastic Surgeons. 1970. Monterey; USA:
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Hwang K. Eponym of naso-jugal fold and tear trough. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27: 1350-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Yang C, Zhang P, Xing X. Tear trough and palpebromalar groove in young versus elderly adults: a sectional anatomy study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 796-808
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hwang K, Kim HJ, Kim H. et al. Origin of the lower orbicularis oculi muscle in relation to the nasojugal groove. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26: 1389-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wong CH, Hsieh MK, Mendelson B. The tear trough ligament: anatomical basis for the tear trough deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 1392-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Muzaffar AR, Mendelson BC, Adams Jr WP. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments of the lower lid and lateral canthus. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 873-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Flowers RS. Periorbital aesthetic surgery for men: eyelids and related structures. Clin Plast Surg 1991; 18: 689-729
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mendelson BC, Muzaffar AR, Adams Jr WP. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek and malar mounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 885-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stutman RL, Codner MA. Tear trough deformity: review of anatomy and treatment options. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32: 426-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kim HJ, Seo KK, Lee HK. et al. Botulinum filler clinical anatomy. Seoul: Hanmi Medical Publishing Co; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Yang HM, Lee JG, Hu KS. et al. New anatomical insights on the course and branching patterns of the facial artery: clinical implications of injectable treatments to the nasolabial fold and nasojugal groove. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133: 1077-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Koh KS, Kim HJ, Oh CS. et al. Branching patterns and symmetry of the course of the facial artery in Koreans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 32: 414-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bosniak S, Cantisano-Zilkha M, Purewal BK. et al. Defining the tear trough. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 23: 254-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lambros V. Observations on periorbital and midface aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120: 1367-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mendelson BC, Hartley W, Scott M. et al. Age-related changes of the orbit and midcheek and the implications for facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007; 31: 419-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Scheuer 3rd JF, Sieber DA, Pezeshk RA. et al. Anatomy of the facial danger zones: maximizing safety during soft-tissue filler injections. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139: 50e-58e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pessa JE, Rohrich RJ. Clinical anatomy of the face. Kim IH, Yoon ES, Translators. Seoul: Jeong woo Medical Book; 2012.
  • 23 Carruthers J, Carruthers A, Humphrey S. Introduction to Fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (5 Suppl) 120S-131S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Flynn TC, Thompson DH, Hyun SH. et al. Ultrastructural analysis of 3 hyaluronic acid soft-tissue fillers using scanning electron microscopy. Dermatol Surg 2015; 41 Suppl 1: S143-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cotofana S, Schenck TL, Trevidic P. et al. Midface: clinical anatomy and regional approaches with injectable fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 5 Suppl 219S-234S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Stern CS, Schreiber JE, Surek CC. et al. Three-dimensional topographic surface changes in response to compartmental volumization of the medial cheek: defining a malar augmentation zone. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137: 1401-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar