CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2017; 44(01): 42-47
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.1.42
Original Article

Safe and Simplified Salvage Technique for Exposed Implantable Cardiac Electronic Devices under Local Anesthesia

Chang Young Jung
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
,
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
,
Sung-Eun Kim
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
,
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
,
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
,
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
› Author Affiliations

Background Skin erosion is a dire complication of implantable cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators. Classical treatments involve removal of the entire generator and lead systems, however, these may result in fatal complications. In this study, we present our experience with a simplified salvage technique for exposed implantable cardiac electronic devices (ICEDs) without removing the implanted device, in an attempt to reduce the risks and complication rates associated with this condition.

Methods The records of 10 patients who experienced direct ICED exposure between January 2012 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The following surgical procedure was performed in all patients: removal of skin erosion and capsule, creation of a new pocket at least 1.0–1.5 cm inferior to its original position, migration of the ICED to the new pocket, and insertion of closed-suction drainage. Patients with gross local sepsis or septicemia were excluded from this study.

Results Seven patients had cardiac pacemakers and the other 3 had implantable cardiac defibrillators. The time from primary ICED placement to exposure ranged from 0.3 to 151 months (mean, 29 months. Postoperative follow-up in this series ranged from 8 to 31 months (mean follow-up, 22 months). Among the 10 patients, none presented with any signs of overt infection or cutaneous lesions, except 1 patient with hematoma on postoperative day 5. The hematoma was successfully treated by surgical removal and repositioning of the closed-suction drainage.

Conclusions Based on our experience, salvage of exposed ICEDs is possible without removing the device in selected patients.

This work was supported by the 2013 Yeungnam University Research Grant. This article was presented at the Third Research and Reconstructive Forum on May 9–10, 2013 in Daegu, Korea.




Publication History

Received: 11 July 2016

Accepted: 20 October 2016

Article published online:
20 April 2022

© 2017. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Geha AS, Elefteriades JA, Hsu J. et al. Strategies in the surgical treatment of malignant ventricular arrhythmias: an 8-year experience. Ann Surg 1992; 216: 309-316
  • 2 Kelly PA, Wallace S, Tucker B. et al. Postoperative infection with the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator: clinical presentation and use of the gallium scan in diagnosis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988; 11: 1220-1225
  • 3 Vogt PR, Sagdic K, Lachat M. et al. Surgical management of infected permanent transvenous pacemaker systems: ten year experience. J Card Surg 1996; 11: 180-186
  • 4 Wilhelm MJ, Schmid C, Hammel D. et al. Cardiac pacemaker infection: surgical management with and without extracorporeal circulation. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 1707-1712
  • 5 Kolker AR, Redstone JS, Tutela JP. Salvage of exposed implantable cardiac electrical devices and lead systems with pocket change and local flap coverage. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59: 26-29
  • 6 Hurst LN, Evans HB, Windle B. et al. The salvage of infected cardiac pacemaker pockets using a closed irrigation system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1986; 9: 785-792
  • 7 Furman RW, Hiller AJ, Playforth RH. et al. Infected permanent cardiac pacemaker. Management without removal. Ann Thorac Surg 1972; 14: 54-58
  • 8 Furman S. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator infection. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990; 13: 1351
  • 9 Brodman R, Frame R, Andrews C. et al. Removal of infected transvenous leads requiring cardiopulmonary bypass or inflow occlusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 103: 649-654
  • 10 Byrd CL. Advances in device lead extraction. Curr Cardiol Rep 2001; 3: 324
  • 11 Foster AH. Technique for implantation of cardioverter defibrillators in the subpectoral position. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 764-767
  • 12 Jensen SM. Reposition of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator generator from an abdominal pocket to a subpectoral location using the existing electrode. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 21: 627-628
  • 13 Al-Bataineh M, Sajadi S, Fontaine JM. et al. Axillary subpectoral approach for pacemaker or defibrillator implantation in patients with ipsilateral prepectoral infection and limited venous access. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2010; 27: 137-142
  • 14 Knepp EK, Chopra K, Zahiri HR. et al. An effective technique for salvage of cardiac-related devices. Eplasty 2012; 12: e8
  • 15 Gold MR, Peters RW, Johnson JW. et al. Complications associated with pectoral cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: comparison of subcutaneous and submuscular approaches. Worldwide Jewel Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1278-1282
  • 16 Taylor RL, Cohen DJ, Widman LE. et al. Infection of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: management without removal of the device in selected cases. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990; 13: 1352-1355
  • 17 Lee JH, Geha AS, Rattehalli NM. et al. Salvage of infected ICDs: management without removal. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996; 19: 437-442
  • 18 Yamada M, Takeuchi S, Shiojiri Y. et al. Surgical lead-preserving procedures for pacemaker pocket infection. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 1494-1499
  • 19 Baddour LM, Cha YM, Wilson WR. Clinical practice: infections of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 842-849
  • 20 Griffith MJ, Mounsey JP, Bexton RS. et al. Mechanical, but not infective, pacemaker erosion may be successfully managed by re-implantation of pacemakers. Br Heart J 1994; 71: 202-205
  • 21 Har-Shai Y, Amikam S, Ramon Y. et al. The management of exposed cardiac pacemaker pulse generator and electrode using restricted local surgical interventions; subcapsular relocation and vertical-to-horizontal bow transposition techniques. Br J Plast Surg 1990; 43: 307-311
  • 22 Gerzof SG, Oates ME. Imaging techniques for infections in the surgical patient. Surg Clin North Am 1988; 68: 147-165
  • 23 Almassi GH, Olinger GN, Troup PJ. et al. Delayed infection of the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: current recognition and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 95: 908-911