Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Young Adults Treated for Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip, Alveolus, and Palate by a Treatment Protocol Including Two-Stage Palatoplasty: Speech Outcomes

Background No consensus exists on the optimal treatment protocol for orofacial clefts or the optimal timing of cleft palate closure. This study investigated factors influencing speech outcomes after two-stage palate repair in adults with a non-syndromal complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).

Methods This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with a UCLP who underwent two-stage palate closure and were treated at our tertiary cleft centre. Patients ≥17 years of age were invited for a final speech assessment. Their medical history was obtained from their medical files, and speech outcomes were assessed by a speech pathologist during the follow-up consultation.

Results Forty-eight patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 21 years (standard deviation, 3.4 years). Their mean age at the time of hard and soft palate closure was 3 years and 8.0 months, respectively. In 40% of the patients, a pharyngoplasty was performed. On a 5-point intelligibility scale, 84.4% received a score of 1 or 2; meaning that their speech was intelligible. We observed a significant correlation between intelligibility scores and the incidence of articulation errors (P<0.001). In total, 36% showed mild to moderate hypernasality during the speech assessment, and 11%–17% of the patients exhibited increased nasalance scores, assessed through nasometry.

Conclusions The present study describes long-term speech outcomes after two-stage palatoplasty with hard palate closure at a mean age of 3 years old. We observed moderate long-term intelligibility scores, a relatively high incidence of persistent hypernasality, and a high pharyngoplasty incidence.

Keywords

Cleft lip with or without cleft palate, nonsyndromic - Cleft lip - Cleft palate - Adult - Speech

This study was presented at the 72nd Annual meeting of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, held on April 24, 2015, Palm Springs, USA, and at the 10th European Craniofacial Congress, June 25, 2015, Gothenburg, Sweden.

This article contains [Supplementary Table 1].

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 02. August 2016

Angenommen: 22. März 2017

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. April 2022

• REFERENCES

• 1 Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG. et al. Cleft lip and palate. Lancet 2009; 374: 1773-1785
• 2 Schweckendiek H. The problem of early and late surgery in congenital fissure of the of the lips and palate. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1951; 30: 51-56
• 3 Schweckendiek W, Doz P. Primary veloplasty: long-term results without maxillary deformity. a twenty-five year report. Cleft Palate J 1978; 15: 268-274
• 4 Bardach J, Morris HL, Olin WH. Late results of primary veloplasty: the Marburg Project. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 207-218
• 5 Witzel MA, Salyer KE, Ross RB. Delayed hard palate closure: the philosophy revisited. Cleft Palate J 1984; 21: 263-269
• 6 Perko MA. Two-stage closure of cleft palate (progress report). J Maxillofac Surg 1979; 7: 46-80
• 7 Lohmander A, Friede H, Lilja J. Long-term, longitudinal follow-up of individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate after the Gothenburg primary early veloplasty and delayed hard palate closure protocol: speech outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2012; 49: 657-671
• 8 Von Langenbeck B. Operation der angeborenen totalen spaltung des harten gaumens nach einer neuer methode. Dtsch Arch Klin Med 1861; 8: 231
• 9 Mink van der Molen AB, Janssen K, Specken TF. et al. The modified Honig velopharyngoplasty: a new technique to treat hypernasality by palatal lengthening. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 646-649
• 10 Meijer MF. Testing speech of children born with a cleft: a report from the Speech therapy workgroup from the Dutch Association for Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies. Amsterdam, NL: Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum; 2003
• 11 van de Weijer J, Slis I. Nasaliteitsmeting met de nasometer. Logop Foniatr 1991; 63: 97-101
• 12 Lowry R. Kappa as a measure of concordance in categorical sorting [Internet]. Poughkeepsie, NY: Richard Lowry. c2001-2017 cited 2015 Mar 20 Available from: http://vassarstats.net/
• 13 Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 5: timing of palate repair. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24: 54-63
• 14 Holland S, Gabbay JS, Heller JB. et al. Delayed closure of the hard palate leads to speech problems and deleterious maxillary growth. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 1302-1310
• 15 Sell D. Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: a review. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2005; 40: 103-121
• 16 Enemark H, Bolund S, Jorgensen I. Evaluation of unilateral cleft lip and palate treatment: long term results. Cleft Palate J 1990; 27: 354-361
• 17 Schnitt DE, Agir H, David DJ. From birth to maturity: a group of patients who have completed their protocol management. Part I. Unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 805-817
• 18 Semb G, Brattstrom V, Molsted K. et al. The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 1: introduction and treatment experience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005; 42: 64-68
• 19 Jackson O, Stransky CA, Jawad AF. et al. The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia modification of the Furlow double-opposing Z-palatoplasty: 30-year experience and long-term speech outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 613-622
• 20 Farzaneh F, Becker M, Peterson AM. et al. Speech results in adult Swedish patients born with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2008; 42: 7-13
• 21 Van Lierde KM, Monstrey S, Bonte K. et al. The long-term speech outcome in Flemish young adults after two different types of palatoplasty. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 68: 865-875
• 22 Lilja J, Mars M, Elander A. et al. Analysis of dental arch relationships in Swedish unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects: 20-year longitudinal consecutive series treated with delayed hard palate closure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006; 43: 606-611
• 23 Landheer JA, Breugem CC, van der Molen AB. Fistula incidence and predictors of fistula occurrence after cleft palate repair: two-stage closure versus one-stage closure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2010; 47: 623-630
• 24 Wyatt R, Sell D, Russell J. et al. Cleft palate speech dissected: a review of current knowledge and analysis. Br J Plast Surg 1996; 49: 143-149
• 25 Leclerc JE, Godbout A, Arteau-Gauthier I. et al. We can predict postpalatoplasty velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft palate patients. Laryngoscope 2014; 124: 561-569